Liberal Forum

What's the question I'll Answer it?

FJB » 23 Jan 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 2:19 pm

Keep proving me right.

Have fun…,

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm

Show us even a shred of evidence.

If you can't, admit that you're a lying imbecile....all of youse...

Been done many times, denier perp.    
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 5:08 pm

 me a feather
 

All right.

LincolnNebraska » 23 Jan 2023, 11:21 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 11:21 pm

Been done many times, denier perp.  

Never, liar.

Not once..


 

Elon Musk’s Fortune Soars $11 Billion in Two Days While Testifying

Elon Musk’s Fortune Soars $11 Billion in Two Days While Testifying (msn.com)
 

Xavier_Onassis » 23 Jan 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 7:46 pm

The classic Peewee Herman Defense" "I know you are, but what am I?"

just another reproduction ignoring life in real time. that is what you are doing.

actions speak louder than words define maybe eternity is anywhere else but the moment here as facts of life.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 8:05 pm

Because the question was to you.

wow you really do have memory problems.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 10:18 am

Mr.7 » 23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am

You truly are an IGNORANT POS.

In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.

Freedom of Speech - Origins, First Amendment & Limits - HISTORY

without fear of government censorship

You people are so **** stupid.

 

They continue to conflate the First Amendment with the actual issue that is going to be heard in the SCOTUS in the near future.

The SCOTUS has delayed a ruling on Florida and Texas legislation that would prohibit social media platform owners from censoring disinformation on their platforms...

On Monday, the court asked the U.S. solicitor general for input on the cases, which were both filed by tech industry groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Assocation (CCIA). The groups argue that the laws violate the First Amendment rights of companies to determine what speech they host.
 Republican leaders in Texas and Florida have promoted the legislation as a way to counteract what they call unjust censorship of conservative viewpoints on social media. Major platforms have maintained that they simply enforce their terms of service.
 NetChoice and CCIA warned that if allowed to take effect, the social media laws would force platforms to keep messages even if they make false claims on very sensitive subjects. Examples include “Russia’s propaganda claiming that its invasion of Ukraine is justified, ISIS propaganda claiming that extremism is warranted, neo-Nazi or KKK screeds denying or supporting the Holocaust, and encouraging children to engage in risky or unhealthy behavior like eating disorders,” the groups wrote in an emergency application seeking to block Texas’ law from taking effect.

These Texas and Florida laws are actually infringements of the First Amendment.  The government can't interfere with the rights of a private social media business that chooses to determine what kind of speech they will allow on their platforms.

We can educate these stupid **** MAGA/Q-ANON polacks on the First Amendment all day long and they will still deny it.  Perhaps when the Trump packed SCOTUS finally rules these laws as unconstitutional they will finally STFU about it...but I kinda ****' doubt it, they are, after all, a pack of stupid **** polacks.

 

IkeBana » 24 Jan 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:24 am

They continue to conflate the First Amendment with the actual issue that is going to be heard in the SCOTUS in the near future.

The SCOTUS has delayed a ruling on Florida and Texas legislation that would prohibit social media platform owners from censoring disinformation on their platforms...

These Texas and Florida laws are actually infringements of the First Amendment.  The government can't interfere with the rights of a private social media business that chooses to determine what kind of speech they will allow on their platforms.

We can educate these stupid **** MAGA/Q-ANON polacks on the First Amendment all day long and they will still deny it.  Perhaps when the Trump packed SCOTUS finally rules these laws as unconstitutional they will finally STFU about it...but I kinda ****' doubt it, they are, after all, a pack of stupid **** polacks.

This is the benefit of a very stupid and bitter constituency. 

You can sell them pretty much anything.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 2:08 pm

But the covid19 forum is Idiotville, Uttar Pradesh..

Uttar Pradesh indeed!

230 million people - 310,783 COVID cases April, cut 97.1% in June down to just 22 cases August utilizing a treatment protocol that cost $2.65 per person treated. A modern miracle with a 35 year old safe, generic drug based protocol.

