Maybe that's the answer in YOUR feeble mind, but everyone with a brain can easily see that:
No...this is why it's pointless.ConsRule » 05 Dec 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ That's a forecast...real data is needed. And that is just one. Besides, losses are not necessarily debt (as someone as "smart" as you are should know). Keep going.
Zeet,Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe that's the answer in YOUR feeble mind, but everyone with a brain can easily see that:
A: You can't read an official government chart
B: You're such an ignorant and radical liberal that you can never admit when you've been wrong and completely humiliated.
So, you STILL don't know how to read a simple government chart?
It's not my fault you let your mouth overload your ***.Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ No...this is why it's pointless.
It shows HISTORICAL data for free cash flow.
that's what you have left after you've settled all accounts.
The *** can't/won't because that would expose his leftist lies and ignorance...Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ So, you STILL don't know how to read a simple government chart?
Tell me IN WHICH YEAR, 2022 or 2019 was there a higher US production of oil IN EVERY MONTH, since you stupidly claimed otherwise?
Do you understand what flowcharts are designed to accomplish socially? explain your yes or no answer. Because I can and have done so many, many times.Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ So, you STILL don't know how to read a simple government chart?
Tell me IN WHICH YEAR, 2022 or 2019 was there a higher US production of oil IN EVERY MONTH, since you stupidly claimed otherwise?
You couldn't even read the exhibit, and have no clue what negative free cash flow means.
You still haven't proven your assertion. Of course, nobody here thought you would. You're well know for MSU, then diverting and making demands when called on it.Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2022, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ You couldn't even read the exhibit, and have no clue what negative free cash flow means.
here it is in narrative form.
More than 230 North American oil and gas producers, owing at least $152 billion in debt, have filed for bankruptcy since the beginning of 2015, according to the latest report from law firm Haynes & Boone. In the second quarter alone, companies that went bankrupt had total debts of $29 billion. The restructurings are showing no signs of letting up, as June tied for the busiest month on record with seven oil and gas bankruptcies, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That month, the shale bust marked a grim milestone by claiming the pioneer of America’s drilling renaissance, Chesapeake Energy Corp. For other parts of the shale supply chain, 2020 is also on pace to be the biggest year of bankruptcies in terms of debt owed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... story.html
you idiots are ineducable.
What do you insist I have to prove?ConsRule » 05 Dec 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ You still haven't proven your assertion. Of course, nobody here thought you would. You're well know for MSU, then diverting and making demands when called on it.
Do you really mean to say that you need an explanation when comparing oil production yields between two years when the factual numbers are clearly listed for each month, and every one of the 12 months in 2022 (and the last several in 2021) showed all lower oil production than each month in 2019?Nostradamus'omh » 05 Dec 2022, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ Do you understand what flowcharts are designed to accomplish socially? explain your yes or no answer. Because I can and have done so many, many times.
wow, change the narrative of what I said to how you interpret what I say. your mind isn't as smart as your social consensus says it became ignoring now is eternity.Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ Do you really mean to say that you need an explanation when comparing oil production yields between two years when the factual numbers are clearly listed for each month, and every one of the 12 months in 2022 (and the last several in 2021) showed all lower oil production than each month in 2019?
I thought only ignorant libs like BV were so inept.
Probably too late to prevent such an exposure after the dozens of examples we have that prove how ignorant he is!Buffalo » 05 Dec 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ The *** can't/won't because that would expose his leftist lies and ignorance...
When you're responding to MY post and not referring to any other, isn't it natural to believe you're response is intended to obtain an answer from me?Nostradamus'omh » 05 Dec 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ wow, change the narrative of what I said to how you interpret what I say. your mind isn't as smart as your social consensus says it became ignoring now is eternity.
Let me demonstrate how **** stupid you areZeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ Do you really mean to say that you need an explanation when comparing oil production yields between two years when the factual numbers are clearly listed for each month, and every one of the 12 months in 2022 (and the last several in 2021) showed all lower oil production than each month in 2019?
I thought only ignorant libs like BV were so inept.
You apply what you believe true to be in the minds of everyone preferring to suggest life isn't eternally separated in plain sight. You ever think your entire ancestry was misled and figure out what still misleads the remaining, including your own time lived to current events changing everything like never before again?Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ When you're responding to MY post and not referring to any other, isn't it natural to believe you're response is intended to obtain an answer from me?
Sorry if my response mistakenly offended you.
Hey stupid! My initial response in this thread (#86) was to your fellow ignorant liberal Ike, who posted a completely irrelevant and idiotic comparison of US oil production in 2008 compared to 2022. That is, until YOU stuck your stupid nose into it and responded by calling MY responding facts untrue, after you clearly didn't even look at the chart I posted. It had NOTHING TO DO with oil PRICES, it had to do with oil PRODUCTION, fool! There was NOTHING about which president did what, nor about which state produced more OR about which state regulated what, or whether that production came from private or federal lands!Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Let me demonstrate how **** stupid you are
A) The fairytale notwithstanding, Grifty's term ended in January, 2021.
B) In August 2020, Grifty agreed to REDUCE US output for 2 years
C) If you are showing output by State, you are looking at production on private land, which is regulated by individual states - not by the federal government.
Why do you compare to 2019?Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2022, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Hey stupid! My initial response in this thread (#86) was to your fellow ignorant liberal Ike, who posted a completely irrelevant and idiotic comparison of US oil production in 2008 compared to 2022. That is, until YOU stuck your stupid nose into it and responded by calling MY responding facts untrue, after you clearly didn't even look at the chart I posted. It had NOTHING TO DO with oil PRICES, it had to do with oil PRODUCTION, fool! There was NOTHING about which president did what, nor about which state produced more OR about which state regulated what, or whether that production came from private or federal lands!
If you're determined to do nothing but insert your own irrelevant and pointless diversions, you'd think you would have learned by now how ignorant you look when you hopelessly fail in your attempt to appear to be such a maven!
And if you're dumb enough to STILL want to continue claiming anything to the contrary, just pick ANY MONTH in 2019 and tell me if we produced more or less oil than the corresponding month in 2022.
Otherwise, shut the **** up and stop being such an inane drone.
Simple, nitwit! It was the most recent year that was unaffected by the anomaly of the pandemic.