Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Non-binary vs binary = binary
Non-binary vs binary = binary
By Vegas
29 Nov 2022 2:18 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
29 Nov 2022 8:57 am
Do words spoken by one have same interpretation as those hearing them? Binary code 0-1. yes or no? self evident no by example of everyone posting on this sight using English language.Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ You're lying.
Your moron.....in your own words.
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=70970
Common language and common interests in not knowing everything about anything physically absolute. Season of reasonable doubt is about to bring the species using vocabulary to their own self destruction thinking life is more than perpetual balancing universe present and currently evolving as always did and doing here now.
Social behavior is looking more and more like last being born here as great great grandchildren will be last 5th generation arrives this species ever reproduced forward occupying space now.
All done by reasonable doubt now isn't eternity. Hell of reverse psychology been going on since dawn of civilization.
29 Nov 2022 10:06 am
What you wrongly term "binary" or "non-binary" are nothing more than developmentally defective, and/or mentally ill homo sapiensBlackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Technically you are correct.
Perhaps even figuratively.
If non-binary is represented by Pat
it could be said to represent a "unisex"...
If so, however, you must expand the "binary" to include bi and homo.
29 Nov 2022 10:14 am
why is it anything done in comedy, becomes eternal social issues in less than 20 years.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ What you wrongly term "binary" or "non-binary" are nothing more than developmentally defective, and/or mentally ill homo sapiens
29 Nov 2022 10:26 am
Shut up. You essentially said the same thing I did just a few posts back. Busted. Again!omh » 29 Nov 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ why is it anything done in comedy, becomes eternal social issues in less than 20 years.
29 Nov 2022 10:28 am
All things fit into all categories. It's a triangle or not a triangle. A great many different types of objects fit into the Not-a-Triangle category.Vegas » 28 Nov 2022, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't expect you lefties to follow the logic, this is way over your head. But at least make an effort.
If you claim non-binary, then that is a category in of itself. Therefore, we have two categories: binary and non-binary.
Since we are back to two groups, it is still binary.
29 Nov 2022 10:31 am
ScottMon » 29 Nov 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ All things fit into all categories. It's a triangle or not a triangle. A great many different types of objects fit into the Not-a-Triangle category.
TRIANGLE OR NOT A TRIANGLE ??? 
29 Nov 2022 10:32 am
It took a long time to dispel the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ What you wrongly term "binary" or "non-binary" are nothing more than developmentally defective, and/or mentally ill homo sapiens
29 Nov 2022 10:34 am
Homosexuality is a mental disorder. Thus, why it was such a struggle for Democrats to have it reclassified. Every biologically based scientist knows its a mental disorder.Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ It took a long time to dispel the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder.
29 Nov 2022 10:37 am
Enough assertions, Skans...they consistently suffer under scrutiny.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Homosexuality is a mental disorder. Thus, why it was such a struggle for Democrats to have it reclassified. Every biologically based scientist knows its a mental disorder.
What else have you got?
29 Nov 2022 10:42 am
What I've always got; what I consistently bring to the table. Logic. Science. And, the truth.Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Enough assertions, Skans...they consistently suffer under scrutiny.
What else have you got?
29 Nov 2022 10:43 am
Skans,Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ What I've always got; what I consistently bring to the table. Logic. Science. And, the truth.
Why does it consistently suffer under scrutiny?
Is it a feature or a bug?
29 Nov 2022 10:46 am
yes, your bubble of reasonable doubt is burst. Your theater of doubt exposed staging life beyond natural evolving forward corrupting everyone added to the species.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Shut up. You essentially said the same thing I did just a few posts back. Busted. Again!
29 Nov 2022 10:53 am
does a hermaphrodite has testicles or ovaries? There are birth defects in males and there are separate birth defects in females. Males get 3 degrees of severity of hypospadias, and females have what is called clitoromegaly.Warcok » 28 Nov 2022, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Your either male, female or hermaphrodite (freak)
Hermaphrodite is the third gender, no?
So does the infant with the birth defects have testicles or ovaries?
29 Nov 2022 10:57 am
I busted you like a virgin's cherry.omh » 29 Nov 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ yes, your bubble of reasonable doubt is burst. Your theater of doubt exposed staging life beyond natural evolving forward corrupting everyone added to the species.
{Image Auto-Deleted}
29 Nov 2022 10:59 am
Just because you believe it and say it hundreds of time where millions of people believe you and ignore me, doesn't make it an accurate account of time and space evolving here in plain sight.
