It's called the first temple because it was part of a series.FOS » 27 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You did not read it very carefully. This was declared by Jeremiah the prophet and it is why the first temple was destroyed
Neo » 27 Nov 2022, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑ It's called the first temple because it was part of a series.
That is a LOT **** different.Monderegal » 27 Nov 2022, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Neat trick. If you type "define: [word]" into Google it will define words for you. define: gaslighting gives a definition that is a little skewed from my definition. I probably should use the word insult, affront, or abuse. I use it a lot when I'm writing essays.
Jews abandoned God several times in their history and suffered for it. God never abandoned them.FOS » 27 Nov 2022, 11:08 pm » wrote: ↑ okay lol. Anyway the ONLY reason jesus had to be a jew was to fulfil prophecy from daniel, Enoch, etc.
but yhwh officially broke his covenant with thr jews long before Jesus even existed
Neo » 27 Nov 2022, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Jews abandoned God several times in their history and suffered for it. God never abandoned them.
Neo » 27 Nov 2022, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Surviving as a people for 6000 years is better than what most societies have accomplished.
Neo » 27 Nov 2022, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ May want to avoid using buzzwords recently popularized and grossly overused by leftists. Usually while gaslighting themselves.
Ex: fact checkers.
Leftism is not some organic evolution of language. It is enforced from the top down and obviously is intended to make certain thoughts more difficult to articulate.Monderegal » 28 Nov 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑
Languages evolve. Some of the words Shakespeare invented.
Largely because it could rely on the "disposable" labor of millions of blacks and asians.FOS » 26 Nov 2022, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ this country became dominant as a white nationalist country. check your history.
Neo » 27 Nov 2022, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ So **** what? I am aware of the history. Aware jews were granted exceptions from usury laws so many European Jewish families became extremely wealthy on the backs of those that needed to borrow money. American jews got involved in pioneering days of moving pictures, they saw beyond their race and promoted black singers and music during the jazz era. This gave them over representation in Hollywood and music which translated into control of media. The politics of jealousy is a progressive liberal thing. I could care less that jews are over represented in the ultra wealthy class. They seem preoccupied with ensuring they are not subjected to a second Holocaust, an understandable sentiment. Crabs in a bucket mentality helps no one.
so many European Jewish families became extremely wealthy on the backs of those that needed to borrow Asians.
Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Largely because it could rely on the "disposable" labor of millions of blacks and asians.
Lovely...FOS » 28 Nov 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ nonsense. Obviously the reason whites were able to dominate other races was because of their superior technology and strategy...which was all developed in all white societies.
And the 'labor' you speak of was no more useful than say.. inventing the tractor. Which white people also invented
It literally doesn't. Machinery is superior in every way to simply a mass of bodies.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Lovely...
But it takes labor, cheap and abundant, to actually lay the track and work the fields.
It isn't worth much as theory.
Come back after you spend a few minutes sorting it out, CC.FOS » 28 Nov 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ It literally doesn't. Machinery is superior in every way to simply a mass of bodies.
Either Way...likebi said...white people being able to press these people into labor whether you think it was nice or not was in fact a thing they earned. They paid money for slaves. And slavery existed everywhere. If all it takes is slavery to make people prosper then the whole world should have prospered equally...cause the whole world used slaves.
Your narrative is simply absurd.
There you go again...tryingnto pretend you have a point when clearly you do not.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ Come back after you spend a few minutes sorting it out, CC.
True....and if Napoleon had a Panzerkampfwagen VI Königstiger at Waterloo, my croissants would be half the price.FOS » 28 Nov 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ There you go again...tryingnto pretend you have a point when clearly you do not.
production was FAR superior in the usa in 1930 than it was in 1850, despite the fact whites had become the only people on earth to abolish slavery (everyone else still had slavery)
And if shaka Zulu had a panzer 4 then you would probably be picking cotton in South East Africa right now.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ True....and if Napoleon had a Panzerkampfwagen VI Königstiger at Waterloo, my croissants would be half the price.
Yes, just as the degree of mechanization of the 1930's was unavailable in the 1860s.FOS » 28 Nov 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ And if shaka Zulu had a panzer 4 then you would probably be picking cotton in South East Africa right now.
But he didnt. And there is a reason he didnt.
Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, just as the degree of mechanization of the 1930's was unavailable in the 1860s.
Remarkable how that works.
That's really **** !