Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Trillion$ LOOTED by (((OUR FRIENDS))) over past 5 CENTURIE$
Trillion$ LOOTED by (((OUR FRIENDS))) over past 5 CENTURIE$
By LowIQTrash
24 Dec 2022 11:56 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Dec 2023 5:03 pm
Ah, **** - it's piss piss with more of the same.peepee » 26 Dec 2022, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑
...again, you blathering authoriTARDian monetary ignoramus,
Ho hum.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Dec 2023 5:04 pm
And bro, we were the EXCEPTION. Everybody else had it worse!Justthetruth » 06 Jan 2023, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ But the corporate class keeps wages low so you have to borrow money to survive.
Its how this country was built.
Get the rubes to do the work while you rake in the money.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Dec 2023 5:10 pm
Are you talking about billionaires getting huge tax cuts when they don't pay any taxes to begin with?LowIQTrash » 25 Dec 2022, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑ Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Please enjoy your Xmas/holidays.
Anyway, I ran across this interesting article a week or so ago.
I will warn you it is very long, as is typical of Unz.com articles as the majority of the readership is 120+ and a significant minority are 135+ (some are likely in the 145-155 camp) so no (((Bennie Shapiro)))/Kyle Kulinski/Tomi Lahren/(((Rubin Report)))/Trevor Noah/[insert your favorite YT commentator] levels of midwittery.
Link posted below for those of you willing to bravely scour the entire article. I will be posting snippets that I deem critical.
The Richest Man in the World, by Larry Romanoff - The Unz Review
14 Dec 2023 1:52 am
Billionaires are like the leftover cheese in pizza boxes next to these (((dynasties))).Bidencrimefamily » 13 Dec 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you talking about billionaires getting huge tax cuts when they don't pay any taxes to begin with?
14 Dec 2023 1:57 am
Unfortunately for you - as much as you admire FDR - it turns out FDR was also a part of the JOO-ish criminal heist when it came to his executive order to relieve Americans of their gold and silver...Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Ah, **** - it's piss piss with more of the same.
Ho hum.
...(11) The Great Gold Robbery – Part I – The US FED
In the early years after the creation of the Rothschild-owned FED, the US was still on a gold standard for its currency; new money could be issued by the FED only if it had at least 40% of that amount in gold. But, as the Jewish bankers have always done in every country, they issued paper currency far beyond the permitted limits, which was the prime cause of the 1929 Great Depression. By 1933, the FED had only about 6,000 metric tons of gold in its vaults, and was about 50,000 tonnes short for the paper currency it had issued. The public were aware generally of what was happening and, with concerns of US paper money becoming worthless, were spending the paper and hoarding the gold coins and bars, while small banks and companies were hoarding gold bullion. There was no way out of this trap. The FED needed a huge infusion of gold to prevent a collapse of the currency, but its owners had no intention of investing their own money to prevent the financial collapse of America. Their solution was to convince Roosevelt and Congress that the real problem was citizens preventing the economy from naturally prospering, by holding gold. On their advice, Roosevelt passed the famous 1602 provision which confiscated all the privately-held gold (in all forms) in the US, all citizens forced to turn over their gold to the FED, under penalty of a $10,000 fine plus a 10-year prison sentence. Note that the gold was not surrendered to the US Treasury Department, but to the privately-owned FED.
My estimate for the bullion was around 6,000 or 7,000 tonnes as a minimum, for a total of about 10,000 tonnes, but Seagrave quotes credible sources claiming the FED purchased 18,000 tonnes so I will use that figure.
However, this was nowhere near sufficient to cover the 50,000-tonne shortfall, so the Jewish bankers – led by the Jew Morgenthau, who was then Secretary of the Treasury – devalued the US dollar by about 70% immediately after the gold had been confiscated, thus raising the gold price from $20 to $35, and substantially reducing the FED’s shortfall. But this was with the tragic result that Americans were not only cheated by the loss of their only real cash asset, but of the 70% loss in value. There were lawsuits of course, with the courts essentially determining that the government’s action was illegal and unconstitutional, but that citizens had no recourse.
In summary, to bail out the FED, Rothschild (or his colleagues) convinced Roosevelt to pass a law permitting Rothschild to confiscate all the privately-held gold in America and to devalue by 70% the paper given to Americans in return for that gold. Those 18,000 metric tonnes of gold had a value then of about $20 billion*, taken from the people in the middle of the worst recession in living memory, surely one of the cruelest and most inhumane acts possible at the time. A gold run on the Federal Reserve bank was imminent, and this entire act was simply to prevent the financial collapse of the FED – at the cost of further impoverishing the population and extending the Great Depression by years.[30]
* 32,150 oz. per metric tonne @ $35/oz. (roughly $1 million per tonne) times 18,000 metric tonnes. Today, that gold is worth around $1,700 per oz., or about $50 million per tonne, times 18,000 tonnes = approximately $1 trillion.
