Liberal Forum

nuckinfutz » 18 Dec 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 11:03 am

Yup, and our government actually hired a lot of them!
This is why You should study history!

I'm more interested in the Marilyn Monrow part. Who killed her!!!
 

sootedupCyndi » 18 Dec 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 11:04 am

I'm more interested in the Marilyn Monrow part. Who killed her!!!

In the book; "Double Cross" Sam Giancano of the Outfit told his son, that they shoved a Seconal up her ***, after he raped her and killed her and set up Bobby Kennedy to take the blame!
This is a 'must read' book! It also delves into who killed JFK and why. Giancano hated JFK because the Mob and given so much $$ to get him elected, and Bobby was the AG and putting top mobsters behind bars. This book is so EXPLOSIVE and that's why it dissapeared from our library system!      
@sooted up Cyndi  

Let it go. Beating a dead president again. learn to change the precedence that set it up and still controls human behavior 24/7 in the atmosphere currently as it did then.

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Dec 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 11:32 am

Let it go. Beating a dead president again. learn to change the precedence that set it up and still controls human behavior 24/7 in the atmosphere currently as it did then.

The older generation was traumatized by it. Because they all knew it was SO fishy... they never got over it. My parents didnt.
i was a bit young. Only know from guests on the radio- and like i said. all the theories sound plausible.
 
 

sooted up Cyndi » 18 Dec 2022, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 11:40 am

The older generation was traumatized by it. Because they all knew it was SO fishy... they never got over it. My parents didnt.
i was a bit young. Only know from guests on the radio- and like i said. all the theories sound plausible.
 
 

I wasn't traumatized by it. It is human behavior acted out. It was like watching the second airliner crash into the second trade tower. When I saw the news about the first one I said it wasn't done yet. and boom 2nd hit and then pentagon got hit, and another was brought down by people on board attacking the hijackers.

Warren Reynolds was a witness to the murder of police officer J.D. Tippet. Reynolds followed the shooter as he left the scene. Reynolds could not identify Oswald as the shooter. Reynolds was shot in the head with a .22 by Darrell Garner. Reynolds survived and later told the Warren commission that the killer of Tippet was Oswald. Reynolds said that his children were threatened. Darrell Garner was alibied by a Betty Macdonald who had been a stripper at Jack Ruby’s club. Macdonald was arrested one week later and hung herself in her cell. Garner died in 1970 from a heroin OD. The time line of both Tippet and Oswald is odd because it has been said that Oswald could not have traveled the distance from the murder of Tippet to the theater he was arrested at in the time allowed. All of the bullets found in Tippet did not match up.
 

roadkill » 17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am

Jackie thought LBJ may have been behind JFK's assassination.

well probably not...he was a puppet. But he was certainly willing to play ball with the israel lobby after the assassination

FOS » 18 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm

well probably not...he was a puppet. But he was certainly willing to play ball with the israel lobby after the assassination

As much as JFK cheated on Jackie, why not think she had him eliminated. Look whom she ended up with after that? Not in the Kennedy family.

hey Cyndi, do you remember when Bill Clinton ran in 1992 he made a big deal about JFK being his mentor and how after meeting JFK when he was13 or 15 he wanted to grow up just like him as a powerful womanizer president of the USA..

FOS » 18 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm

well probably not...he was a puppet. But he was certainly willing to play ball with the israel lobby after the assassination

LBJ got bumped aside by RFK...he didn't like that.  

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm

As much as JFK cheated on Jackie, why not think she had him eliminated. Look whom she ended up with after that? Not in the Kennedy family.

hey Cyndi, do you remember when Bill Clinton ran in 1992 he made a big deal about JFK being his mentor and how after meeting JFK when he was13 or 15 he wanted to grow up just like him as a powerful womanizer president of the USA..

He out did Kennedy- Didnt he? Oh yea.. the clinton years were total fun and smut...  
 

roadkill » 18 Dec 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:32 pm

LBJ got bumped aside by RFK...he didn't like that.  

Not what I remembered. LBJ might have bumped off RFK more than JFK so Hubert Humphrey got the change.

sooted up Cyndi » 18 Dec 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:40 pm

He out did Kennedy- Didnt he? Oh yea.. the clinton years were total fun and smut... :lol:  
 

corruption uncorrected gets worse each next generation gap corrupted by societal evolution promising life doesn't exist self contained to only evolving forward now.