29 Nov 2022 11:08 am
compounding 24 triangles to work spontaneously separate simultaneously existing creating perpetual balancing universe of never duplicated total sum results currently occupying space existing as never lived before and never duplicated since conceived.
https://i.postimg.cc/Z5ZDRJH1/Picture-153.jpg.
think of red facing north, pink facing south, yellow facing dawn, orange facing dusk, blue facing midnight, green facing the sun at noon.
From the core out is 8 hemispheres of doubt sustained by 6 degrees of deception. Academia, arts, politics, religions, social consensus, economics.
29 Nov 2022 12:57 pm
ScottMon » 29 Nov 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ All things fit into all categories. It's a triangle or not a triangle. A great many different types of objects fit into the Not-a-Triangle category.
Yes. But each category must be separate from each other. Otherwise, they are either the same category or a subset of one.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Nov 2022 12:59 pm
DeezerShoove » 29 Nov 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Conceiving that one infinity can be of a different size than the other is self-deception.
One has to already conclude infinity has a boundary for this to make any sense.
I lean toward my previous post concept. You can't change the value of infinity.
Infinity doesn't have a value. That's why it is infinity. If it had a value, then it would be finite. It's always growing. Think of it like trees that never stop growing. One tree can be taller than the other, and they will never be the same height at the same time.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Nov 2022 1:07 pm
I keep lookin down my pants daily.. making sure everything is normal. Seems ok.Vegas » 29 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Infinity doesn't have a value. That's why it is infinity. If it had a value, then it would be finite. It's always growing. Think of it like trees that never stop growing. One tree can be taller than the other, and they will never be the same height at the same time.
trees? I know a lot about trees? do they worry about gender TOO?
29 Nov 2022 1:16 pm
Well done Skans. Hang on, let me humiliate @Blackvegetable really quick. Hey Veghead, this is an example of an intelligent rebuttal. He thought it through, then articulated it in his own words. He didn't strike through it all and say "no." or "You're a **** idiot." Then, turn around and call that it an intelligent rebuttal. That's why nobody here takes you seriously. You are stupid. A retard. A loser. A coward. A piece of ****. A dumb mother ****.Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ There is a logical argument to be made along those lines, Vegas.
However, let's look at this another way. Numerically, there is a Binary number system and non-binary number systems, indicating there are actually many different number systems. Just because there is a binary number system and non-binary number systems does not mean there are only two types of number systems. The logical fallacy is diverting attention away from what we are actually discussing is the broader context, i.e. "number systems". Outside of the binary number system, there may be many different number systems. Follow me so far?
Now, the Leftists claim there are more than two genders/sexes (yes, the terms are historically synonymous). The logical error the Leftists make is assigning the terms "binary" and "non-binary" to something other than a number system, i.e. Homo Sapiens. The term simply does not seamlessly carry over from a classification of a particular number system to a biological species, Homo Sapiens, as they would lead you to believe.
In the context of the species called Homo Sapiens, the question is "Can there possibly be more than one sex/gender within this species"? The answer to that is yes, but, it would be very rare such a being would not likely be capable of joining with another of the species to produce viable offspring. In discussing species, we would call that a mutation, a defect or an aberration from what is biologically necessary to perpetuate the species. Many such aberrations (not necessarily sex/gender related), in the absence of modern medical intervention, would quickly die after birth, or be of no consequence to the species as a whole.
So, while I like what you have done with logic, I still view it as a "piggy-back" off of the Leftist attempt to illogically conflate a number system with a biological species.
Ok Skans. I just needed to say that, sorry. Yes, you are correct. They are taking subsets of a category, then trying to separate it into a whole different category. For example, consider:
Set A = All the even numbers.
Set B = {2, 4, 6}.
Set B is not separate from set A, it is a subset of set A.
Non-binary, according to the dopes, is a spectrum between male and female. So, in the spirit of my above example:
Set A = all genders from male to female.
Set B = Male and Female.
Thus, set B is a subset of Set A.
Set B is part of set A. It is not a separate category.
Therefore, They can't say non-binary and binary are different categories when one contains the other. The only way they can separate the two is if they acknowledge that one is a subset of the other.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 6271 users online :: 3 registered, 13 bots, and 6255 guests
Bots: ADmantX, proximic, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, DuckDuckGo, XenForo, Applebot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7