And the BacterialVagina's slaughter on innocents, by further advancing folks ignorance with her Big Pharma lies, continues.
Compare India in the chart below with Fauci's/BacterialVagina's U.S. COVID deaths.
https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Updated chart at this link doesn't look so hot. Highest U.S. COVID death toll since April of 2022, while 3rd world countries barely register: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/biwe ... a~Asia~CHN



While the BacterialVagina continues to bend over and soap up to whore herself out to Big Pharma, while aiding and abetting their slaughter of over 1.1 million Americans and millions more worldwide, sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma profits.

You are nothing more than a filthy pimple on the *** of this forum - and a co-killer in this world.
 
Image of the BacterialVagina?


 
 
 

freeman » 24 Jan 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:31 am

Uttar Pradesh indeed!

230 million people - 310,783 COVID cases April, cut 97.1% in June down to just 22 cases August utilizing a treatment protocol that cost $2.65 per person treated. A modern miracle with a 35 year old safe, generic drug based protocol.

And the BacterialVagina's slaughter on innocents, by further advancing folks ignorance with her Big Pharma lies, continues.
Compare India in the chart below with Fauci's/BacterialVagina's U.S. COVID deaths.
https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Updated chart doesn't look good: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/biwe ... a~Asia~CHN



While the BacterialVagina continues to bend over and soap up to whore herself out to Big Pharma, while aiding and abetting their slaughter of over 1.1 million Americans and millions more worldwide, sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma profits.

You are nothing more than a filthy pimple on the *** of this forum - and a co-killer in this world.

You should kill yourself. 

You're an imbecile. 
 

Mr.7 » 23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am

You truly are an IGNORANT POS.

In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.

You're so stupid you don't realize you're making our argument.  "...without fear of government censorship" right there in your post.  The First Amendment is not about censorship in a private business, it's about censorship by the government.  Social media platform owners are not violating the First Amendment because they are not the government.  The owners actually have the Constitutional right to take control over language and speech that appears in their business.  Just like the owners and management of a business has the right to fire any employee, any time they desire, for speech they do not want in their workplace.

CENSORSHIP OF SPEECH BY OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT IN THE WORKPLACE OR ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IS NOT GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP, IT IS PRIVATE BUSINESS CENSORSHIP AND NOT A VIOLATION OF ANYTHING IN THE CONSITUTION.

The IGNORANT POS is you.

And your "in general" as it applies to the First Amendment?  **** really?  How's about we apply some generalities that we approve of to the Second Amendment, eh?  And we watch your head burst into flames.    
 
 

Oh My....the first amendment is very clear. I have highlighted in RED.....those words that demoKKKrats cannot comprehend. First AmendmentThe First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.  It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices.  It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely.  It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.   
 

IkeBana » 24 Jan 2023, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:36 am

And your "in general" as it applies to the First Amendment?  **** really?  How's about we apply some generalities that we approve of to the Second Amendment, eh?  And we watch your head burst into flames.   

Go ahead....tells us all about the 2nd. 
 

Mr.7 » 24 Jan 2023, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:36 am

Oh My....the first amendment is very clear. I have highlighted in RED.....those words that demoKKKrats cannot comprehend. First AmendmentThe First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.  It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices.  It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely.  It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Correct.  It outlaws GOVERNMENT INFRINGEMENT of free expression.  Not control of speech in the workplace, or in a non-government owned private business.

You keep making this case in your posts...twice in this post.  "It forbids Congress"..."prohibiting Congress", not prohibiting Twitter, Facebook, etc.  Pay **** attention you stupid POS.
 
 

IkeBana » 24 Jan 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:40 am

Correct.  It outlaws GOVERNMENT INFRINGEMENT of free expression.  Not control of speech in the workplace, or in a non-government owned private business.

You keep making this case in your posts...twice in this post...bolded above.  Pay **** attention you stupid POS.

DUMB MOTHER-****....EXACTLY WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYIN

Kamala Harris Wants to Be Your Online Censor-in-Chief
Kamala Harris’ Free Speech Task Force
The White House Covid Censorship Machine - WSJ

 
 

How about you go suck some more *** dick, fem?

jack » 24 Jan 2023, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 4:38 am

All right.

Well. THAT was easy.

Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 10:12 am

How about you go suck some more *** dick, fem?

Well. THAT was easy.

You've got that fever again,  don't you...

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2023, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 10:21 am

You've got that fever again,  don't you...

No questions, dick sucker. 

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg