Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
A more realistic measure of 'economy'
A more realistic measure of 'economy'
By FOS
1 Dec 2022 9:13 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Dec 2022 2:50 pm
What do you mean?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
1 Dec 2022 2:51 pm
things that can maintain replacement birth rates
1 Dec 2022 2:54 pm
Teaching a society why not having kids if you can't afford them is hopeless. Especially our society. Our government writes checks for some mothers per kid.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
1 Dec 2022 2:59 pm
Thank you ronald milhouse reagan. He was the one who introduced the term service economy and oversaw the deindustrialization of Murka.FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ So sorry guys...but using a more tangible and real way to measure the economy. The modern usa seems like the poorest country in the history ofbthe world.
Seriously.
All of your graphs and money printing and whatever other crap you wanna do or talk about simply isn't working. We are a dying population, BECAUSE we are poor. Because we are far more poor than any African country with an exploding population.
This seemed to occur along with the loss of manufacturing in this country.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 Dec 2022 3:01 pm
Not eve a six titted she-boon could pull that one off.FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ 600k? No. Perhaps I am unclear on what 1% is exactly. We both make about 200k/year. That is enough to live decently in a nice part of the city...but she isn't gonna have a million saved up for retirement...and my income comes from my savings so I can't spend it
But let's think about what you are saying. A person in the 1% is only 1% of the population...so they would need to have what...200 children?
women cant do that.
Where are the mormons when we need them?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 Dec 2022 3:45 pm
If you are that rich? do you really need to care?FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ i have too much money to apply. trust me, i have tried.
the last time i had health insurance it cost 1.5k per month.
too much.
and that was like what...5 years ago?
you may be better off.
know why..
you could make your're own decisions if you get sick. trust me- you would be better off!
boo 
1 Dec 2022 5:39 pm
Vegas » 01 Dec 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Teaching a society why not having kids if you can't afford them is hopeless. Especially our society. Our government writes checks for some mothers per kid.
the goal is to build a society that can reproduce, not tell everybody they can't afford to. You are sounding like the NWO globalist
1 Dec 2022 5:44 pm
as techno abundance increases, it becomes harder to keep people in desperate poverty. Hence the bailouts, the extreme brainwashing etc.. tactics to control the populace become more insane and manic
1 Dec 2022 5:53 pm
Precisely. They have to ENGINEER emergencies.SJConspirator » 01 Dec 2022, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ as techno abundance increases, it becomes harder to keep people in desperate poverty. Hence the bailouts, the extreme brainwashing etc.. tactics to control the populace become more insane and manic
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 Dec 2022 7:48 pm
SJConspirator » 01 Dec 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ the goal is to build a society that can reproduce, not tell everybody they can't afford to. You are sounding like the NWO globalist
Go back and reread what I said and ty to figure out what I said and what I didn't say.
God man.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Dec 2022 2:34 am
Because idiots like you keep voting for **** RNC tools who make sure all the tax brackets are kept at the bottom while letting the elitely overpaid skate on progressive taxation that the rest of US have to pay.FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ So sorry guys...but using a more tangible and real way to measure the economy. The modern usa seems like the poorest country in the history ofbthe world.
Seriously.
All of your graphs and money printing and whatever other crap you wanna do or talk about simply isn't working. We are a dying population, BECAUSE we are poor. Because we are far more poor than any African country with an exploding population.
This seemed to occur along with the loss of manufacturing in this country.
2 Dec 2022 5:50 am
supraTruth4 » 02 Dec 2022, 3:34 am » wrote: ↑ Because idiots like you keep voting for **** RNC tools who make sure all the tax brackets are kept at the bottom while letting the elitely overpaid skate on progressive taxation that the rest of US have to pay.
I don't vote. I certainly would not vote dnc because I'm white and not stupid
2 Dec 2022 6:06 am
Children are merely infrastructure.Vegas » 01 Dec 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I would say it's far more than 50% that can't afford it. They have kids anyway, though they can't afford to support them adequately. Thus, the government writes them checks.
America, generally speaking, has been founded on the idea that everyone should have equal opportunity to attain their own wealth. This is a beautiful theory, but hardly crosses over to application. As soon as we liberated ourselves from Britain, we used exploitation, not freedom for all, as a means to accumulate wealth. It hasn't changed. Therefore, there will always be more than 50% who left out to dry.
Just like a freeway or a sewer system, we all play for the **** things.
All the "we're already socialists" types should find this sentiment logical.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
2 Dec 2022 6:21 am
Vegas » 01 Dec 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I would say it's far more than 50% that can't afford it. They have kids anyway, though they can't afford to support them adequately. Thus, the government writes them checks.
America, generally speaking, has been founded on the idea that everyone should have equal opportunity to attain their own wealth. This is a beautiful theory, but hardly crosses over to application. As soon as we liberated ourselves from Britain, we used exploitation, not freedom for all, as a means to accumulate wealth. It hasn't changed. Therefore, there will always be more than 50% who left out to dry.
I agree that far more than 50% cannot afford it. And that means this country is literally dying of poverty. We are many times more poor than bangladesh, for example. All the silly measures like gdp do not matter...the bottom line is that the vast majority of people in the usa cannot afford to reproduce while in Bangladesh they can afford 6 children per family on average. Whatever the reason for that...cost of living...higher wages...whatever. they have a far superior economy to the usa.
2 Dec 2022 9:05 am
Good, because NAZI scum like you are to racist anyway.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ I don't vote. I certainly would not vote dnc because I'm white and not stupid
2 Dec 2022 9:05 am
I kind of agree with BV (gasp!). His numbers don’t add up.Cedar » 01 Dec 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ If she make 200 G and can't squirrel away a milly by retirement she need rehab.
1) First of all, 400k is not top 1%.
2) The guy admitted he lives off his savings, so his income is $0 technically. And if it is $200k based on investment income, then he’s at $3million plus’s in savings and can afford a kid.
3) I’ve made this argument many times. Even if you are minimum wage, you can invest enough in your 401k to retire a millionaire. His GF is making bad decisions.
2 Dec 2022 9:47 am
Young people in their 20s surely could raise a family without gvt assistance but, these days it would most likely be conditional. Couples working and conducting their behaviors in the same direction, external family help, ect, ect.FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ I mean...people should be reproducing in their 20s. Biologically speaking that is when you should do it. And historically it is when we all did.
Now what % of the population in their 20s could afford to have a family without gvt assistence?
It seems like close to 0%
And if you are white from a normal family, you aren't gonna be getting gvt assistance.
What does that mean?? The whole country is dying of poverty.. that is all.
…..if you are earning 200k a year, you’re blessed.
2 Dec 2022 9:49 am
I do not agree that they could. It is completely out of reach for most people.jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Young people in their 20s surely could raise a family without gvt assistance but, these days it would most likely be conditional. Couples working and conducting their behaviors in the same direction, external family help, ect, ect.
…..if you are earning 200k a year, you’re blessed.
2 Dec 2022 10:02 am
With you dead set on anyone being able too, how could anyone when facing organizing protests against those that have. the grand illusion life exceeds genetically mutually evolving forward now.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ I do not agree that they could. It is completely out of reach for most people.
2 Dec 2022 10:12 am
….can understand your position. The environment is NOT ideal for young couples starting up a family, true enough.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ I do not agree that they could. It is completely out of reach for most people.
…..with a little faith people will tend to find a way…
Who is online
In total there are 4376 users online :: 7 registered, 14 bots, and 4355 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Buck Naked, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, nefarious101
Bots: curl/7, Collector, proximic, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, CriteoBot, ADmantX, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google