Liberal Forum

IkeBana » 05 Dec 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:33 am

Then prepare to live a life of frustration.  Nobody but nazis want nazis.  There aren't enough of you, and your message isnt gonna convince anybody who isn’t already a nazi headcase.  Your will?  BWAAAHAHAH!  Your will is for ****.  You spend your days on a **** internet forum.

Aren't enough of us?

Population is irrelevant dude. There arent many jews, either...but they currently rule you 
 
 

Ike Bana » 05 Dec 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:33 am

Then prepare to live a life of frustration.  Nobody but nazis want nazis.  There aren't enough of you, and your message isnt gonna convince anybody who isn’t already a nazi headcase.  Your will?  BWAAAHAHAH!  Your will is for ****.  You spend your days on a **** internet forum.  
 
 
 

Like you live a life frustrated with only existing in the skin you occupy space with.

FOS » 05 Dec 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:12 am

whether there are 2 sexes is not a question of culture. It is just a biological fact. Wikipedia is wrong, and so is the Oxford dictionary

What you're saying is the biological fact of two sexes precludes the possibility of binary gender. Would you prefer a different word for it? That's the
problem with this argument. The spat is about language, a refusal to accept a word that accommodates someone's gender identification if it differs
from the person's biological identification.

jack » 05 Dec 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:43 am

What you're saying is the biological fact of two sexes precludes the possibility of binary gender. Would you prefer a different word for it? That's the
problem with this argument. The spat is about language, a refusal to accept a word that accommodates someone's gender identification if it differs
from the person's biological identification.

Uh..yes...this is about language. That is what the op said.

the biological fact of two semesters does indeed mean that a feminine man is still a man. 

because a person's gender identification is in their brain, and it doesn't make them grow a uterus. 

FOS » 05 Dec 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:52 am

Uh..yes...this is about language. That is what the op said.

the biological fact of two semesters does indeed mean that a feminine man is still a man. 

because a person's gender identification is in their brain, and it doesn't make them grow a uterus. 

why didn't you use mind instead of brain.

FOS » 05 Dec 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:52 am

Uh..yes...this is about language. That is what the op said.

the biological fact of two semesters does indeed mean that a feminine man is still a man. 

because a person's gender identification is in their brain, and it doesn't make them grow a uterus.

A "feminine man" doesn't claim otherwise if you're referencing biology. The point is gender as a broader term as it is a different word.

jack » 05 Dec 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 11:48 am

A "feminine man" doesn't claim otherwise if you're referencing biology. The point is gender as a broader term as it is a different word.

Well I personally do not think the word gender has any meaning outside of linguistics. As I mentioned early in the thread...the idea of gender with regard to identity was a product of the imagination of a psychopath named John money.

But I think you are missing the point in the op, again.

Vegas claims that lefties claim that because there is a gender spectrum, it means there is no male or female.

And that is a trivial continuum fallacy

it would also make it impossible for a man to identify as a woman but uh...I gave up trying to understand *** logic long ago.

FOS » 05 Dec 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:37 am

Aren't enough of us?

Population is irrelevant dude. There arent many jews, either...but they currently rule you

Feh...keep telling yourself this ****.  Jews are just smarter than you and work harder than you.
 

Jantje_Smit » 05 Dec 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 9:56 am

The problem with your challenges is that the lefties don't do logic.... so you can't challenge them with that... see?

 

https://youtu.be/Afzsvjo1a8k

I know. But it's still fun to publicly  humiliate them.   

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 8:36 am

No......You were ridiculed.

Again.

You're a moron.

This is exactly what I predicted. No thoughts of his own. Just the same useless response. 

100% accuracy. 

Were you not able to find anything from Google to help you?

Pastafarian » 05 Dec 2022, 5:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 5:26 am

Your logic has a flaw. You believe every feminine male to be gay and every masculine female to be a lesbian. That’s not remotely true. 


 

*******. I was joking about that part. Most people would know that. 

jack » 05 Dec 2022, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 7:30 am

 Vega's argument can be accepted only if transgenders are play acting or confused. They're not.

They are confused. 

jack » 05 Dec 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 10:43 am

What you're saying is the biological fact of two sexes precludes the possibility of binary gender. Would you prefer a different word for it? That's the
problem with this argument. The spat is about language, a refusal to accept a word that accommodates someone's gender identification if it differs
from the person's biological identification.

Gender is a construct. You can't have gender without the two sexes, but you can have the two sexes without gender. 

IkeBana » 05 Dec 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 9:40 am

Thesis:  Mind your own **** business.

If trannies just kept their delusions to themselves and adults, then I would. Unfortunately, queers like you are ok with pushing this **** onto children and in our schools. That's child abuse. Child abuse is everyone's **** business. 

 

Vegas » 05 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm

I know. But it's still fun to publicly  humiliate them. 

 

So...in addition to being a stupid **** MAGA/Q-ANON polack...you're interpersonally toxic to anybody who doesn't fit your white christian model.  How nice.
 

Vegas » 05 Dec 2022, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 12:48 pm

Gender is a construct. You can't have gender without the two sexes, but you can have the two sexes without gender.

Correct, you can have two sexes without gender. You can also have them with gender.

jack » 05 Dec 2022, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 1:30 pm

Correct, you can have two sexes without gender. You can also have them with gender.

And gender must stay within the scope of male and female. Meaning, they cannot cross. 

IkeBana » 05 Dec 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 1:09 pm

So...in addition to being a stupid **** MAGA/Q-ANON polack...you're interpersonally toxic to anybody who doesn't fit your white christian model.  How nice.

No, you guys are just plain **** stupid. So...why shouldn't I humiliate you?

jack » 04 Dec 2022, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2022, 5:58 pm

word play isn’t logic.

Good luck...


 

Vegas » 05 Dec 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2022, 12:52 pm

If trannies just kept their delusions to themselves and adults, then I would. Unfortunately, queers like you are ok with pushing this **** onto children and in our schools. That's child abuse. Child abuse is everyone's **** business.

You're a **** idiot.