Liberal Forum

Vegas » 29 Nov 2022, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 8:56 pm

More projecting. As always.

Look at the bright side...

You have another, very compelling, reason to kill yourself.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 9:52 pm

Look at the bright side...

You have another, very compelling, reason to kill yourself.

And more projection. 

You know what you could do...you could actually make an effort to prove me wrong. 

I mean, that's what I did to you, so...

Vegas » 29 Nov 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 9:43 pm

The point is that he thinks he knows, when I had clearly shown that he didn't. Yet, with his usual arrogant conviction, he insists that he is right, as always. 

Here is the definition. His fallacy was that the article only considered 13% of Republicans (as opposed to 57% dims.). He was only focusing on the existing data of that 13%, when the sample clearly left out a huge sample of Republicans. The article even admitted that. He interpreted it as presidents who are alive. Hence, "survivorship." He was taking the word literally. I wouldn't care if he just admitted that he **** up. I would let it go. We all make mistakes, who cares? But his arrogant narcissistic retarded *** won't allow for that. Thus, I have no choice but to embarrass him.

Here is the definition. His fallacy was that the article only considered 13% of Republicans

No I didn't,  and no it doesn't. 

Lying imbecile 

He was only focusing on the existing data of that 13%, when the sample clearly left out a huge sample of Republicans

This is yet more **** gibberish, parking valet.

. The article even admitted that

This has nothing to do with "the article", you dumb piece of ****.

it is about the survey.

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:02 pm

No I didn't,  and no it doesn't. 

 

**** liar. 

Lying imbecile 

Projecting

This is yet more **** gibberish, parking valet.

More of the same ****. Learn what a proper rebuttal is. 

This has nothing to do with "the article", you dumb piece of ****.

Yes, *******. It did.

it is about the survey.

which is where we got the numbers you stupid ****.

SJConspirator » 29 Nov 2022, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 9:34 pm

I don't think anybody here understands what survivorship bias is.

Not a single post in this thread shows any understanding of it. Shockingly, BV comes the closest to explaining it

He probably read about it a couple days ago himself.

Go to wiki and search: list of bias

List of fallacies is another laugh riot.

You can pick number 17 or 71 off of either list and act like a genius.   

Vegas » 29 Nov 2022, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:04 pm

**** liar. 

Projecting

More of the same ****. Learn what a proper rebuttal is. 

Yes, *******. It did.

which is where we got the numbers you stupid ****.

Stop bluffing, **** idiot.


 

DeezerShoove » 29 Nov 2022, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:15 pm

He probably read about it a couple days ago himself.

Go to wiki and search: list of bias

List of fallacies is another laugh riot.

You can pick number 17 or 71 off of either list and act like a genius. 

No...it's much simpler than that...

I've studied statistics....you people are idiots.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:16 pm

Stop bluffing, **** idiot.

Projecting again.

DeezerShoove » 29 Nov 2022, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 9:46 pm

Was I supposed to be paying attention to this?

I thought I won the last coin toss and you were "it".

The Committee Chair will dress down the entire staff for this one.

I look forward to being dressed down. It's been too **** long - time for the blue pill...

Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2022, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:48 pm

I look forward to being dressed down. It's been too **** long - time for the blue pill...

Sir,
I can dress you down.
I am a mercenary.
I can dress you down right now.
Need proof ?      Good.
Here.
You are just a goddamned liar.
Here.
You said 100 times that Zelensky was gay.
You put up a picture.                    It was "photo-shopped".
Sir,.................You are a liar.   
You bear false witness against thy brother. ( 10 Commandments)
Here is why I know.
That picture is not Zelensky..........it is Michael Flatley with "Lord of the Dance".
Sir,
I saw that show.      Lord of the Dance.    In person.   With my wife.
MGM Show-Room.  2005.       I was there.  $300/seat.
In the audience with my Mexican wife.    She whispered in my ear, "I didn't know 
Gringos could dance like that".
I replied, "Nor did I".
That picture you showed ......was false.    Photo-Shop.     You lied upon the Earth.
You called him queer.
You bear ......"false witness".   
You have sinned......upon the Earth.

I ask for to you to apologize.
Will you do that for me ?   
If you will apologize........then,,,,,,,,,I will let it go.                           

@Squatchman  
@sooted up Cyndi  



 

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 8:25 pm

No, seriously....ask @Huey  

He understood Survivorship Bias intuitively, while on Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol in the war. 

In order to survive "on the velt" there was more to learn from the dead than those who made it home.

Damn dude,I have really hurt you.

