Howmany **** **** in uniform will pass their hiv on to other **** **** in uniform? How many men in dresses will be accepd into positions of leadership in our armed forces, tranny supporter?Skans » 21 Dec 2022, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing at least a million. Mostly men. There's going to be a lot of hot, horny Russian women looking for American Husbands in 2023. Just tell them to drop off their bastard children at Putin's Place before coming over here.
Looking for tips on how to pass, pedo?IkeBana » 22 Dec 2022, 4:29 am » wrote: ↑ What doesn't seem *** to you? Or, what doesn’t seem jewey to you either?
How did the latest rim job taste, eh rent boi?
Flirt away, fruity - you're not getting on this dick.
Yeh...you have a dick.Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2022, 4:55 am » wrote: ↑ Flirt away, fruity - you're not getting on this dick.
Yeah, he's doing so well on his own.
johndnorth » 21 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Vlad mobilized 250,000+. He used a form of ethnic cleansing by conscripting from the hinterlands which contain different ethnic groups. He did not mobilize from Moscow or St. Petersburg. These people were given 5 DAYS OF TRAINING, summer uniforms, WW2 helmets, no body armor (or armor that is nowhere near NATO standard), and small arms that could be 50 years old. These men were sent immediately to the line near Bakhmut to plug holes in the line. Wagner group (paid mercenaries) were placed behind the conscripted troops. Mobiks ( mobilized troops) were decimated but the line held. Some villages in the Russian hinterland lost most of the men in the village. Vlad now is planning a new mobilization for Jan. Feb. of 300,00 men. If Russia is going to use these men in the same manner there could be a million lost There is a resistance in Russia. Lots of fires at oil storage depots and other valuable military facilities. Russian IT specialists, and other professionals have already left Russia and a new mobilization will only make the economic system in Russia worse. As senile Joe said in the beginning It depends on how much land Putin wants.
anyone paying attention to this whole Ukraine thing? Am I the only one noticing the pendulum swing by the MSM and other mediums governing people's behavior globally?Monderegal » 21 Dec 2022, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin has to be insane to try to invade Ukraine again. They say it might be in the spring or Belarus might invade with its own army. That or a long term WWI stalemate in the trenches.
After these many years of seeing sexually confused people, both in person and these "public" places,Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2022, 4:24 am » wrote: ↑ It all seems it must be defended by skannie the trannie.
I want ten thousand Russian acres. I figure it will be going cheap when all the Russian men are killed off. They can call me Czar Skans.Cannonpointer » 21 Dec 2022, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you care, tranny worshiper? Looking for Yevgeny yang? A little Boris boonga? Some Akexai aneconda?
Skans » 21 Dec 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Calculated guess. And, yes, you will be getting a big "I TOLD YOU SO" when Rufalamo straps you to your bed and injects you with his special brand of Sleepeeeeezzzz.

This is the best piece you have ever written! KUDOS!DeezerShoove » 22 Dec 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ After these many years of seeing sexually confused people, both in person and these "public" places,
I have to believe a huge fraction are not necessarily bad people. They have just let their confusion get
the better of them.
Going along just to get along seems to be the American Way these days.
That's the kind of thing that stresses people out on a job they can't afford to lose.
Deep down they don't really like what's going on, but are lacking any confidence they can change it.
I've told people in the past to go **** themselves (nicely, of course, and quite literally sometimes).
Standing up is its own reward. So, maybe these people aren't evil per se, but just kinda weak.
This excerpt captures The Jab, Ukraine, Biden's presidency, to name a few irrationalities of the day.
. . .
Groupthink ---
John Leake
At a recent event in Malibu, California, hosted by the Children’s Health Defense, I fell into a fascinating conversation with a fellow investigative author about what is going on in our increasingly bewildering world, and the difficulty of ascertaining anything with certainty. One of the phenomena we discussed was the way in which humans often divide into groups that perceive the same object in diametrically opposing ways. In our current controversy, one group sees the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines as a godsend; the other group sees them as a menace. The opposing groups argue and hurl purported facts and figures at each other, but rarely does anyone in either group change his mind. Once a belief is adopted, it can be surprisingly persistent, even in the face of massive empirical evidence to the contrary.
Pondering this phenomenon reminded me of an essay that was published in 2017 in the New Yorker. I reread it this (Sunday) evening before I went to bed. Just as I recalled, the essay contains many interesting and thought-provoking passages. I’d completely forgotten the exceptionally tendentious paragraph on vaccine hesitancy. While most of the article is written in a neutral, non-assertive tone, it unequivocally characterizes those who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines as fundamentally irrational. That the quoted expert’s certainty may itself be an irrational article of faith isn’t countenanced.
The musing I found most interesting is that most humans do not apply reason to the endeavor of independent inquiry, but to figuring out how to integrate with a group, get along with its members, and benefit from them. The loner must fend for himself. It’s extremely difficult to acquire or achieve anything all by oneself. The Paleolithic “freethinker” who challenged his tribe’s chieftains and high priests would likely find himself ostracized, exposed, vulnerable, and hungry. Thus, Groupthink may be conceptualized as an archaic survival mechanism that has persisted into the modern world. If you leave your group, your options are limited to joining the opposing group or being alone. For most of us, neither option is appealing.
As Kipling famously put it: The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is hard business. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
Might be flattering you want someone for a double if you weren't a dumbbell.Selaphobia » 22 Dec 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Sweet Avatar!
@murdock you need an avatar like this one.
Skans » 22 Dec 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I want ten thousand Russian acres. I figure it will be going cheap when all the Russian men are killed off. They can call me Czar Skans.
Selaphobia » 22 Dec 2022, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't help it. I altered Jack's posts and his avatar because I'm such a loser.
it all depends on, how much usa tax dollars will be used for zelensky's mansion in florida + new bank account congress set up for rat zelensky. vs. how much of your tax dollars will be used to murder russian freedom fighters. i think congress should set aside a few dollars to bury those usa citizens who starved to death.Skans » 21 Dec 2022, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing at least a million. Mostly men. There's going to be a lot of hot, horny Russian women looking for American Husbands in 2023. Just tell them to drop off their bastard children at Putin's Place before coming over here.
Maybe your mom could view it while she sucks my dick?jack » 22 Dec 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Might be flattering you want someone for a double if you weren't a dumbbell.