What a ****, liberal idiot you are ikey!!!IkeBana » 03 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Bull **** hockey...
PROFITS...THAT'S ALL IT IS...OBSCENE BIG OIL PROFITS. AND THIS IS ONLY FOR ONE QUARTER, MULTIPLY THESE NUMBERS BY FOUR THAT'S THE APPROXIMATE YEARLY PROFIT.
Mixed Cluster B Personality Disorder. You're histrionic, girlfriend.Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ You're a nuthouse orderly who doesn't know a male patient from a female, fruity.
When are you ridiculous, infantilized saps going to understand why no adult respects you?
Looks like they have a friend at 1600, ****.IkeBana » 03 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Bull **** hockey...
PROFITS...THAT'S ALL IT IS...OBSCENE BIG OIL PROFITS. AND THIS IS ONLY FOR ONE QUARTER, MULTIPLY THESE NUMBERS BY FOUR THAT'S THE APPROXIMATE YEARLY PROFIT.
Would a **** MAGA/Q-ANON racist like you prefer that? I can do that.Buffalo » 03 Dec 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Why aren't you bitching about the obscene profits of big pharma and big tech, you communist?
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ There is a ton of stupid here...
why not post the data to which you refer?
oh, yea.....statistics - in a statistics driven industry - are "useless"....prices tell us nothing about the state of the market.
you're a **** idiot, Zeet.
Quick, make my case that you are not even competent to suss male from female, fruity.
I'm a dude, ****.
Oh my God. You still think that's what it means.Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ only if you assume people are subject to Survival and.....uhhhh.....NotSurvival.
"you cannot but be awed by the pure, incandescent unteachability of these people"
You need to accept that it IS what it means.Vegas » 03 Dec 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh my God. You still think that's what it means.
Your bolded comment identifies you to the letter.
Unspeakable stupidity. Just...just...stupid. There is no other way to put it.
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You need to accept that it IS what it means.
And stop trying to bluff.
And you dont do so well!IkeBana » 03 Dec 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I'm a mental health professional numbnuts. Headcases like you are my business.
Stop bluffing.Vegas » 03 Dec 2022, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Siggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh....I gave you the definition from the statisticians themselves.
It's not meant to be taken literally, as in people who are alive. It's about the data that has survived, not literally whether people are alive or dead.
Nod....
in WWII, allied forces studied planes that survived being shot to discern armor placement. By neglecting bullet holes on lost planes, they missed armoring planes’ most vulnerable areas.It's not meant to be taken literally
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop bluffing.
in WWII, allied forces studied planes that survived being shot to discern armor placement. By neglecting bullet holes on lost planes, they missed armoring planes’ most vulnerable areas.
What is the "invisible subgroup" in the above example?
Illinois has a *** gas tax.Selaphobia » 02 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ 2.54.9 at costco today. If you don't believe me, see this.
Ike, you should be asking Illinois why they have some of the HIGHEST gas taxes in the NATION
Illinois has the 2nd HIGHEST TAXES in the NATION at 78.0c a gallon. California has the highest at 86.6c a gallon
Independence Day travel will return to pre-pandemic levels this weekend, reminding Illinoisans they pay the most for gas in the Midwest thanks to high taxes.
Is a dope like you trying to claim that picking a year like 2008 to compare to today's oil production is more useful or relevant than comparing the most recent year of production? Of what relevance is selecting a date of 15 years ago for comparison when data from the pre-Covid year of 2019 is so easy to obtain?Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ There is a ton of stupid here...
why not post the data to which you refer?
oh, yea.....statistics - in a statistics driven industry - are "useless"....prices tell us nothing about the state of the market.
you're a **** idiot, Zeet.
Now go ahead and admit that you lied, before we once again demonstrate that you don't know anythingZeets2 » 04 Dec 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Is a dope like you trying to claim that picking a year like 2008 to compare to today's oil production is more useful or relevant than comparing the most recent year of production? Of what relevance is selecting a date of 15 years ago for comparison when data from the pre-Covid year of 2019 is so easy to obtain?
Any how is it that you're too dumb to find that information out for your ignorant self?:
US ENERGY INFORMATIONADMINISTRATION
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus2&f=m
He cherry picks data. Does it in most discussions.Zeets2 » 04 Dec 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Is a dope like you trying to claim that picking a year like 2008 to compare to today's oil production is more useful or relevant than comparing the most recent year of production? Of what relevance is selecting a date of 15 years ago for comparison when data from the pre-Covid year of 2019 is so easy to obtain?
Any how is it that you're too dumb to find that information out for your ignorant self?:
US ENERGY INFORMATIONADMINISTRATION
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus2&f=m
I lied about nothing, dickhead, and I've proven you're too dumb to know how to read an official US chart!Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Now go ahead and admit that you lied, before we once again demonstrate that you don't know anything
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop bluffing.
in WWII, allied forces studied planes that survived being shot to discern armor placement. By neglecting bullet holes on lost planes, they missed armoring planes’ most vulnerable areas.
What is the "invisible subgroup" in the above example?
Nope. That implies doing his own research.