Nope. Not many. And this is by design. White people are just supposed to stop reproducing and be replaced by other people.jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ ….can understand your position. The environment is NOT ideal for young couples starting up a family, true enough.
…..with a little faith people will tend to find a way…
understanding the situation does more than any belief ever has. Fall back on the old adage God helps those that help themselves to working in balance rather than conquering space time continuums.jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ ….can understand your position. The environment is NOT ideal for young couples starting up a family, true enough.
…..with a little faith people will tend to find a way…
….if the design is intentional, then that isn’t good, imo. There are forces that want continual power and will replace whites and blacks or whoever in order to attain it.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. Not many. And this is by design. White people are just supposed to stop reproducing and be replaced by other people.
….you were doing ok then, you went abstract on me. …sigh…omh » 02 Dec 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ understanding the situation does more than any belief ever has. Fall back on the old adage God helps those that help themselves to working in balance rather than conquering space time continuums.
Well most people consider genocide to be a bad thing. It is only a bit controversial to oppose the genocide of whites, since we are subhuman.jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ ….if the design is intentional, then that isn’t good, imo. There are forces that want continual power and will replace whites and blacks or whoever in order to attain it.
…..genocide of whites is coming about how? Who told you were subhuman?….I’m not for any of this here…..FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Well most people consider genocide to be a bad thing. It is only a bit controversial to oppose the genocide of whites, since we are subhuman.
“By this means (fractional reserve banking) government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft.”– John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1920)https://www.globalresearch.ca/famous-qu ... oney/25812FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry.. but the way most of you people talk about the economy is complete rubbish. I am quite tired of all debates over whether we are in a 'recession' and nonsense like that. All your numbers and charts and graphs are irrelevant and fake and stupid.
Here's the bottom line; Humans are life forms. In order for us to 'break even' ...everyone needs to have an average of slightly more than one child (slightly more to account for untimely death)...or slightly more than 2 per couple
and they need to have a decent quality of life.
That means
1) a single income household (somebody has to raise, cook,clean, change diapers, etc)
2) their own house
3) a decent education
4) a decently safe neighborhood...being able to actually play in the backyard without getting abducted raped and killed
5) the ability to retire and survive as some point (70 or so)
And you know...whatever else is a basic necessity.
That needs to be the AVERAGE. Maybe there is wealth inequality. Say 50% of the people cannot afford this. Then the other 50% need to be able to have 4 children...and they also would need to actually do it...since a bunch of rich infertile people will still cause population decline.
Such a 50/50 division would be cause for serious concern, however...since the survivors would be increasingly inbred and the people who failed to reproduce may have been poor for reasons other than being useless, and their heritable traits are being lost to the gene pool.
Now since we survive, it is clear that EVERY European society in history was able to manage this. You might think the English of the 12th century were desperately poor, but they could manage the above stipulations...and even better...since their population grew
what about the usa? What % of our housholds can afford 2 children with a decent quality of life?
I'm sorry...but just my personal experience of the cost of raising children decently and living in a decent area...I can't help but feel like less than 10% of thr people can even afford it. Me and my gf are bothe technically in the 1%, and we would struggle to afford such a thing. I can't get health insurance...and she only just recently paid off student loans.
jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ …..genocide of whites is coming about how? Who told you were subhuman?….I’m not for any of this here…..
Bangaldesh:FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ I agree that far more than 50% cannot afford it. And that means this country is literally dying of poverty. We are many times more poor than bangladesh, for example. All the silly measures like gdp do not matter...the bottom line is that the vast majority of people in the usa cannot afford to reproduce while in Bangladesh they can afford 6 children per family on average. Whatever the reason for that...cost of living...higher wages...whatever. they have a far superior economy to the usa.
Well why not?DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Bangaldesh:
Exports of garments and shrimp plus remittances from Bangladeshis working abroad provide the country's three main sources of foreign exchange income.
---
Yeah, real strong...
There's no mention of the dollar. Just remittances...FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Well why not?
yeah...a dollar goes a lot further in Bangladesh than it does here because they do not have a **** economy like us.
…..soon, no one will be free….FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ well the standard opinion of jewish elites is the same as Susan Sontag, noel ignatiev, etc.
and the whole purpose of all western governments, paid puppets of jewish power, is to manage a decline in the population people without alerting them to the fact it is happening
Well so what? They can afford to not only survive, but they can even manage to grow their population.DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ There's no mention of the dollar. Just remittances...
The country is a **** flood plane. ANYTHING is worth something there.
Yeah, but it's so yucky...FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Well so what? They can afford to not only survive, but they can even manage to grow their population.
No European country can afford that.