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm

As much as JFK cheated on Jackie, why not think she had him eliminated. Look whom she ended up with after that? Not in the Kennedy family.

hey Cyndi, do you remember when Bill Clinton ran in 1992 he made a big deal about JFK being his mentor and how after meeting JFK when he was13 or 15 he wanted to grow up just like him as a powerful womanizer president of the USA..

women who marry powerful men expect them to cheat lol. Killing them would not help out their situation. And they certainly would not be willing to sit next to them while it happens lol...change of collateral damage. Also...it isnt like the wife of the president would have the various connections or leverage necessary to effect such a conspiracy

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Dec 2022, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:42 pm

corruption uncorrected gets worse each next generation gap corrupted by societal evolution promising life doesn't exist self contained to only evolving forward now.

oh yea it is!! you're right omh.

FOS » 18 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm

women who marry powerful men expect them to cheat lol. Killing them would not help out their situation. And they certainly would not be willing to sit next to them while it happens lol...change of collateral damage. Also...it isnt like the wife of the president would have the various connections or leverage necessary to effect such a conspiracy

You are really lacking understanding physical absolutes protecting reasonable doubts used historically as nation building using planned obsolescence and plausible deniability.

johndnorth » 16 Dec 2022, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2022, 1:52 pm

I was around then. I saw live on TV the killing of Oswald. Dorothy Killgallin interviewed Ruby and then died. Killgallin knew what happened. There were three things that always bothered me about the assassination of JFK. The movements and the times of the cop Tippet were never satisfactory to me. A motorcycle cops intercom was on and recording. The intercom picked up additional shots. To me the kill shot was impossible with the rifle he used, the angle and the speed needed to work the bolt. I believe there was an additional shooter and Oswald was a patsy as he claimed. If there was a plot to kill JFK the only people capable of pulling it off was the CIA, FBI or a combination of the two.

Speaking of Dorothy Killgallin, have you seen this? This man, IMO, pretty much wraps up everything very clearly. He has the only known Ruby court transcripts, shows them to the audience, and demonstrates how the assassination was clearly orchestrated by much more than the Oswald theory.  It's a very long and comprehensive speech, but so compelling, I listened to the entire thing.

Mysterious Death of Reporter Dorothy Kilgallen & the JFK Assassination - YouTube

Selaphobia » 17 Dec 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2022, 8:11 pm

You want to hear a really good one? Remember when they told you they found Nuclear Codes and information on Saudi Arabia from the Raid on Trump? Come on, you remember..

Well... Here is a really big WHOPPER... Hang on to tight... The WAPO announced it was not true.... All fabricated... Let me tell you about the WAPO.. WAPO and NYT got the Pulitzer prize for the "Russian Collusion" and guess what? It was all bunk... yep, one big fabricated LIE. Now you would think the WAPO and NYT would return the Pulitzer Prize, right?

Nope. They keeping it!

If you do not believe what I am telling you, do your research... All of the above is 100% true and you can verify it. No need to give me negative $$..
Sometimes you have to read and hear things that you don't like, but that is life, so they say.

Yeah, like all the other obvious lies & rumors you delight in spreading, Pud.

Selaphobia » 15 Dec 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2022, 5:43 pm

12/15/2022

They are hiding something. What is it? 
More records related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination were released Thursday by the National Archives.

The agency released 13,173, documents containing new information, stating now over 97% of records in the collection are publicly available. Originally, the National Archives said 12,879 documents were being released but later updated the total due to "last minute additions.

"President Joe Biden authorized the release of the documents, but will continue to block some materials from public view until June 30, 2023, claiming releasing them now would result in "identifiable harm."

"I agree that continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is warranted to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure," Biden said in a memorandum released Thursday afternoon.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trove-jfk-*** ... 00743.html

Alphabet Agencies lie....

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/S2mhTty5dsM
 
 

Selaphobia » 15 Dec 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2022, 5:43 pm

12/15/2022

They are hiding something. What is it? 
More records related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination were released Thursday by the National Archives.

The agency released 13,173, documents containing new information, stating now over 97% of records in the collection are publicly available. Originally, the National Archives said 12,879 documents were being released but later updated the total due to "last minute additions.

"President Joe Biden authorized the release of the documents, but will continue to block some materials from public view until June 30, 2023, claiming releasing them now would result in "identifiable harm."

"I agree that continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is warranted to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure," Biden said in a memorandum released Thursday afternoon.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trove-jfk-*** ... 00743.html

probably the truth about the magic bullet will never be released. even the governor of texas and his wife said there were 2 shooters.