Nutin' honey.
I get concerned about brain damaagege...
Only by proxy. Unless you have a child going under the knife you really don't.
Let's examine that. By that logic, I have no business opposing slavery, unless I or someone I know is enslaved.DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Only by proxy. Unless you have a child going under the knife you really don't.
That IS the same as the women telling men to shut up about abortion, basically.
Your crocodile tears don't count.
I'm antidisestablishmentarian-ish. Except when I'm in a good mood.Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2022, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's examine that. By that logic, I have no business opposing slavery, unless I or someone I know is enslaved.
You a libertarian or something?
Well, whatever handle you use, you SEEM to be suggesting that no one should have an opinion about how we should treat children unless their opinion concerns THEIR child. That seems a tad awkward, to me.DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm antidisestablishmentarian-ish. Except when I'm in a good mood.
There's something about libertarians that puts me off a bit.Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2022, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, whatever handle you use, you SEEM to be suggesting that no one should have an opinion about how we should treat children unless their opinion concerns THEIR child. That seems a tad awkward, to me.
I don't believe you could live with your own position. Which is the thing with libertarians. Questioned closely, they reveal that under their own set of rules, they would resort to violence against law abiding neighbors.
I agree to a point. Just as I agree you're on your own to a point. And live and let live to a point.DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2022, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ There's something about libertarians that puts me off a bit.
Like a lot of people, there are features that appear to be ok, a supposed "live and let live".
But sometimes there's also a "you're on your own".
Both of these seem to be compatible with each other but can collide too.
I know there's a book describing what exactly a libertarian is but that's more than an answer.
A book shouldn't be needed to say it.
btw
"Treating a child" is a very broad area.
How we do it should be let alone as much as possible.
The family ways should trump outside interference in general. Do you agree?
Well, that's what I start to wonder about.Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2022, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree to a point. Just as I agree you're on your own to a point. And live and let live to a point.
Start choppin' their genitals and we're beyond that point.
Jews back male circumcision. They oppose female circumcision.DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, that's what I start to wonder about.
Removing a bit of flesh from a baby boy's penis is acceptable.
The similar procedure for a girl's downstairs area? Not.
Both are traditional rituals.
If the boy's operation went beyond and "ruined" him, I'd say we'd agree it's too far.
Likewise for girls. That becomes mutilation.
How one became a ruinous sabotage and the other not must have to do with the second-class status women "enjoy" in some cultures.
Is there still a valid traditional female circumcision in the world these days (if there ever was)?
I sure don't know.
I also won't count on anyone here knowing the difference either.
So, you acknowledge it as traditional.Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2022, 11:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Jews back male circumcision. They oppose female circumcision.
They run this joint.
Next mystery, please.
My understanding is that science backs it - less infections, less vd's. Maybe less of The Cyancah.
I read something about it decades ago...Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ My understanding is that science backs it - less infections, less vd's. Maybe less of The Cyancah.
But I certainly never said it's not traditional - it's pretty common knowledge that it's straight out of Leviticus, in the case of the male version. Idunno where the female comes from. Not the jeeeews.
Pure brainwashed garbage.Misty » 30 Nov 2022, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Transgender people usually know they are born in the wrong body from an early age.
Their chances of being more accepted in the gender they identify as are much improved if they don't go through puberty.
If they transition after puberty they are much more likely to be subjected to ridicule by people like you.
BingoCannonpointer » 30 Nov 2022, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "Usually" - that's a very sciency word, there.
It isn't my ridicule but your crocodile "compassion" that kills the victims of your brainwashed ideology.
If a-rabs DID assimilate, we would be worse off.DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I read something about it decades ago...
Please remember I'm by Dearborn, AYE-rab Central, USA.
There were honor killings, beheadings, goats roasting in backyards, Trans Am's with TeeTops, etc.
Culture shock coupled with at-least-they're-not-Deetroit-******...
Years of non-assimilation (continuing today) has tainted my outlook.
Jews didn't seem to factor in much.
It grants sexual agency to children - not just brainwashing, but pedophilic brainwashing.
Okie dokie, mincy.Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2022, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ If a-rabs DID assimilate, we would be worse off.
You have not assimilated. I have not. Why would we want them to?