Liberal Forum

Skans » 06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm

The funny thing is.....YOU TOOK THEIR POISON TOO.  The only difference is that I took the antidote.  And you just got a big batch of Chink-Flu spike-proteins shoved up your rectum.

The spike proteins are from the vax, stupid - not from the virus.

Learn what you took, retard.

Skans » 06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm

Look, smart guy, the next time the government invents a virus that kills people,

The virus didn't kill people, lazy queer. It weakened folks with underlying conditions. There was no spike in all cause mortality during covid. Deaths were CLEARLY misattributed There have been hundreds of proven cases - up to and including decapitation deaths blamed on covid.

Skans » 06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm

you might want to take the vax the same people created when they realized they let the engineered disease loose.

They hyped the disease to make pussies like you beg for help from the very folks you have ADMITTED created and loosed the virus. It worked on you. On me, not so much.

Skans » 06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm

But, when you KNOW it's a government engineered virus - YOU BETTER TAKE THE DAMN VAX, FOOL!!!

Yeah - when they set up the PROBLEM, trust them with the SOLUTION.

You're a moron.
 

Vegas » 26 Nov 2022, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2022, 5:01 pm

Great stuff. This is what I tell @Blackvegetable  when fact checker tried to debunk 2000 Mules. Fact checker was found to be lying. 

And BV, **** your deflection toward Barr. I already had that conversation with you 500 times.

You somehow expect that a medical journal should never publish more than one opinion about a subject (in this case the origins of Covid) or that it could never even publish authors that do not march in lock step shows that you do not understand how professional journals or scientific opinions work. When new evidence arises, a true scientist will always be receptive to changing his opinion.

Xavier_Onassis » 06 Apr 2023, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2023, 4:03 pm

You somehow expect that a medical journal should never publish more than one opinion about a subject (in this case the origins of Covid) or that it could never even publish authors that do not march in lock step shows that you do not understand how professional journals or scientific opinions work. When new evidence arises, a true scientist will always be receptive to changing his opinion.

No, **** ***. We expect a medical journal to not carry political water. 

There was NEVER a scholarly reason to shout down those who suggested lab origin as the more likely scenario. The Lancet was acting on politics - not medicine, fruitcake. 
 

I got the shots, I wore masks when around others, I did not get sick from Covid or suffer any symptoms at all.

I do not think that the Chinese deliberately infected anyone. They were simply incompetent at dealing about a virus that they had little knowledge.

I have found that when one can blame either conspiracy or incompetence, he latter is nearly always the best choice.

Xavier_Onassis » 06 May 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2023, 6:56 pm

I got the shots, I wore masks when around others, I did not get sick from Covid or suffer any symptoms at all.

I do not think that the Chinese deliberately infected anyone. They were simply incompetent at dealing about a virus that they had little knowledge.

I have found that when one can blame either conspiracy or incompetence, he latter is nearly always the best choice.

When there is an epidemic disease, the goal that everyone should put first it prevent people from dying, then to prevent them from spreading it. Blaming and punishing those who ostensibly caused it is way down the list.

You really  like to be rude and insulting.