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 6:04 pm

Stapled shut.

Vegas

Moron, idiot, stupid, imbecile, tard, fool, rectum are just vocabulary to create consensus in mob ruled realities where ancestors choose to perform as people on a higher plane of existing in plain sight. Those labeled, those labeling are the two side of organized doubt, orchestrated chaos, the academia and arts that train ancestral brains of 5 consecutive generations evolving currently become educated minds and and collective souls that won't accept their sole body and time equally occupying space as perpetual balancing will never produce fair outcomes because time will not move or change anything evolving in series parallel displacement currently unique within itself before eroding or decomposing from its one cycle present.

Smartest people I ever met or listened too always ignored a universal constant even after all the generations that claimed to rise out of the "dark ages.".

Intellectual reasonable doubt started same time vocabularies began converting ancestors into type cast social behaviors instead of a species limited to mutually evolving forward one at a time making up the 5 generations changing the population in plain sight but never beyond series parallel spontaneously evolving as ancestrally present one at a time.

Genetic outcomes are in real time eternally separated now as only alive here. My brain navigates that same time my social mind was trained to believe nobody can understand the parable, paradox, paradigm, philosophically, psychologically, physically. Yet my instincts navigates between the hypothetical values of any society civilization manifested by laws ordering compliance or else stereotyping citizens by race, creed, color, national origin, gender, ancestral position achieved after birth, social position leading or following chosen intellectual consensus.

few years ago I came up with a phrase I even did a thread about, Your mind isn't as smart as your vocabulary says it is. All you self proclaimed smarter than me characters on the world stage are as fooled as my entire ancestry have been.

I am not enlightened by doubt, hypothetical values, and hyperbole life is more than evolving as my singularity exists as a one time cycled reproduction here but I do see by removing intellectual doubt, those that never knew because they don't want to know more than traditionally believed can see what corruption created can work within being completely honest about oneself.

Just not under tradition methods of arranging outcomes to benefit the minority in charge of global economic value one becomes to humanity.

Blackvegetable » 29 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm

The most famous example of survivorship bias dates back to World War Two. At the time, the American military asked mathematician Abraham Wald to study how best to protect airplanes from being shot down. The military knew armour would help, but couldn’t protect the whole plane or would be too heavy to fly well. Initially, their plan had been to examine the planes returning from combat, see where they were hit the worst – the wings, around the tail gunner and down the centre of the body – and then reinforce those areas. 

But Wald realised they had fallen prey to survivorship bias, because their analysis was missing a valuable part of the picture: the planes that were hit but that hadn’t made it back. As a result, the military were planning to armour precisely the wrong parts of the planes. The bullet holes they were looking at actually indicated the areas a plane could be hit and keep flying – exactly the areas that didn't need reinforcing.

https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20 ... e-mistakes

Bump.

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am

Bump.

Drop kick. #56 of this thread.

Selaphobia » 30 Nov 2022, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 7:18 am

retell the story about PP's plan on going to Canada to avoid being drafted.

Dad said “boy, you ain’t got what it takes to be man.  I’ll take you to Canada if need be.”  And you smiled and said, “yes, daddy, I am your little ******.”

Taipan » 30 Nov 2022, 3:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 3:34 am

Here is why I know.
That picture is not Zelensky..........it is Michael Flatley with "Lord of the Dance".
 

How can you be so sure it was Flatley, you cum-guzzling queer, and not Elizabeth Warren?

Your mother is photo-shopped, chisel-chest. Thanks for proving you're retarded, you **** ape.     

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqHzlNHl0Xo

Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2022, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2022, 10:48 pm

I look forward to being dressed down. It's been too **** long - time for the blue pill...

My bantam rooster is like that.
He feels the need for a garden implement to be whipped at him sometimes.

**** thing stands by windows now.
He knows I hate reglazing every time he digs up the flowers.

Evil but smart...

Huey » 30 Nov 2022, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 8:06 am

Dad said “boy, you ain’t got what it takes to be man.  I’ll take you to Canada if need be.”  And you smiled and said, “yes, daddy, I am your little ******.”

I hear a veteran, "disabled" stateside, yapping bitterly.


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 8:32 am

I hear a veteran, "disabled" stateside, yapping bitterly.

I watch an ancestor deny their genetic time mutually evolving as situated reproductively here exactly being eternally separated equally as anything and everything outside his flesh and bones. Not the only one practicing the behavior.

More do than don't, more on corruption that living as honestly alive.

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2022, 8:32 am

I hear a veteran, "disabled" stateside, yapping bitterly.

Where do you hear that?