Lol they have houses in Bangladesh.DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, but it's so yucky...
Why is it a measure of success that you can pump out kids that merely survive?
If they lived in a moderately cool environment they wouldn't "succeed" because they couldn't afford to build adequate shelter.
Keeping a kid in clothes is easier when it's a loincloth.
The weather is their best friend, not their economy.
what abstract? self evident kinetic genetic evolving in plain sight.jefftec » 02 Dec 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ ….you were doing ok then, you went abstract on me. …sigh…
I think that's a great insight!DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, but it's so yucky...
Why is it a measure of success that you can pump out kids that merely survive?
If they lived in a moderately cool environment they wouldn't "succeed" because they couldn't afford to build adequate shelter.
Keeping a kid in clothes is easier when it's a loincloth.
The weather is their best friend, not their economy.
Pricing people out of basic living expenses is another one of (((their))) not-so-guilty pleasures. I can already imagine this scenario in my head:FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry.. but the way most of you people talk about the economy is complete rubbish. I am quite tired of all debates over whether we are in a 'recession' and nonsense like that. All your numbers and charts and graphs are irrelevant and fake and stupid.
Here's the bottom line; Humans are life forms. In order for us to 'break even' ...everyone needs to have an average of slightly more than one child (slightly more to account for untimely death)...or slightly more than 2 per couple
and they need to have a decent quality of life.
That means
1) a single income household (somebody has to raise, cook,clean, change diapers, etc)
2) their own house
3) a decent education
4) a decently safe neighborhood...being able to actually play in the backyard without getting abducted raped and killed
5) the ability to retire and survive as some point (70 or so)
And you know...whatever else is a basic necessity.
That needs to be the AVERAGE. Maybe there is wealth inequality. Say 50% of the people cannot afford this. Then the other 50% need to be able to have 4 children...and they also would need to actually do it...since a bunch of rich infertile people will still cause population decline.
Such a 50/50 division would be cause for serious concern, however...since the survivors would be increasingly inbred and the people who failed to reproduce may have been poor for reasons other than being useless, and their heritable traits are being lost to the gene pool.
Now since we survive, it is clear that EVERY European society in history was able to manage this. You might think the English of the 12th century were desperately poor, but they could manage the above stipulations...and even better...since their population grew
what about the usa? What % of our housholds can afford 2 children with a decent quality of life?
I'm sorry...but just my personal experience of the cost of raising children decently and living in a decent area...I can't help but feel like less than 10% of thr people can even afford it. Me and my gf are bothe technically in the 1%, and we would struggle to afford such a thing. I can't get health insurance...and she only just recently paid off student loans.
According to progressive "follow the science" geniuses, you are a CUNSPEARISEE theerizt!
human race had no problem advancing from the caves. today, there is a specialized economy. all, that most people know what to do is their specialized job, and how to wipe their butt. the specialized economy will fall! and those with primitive skills will let the specialist starve. love it. so great. give me lots of land. let the buffalo roam. never to see another human is my dream.FOS » 01 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry.. but the way most of you people talk about the economy is complete rubbish. I am quite tired of all debates over whether we are in a 'recession' and nonsense like that. All your numbers and charts and graphs are irrelevant and fake and stupid.
Here's the bottom line; Humans are life forms. In order for us to 'break even' ...everyone needs to have an average of slightly more than one child (slightly more to account for untimely death)...or slightly more than 2 per couple
and they need to have a decent quality of life.
That means
1) a single income household (somebody has to raise, cook,clean, change diapers, etc)
2) their own house
3) a decent education
4) a decently safe neighborhood...being able to actually play in the backyard without getting abducted raped and killed
5) the ability to retire and survive as some point (70 or so)
And you know...whatever else is a basic necessity.
That needs to be the AVERAGE. Maybe there is wealth inequality. Say 50% of the people cannot afford this. Then the other 50% need to be able to have 4 children...and they also would need to actually do it...since a bunch of rich infertile people will still cause population decline.
Such a 50/50 division would be cause for serious concern, however...since the survivors would be increasingly inbred and the people who failed to reproduce may have been poor for reasons other than being useless, and their heritable traits are being lost to the gene pool.
Now since we survive, it is clear that EVERY European society in history was able to manage this. You might think the English of the 12th century were desperately poor, but they could manage the above stipulations...and even better...since their population grew
what about the usa? What % of our housholds can afford 2 children with a decent quality of life?
I'm sorry...but just my personal experience of the cost of raising children decently and living in a decent area...I can't help but feel like less than 10% of thr people can even afford it. Me and my gf are bothe technically in the 1%, and we would struggle to afford such a thing. I can't get health insurance...and she only just recently paid off student loans.