Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm

Fix the absence of an answer.

My argument s done.  Waiting on yours. 
 

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm

My argument s done.  Waiting on yours.

No you're not, **** *******.

If I had made no point, about what have you been queefing?

Maybe if you hadn't been so busy arguing with yourself 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm

My argument s done.  Waiting on yours.

No you're not, **** *******.

If I had made no point, about what have you been queefing?

Maybe if you hadn't been so busy arguing with yourself 

 

Nah, my argument was simple.  Suarez is not on the same level as Ronaldo and Messi.  You have been all over the map. 

Case Closed.  

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm

Nah, my argument was simple.  Suarez is not on the same level as Ronaldo and Messi.  You have been all over the map. 

Case Closed.

No....you are reframing.

You took offense at me labeling Suarez "one of the greatest strikers of his generation", for reasons known only to you.

When the utter absurdity of your position became apparent to you, you reframed the debate.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:39 pm

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm

Nah, my argument was simple.  Suarez is not on the same level as Ronaldo and Messi.  You have been all over the map. 

Case Closed

No....you are reframing.

You took offense at me labeling Suarez "one of the greatest strikers of his generation", for reasons known only to you.

When the utter absurdity of your position became apparent to you, you reframed the debate.

 

 

FIFY
That was always my argument.  YOU took offense that I don't place Suarez, as well as any other that knows the game, at the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.  And they are from the same generation as Suarez. I had also stated Suarez could not carry his team, particularly in the World Cup. I never said he wasn't a good striker.  Never argued if he was great or not. That was all part of your reframe when it became painfully obvious you got curbstomped.  You have a habit of trying to control the conversation in the direction you want so you can reframe.  You lost that as well.  

That is what set this whole thing off.  And the numbers support my argument.  

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:48 pm

FIFY
That was always my argument. YOU took offense that I don't place Suarez, as well as any other that knows the game, at the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.  And they are from the same generation as Suarez. I had also stated Suarez could not carry his team, particularly in the World Cup. I never said he wasn't a good striker.  Never argued if he was great or not. That was all part of your reframe when it became painfully obvious you got curbstomped.  You have a habit of trying to control the conversation in the direction you want so you can reframe.  You lost that as well.  

That is what set this whole thing off.  And the numbers support my argument.

No, lying little piece of ****.


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 2:05 pm

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 1:48 pm

FIFY
That was always my argument. YOU took offense that I don't place Suarez, as well as any other that knows the game, at the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.  And they are from the same generation as Suarez. I had also stated Suarez could not carry his team, particularly in the World Cup. I never said he wasn't a good striker.  Never argued if he was great or not. That was all part of your reframe when it became painfully obvious you got curbstomped.  You have a habit of trying to control the conversation in the direction you want so you can reframe.  You lost that as well.  

That is what set this whole thing off.  And the numbers support my argument.

No, lying little piece of ****.


 

 

Yes, PP.  This is how it went down:

That was always my argument. YOU took offense that I don't place Suarez, as well as any other that knows the game, at the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.  And they are from the same generation as Suarez. I had also stated Suarez could not carry his team, particularly in the World Cup. I never said he wasn't a good striker.  Never argued if he was great or not. That was all part of your reframe when it became painfully obvious you got curbstomped.  You have a habit of trying to control the conversation in the direction you want so you can reframe.  You lost that as well.  

That is what set this whole thing off.  And the numbers support my argument.


 

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 2:56 pm

Yes, PP.  This is how it went down:

That was always my argument. YOU took offense that I don't place Suarez, as well as any other that knows the game, at the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.  And they are from the same generation as Suarez. I had also stated Suarez could not carry his team, particularly in the World Cup. I never said he wasn't a good striker.  Never argued if he was great or not. That was all part of your reframe when it became painfully obvious you got curbstomped.  You have a habit of trying to control the conversation in the direction you want so you can reframe.  You lost that as well.  

That is what set this whole thing off.  And the numbers support my argument.

No...it isn't....

You can't remember your own words without links and threads.

You couldn't remember WHEN we had the exchange or where Sweden finished in the WC at issue.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 3:25 pm

No...it isn't....

You can't remember your own words without links and threads.

You couldn't remember WHEN we had the exchange or where Sweden finished in the WC at issue.

Your problem is I do remember.

Huey » 13 Dec 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 3:41 pm

Your problem is I do remember.

Odd....when asked, you couldn't answer.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm

Odd....when asked, you couldn't answer.

What's not odd...you expect others to answer your questions while you evade others. 

You have been doing that since 2017, that's why it isn't odd for you.

Vegas » 13 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm

What's not odd...you expect others to answer your questions while you evade others. 

You have been doing that since 2017, that's why it isn't odd for you.

You're lying.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:23 pm

You're lying.

This again. Accuse me of lying...without evidence that I am lying. 

Want to see how good I am at predicting you? Watch this: 

1. You will post the pic without acknowledging the difference between a mistake and a lie. 

Vegas » 13 Dec 2022, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:32 pm

This again. Accuse me of lying...without evidence that I am lying. 

Want to see how good I am at predicting you? Watch this: 

1. You will post the pic without acknowledging the difference between a mistake and a lie.

Does the rule about providing evidence apply to you?

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:40 pm

Does the rule about providing evidence apply to you?

     
Selective memory. Textbook narcissism.

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



 

Vegas » 13 Dec 2022, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:44 pm

     
Selective memory. Textbook narcissism.

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Does the rule about providing evidence apply to you, coward?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:46 pm

Does the rule about providing evidence apply to you, coward?

Like I would expect you to read the answer. It utterly destroys you. 

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room


Prediction
1. You still will not read the answer, then call it an assertion.     

Vegas » 13 Dec 2022, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:47 pm

Like I would expect you to read the answer. It utterly destroys you. 

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Prediction
1. You still will not read the answer, then call it an assertion.   

Post the answer.

Now
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm

Post the answer.

Now

You got it. Here you go. 

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Vegas » 13 Dec 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2022, 4:53 pm

You got it. Here you go. 

Judge Aileen Is About To Learn That Neatness Is Not Enough.... - Page 2 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Post your rule on clicking links...

Now.


**** idiot.