14 Dec 2023 8:56 am
That is one of many great crimes FDR committed. He was a bad actor.LowIQTrash » 14 Dec 2023, 2:57 am » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately for you - as much as you admire FDR - it turns out FDR was also a part of the JOO-ish criminal heist when it came to his executive order to relieve Americans of their gold and silver...
...
He just happened to be the best president of the 20th century by a country mile, and his policies were sine qua non of the unprecedented middle class in murka.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Dec 2023 9:17 am
WTF? It's CHRISTMAS "Christ's Mas(s)". Not Xmas! Now, what were you saying about your friends, the atheists?LowIQTrash » 25 Dec 2022, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑ Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Please enjoy your Xmas/holidays.
14 Dec 2023 9:21 am
Cannonpointer » 14 Dec 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ That is one of many great crimes FDR committed. He was a bad actor.
He just happened to be the best president of the 20th century by a country mile, and his policies were sine qua non of the unprecedented middle class in murka.
14 Dec 2023 9:25 am
CONTEXT, son.
The man was out of cigarettes.
FDR saved capitalism. From its own excesses. He bridled it. Retard ronnie cut the ropes - and the middle class has been shrinking ever since.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Dec 2023 10:38 am
He also inspired the 22nd amendment, finally ratified 6 years after his death.Cannonpointer » 14 Dec 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ CONTEXT, son.
The man was out of cigarettes.
FDR saved capitalism. From its own excesses. He bridled it. Retard ronnie cut the ropes - and the middle class has been shrinking ever since.
15 Dec 2023 2:30 pm
Interesting essay.LowIQTrash » 25 Dec 2022, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑ Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Please enjoy your Xmas/holidays.
Anyway, I ran across this interesting article a week or so ago.
I will warn you it is very long, as is typical of Unz.com articles as the majority of the readership is 120+ and a significant minority are 135+ (some are likely in the 145-155 camp) so no (((Bennie Shapiro)))/Kyle Kulinski/Tomi Lahren/(((Rubin Report)))/Trevor Noah/[insert your favorite YT commentator] levels of midwittery.
Link posted below for those of you willing to bravely scour the entire article. I will be posting snippets that I deem critical.
The Richest Man in the World, by Larry Romanoff - The Unz Review
After reading it, I was unsure what to make of the world. Seriously.
If "they" basically are calling the shots at nearly every turn, what's the use of grousing?
We're just so many cattle inside a fence. Might as well resign ourselves to our inevitable fate.
Trying to fight back is fruitless, right? A person would be battling a centuries-old behemoth.
Besides that, battling whom? Fellow cattle? Collaborators?
What opponent stands before us available to strike down? Not the people in charge; that's for sure.
Thanks for posting it. I'm no longer an earthling. I'm a Jewlette.
edit add:
Post of the Day nomination was a bit late.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
15 Dec 2023 3:26 pm
I took the author’s numbers with a grain of salt. You are not getting 5% CAGR if you already owned billions in 1820. More like 2-3%. There is also the issue of inheritees squandering away the money (“It takes 10 generations to build up wealth and only one to destroy it”) which inevitably happens somewhere along the dark line of descendants.DeezerShoove » 15 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Interesting essay.
After reading it, I was unsure what to make of the world. Seriously.
If "they" basically are calling the shots at nearly every turn, what's the use of grousing?
We're just so many cattle inside a fence. Might as well resign ourselves to our inevitable fate.
Trying to fight back is fruitless, right? A person would be battling a centuries-old behemoth.
Besides that, battling whom? Fellow cattle? Collaborators?
What opponent stands before us available to strike down? Not the people in charge; that's for sure.
Thanks for posting it. I'm no longer an earthling. I'm a Jewlette.
edit add:
Post of the Day nomination was a bit late.
I would further assume a lot of the “wealth” is in highly illiquid assets like paintings, gold bullion stashed underground in hidden bunkers, patents, copyright, “goodwill” (Hollywood), non-profits/NGOs, control over legacy media, and highly inflated assets like stocks and housing in stock market/housing bubbles so I’m not particularly impressed.
15 Dec 2023 6:33 pm
LowIQTrash » 15 Dec 2023, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I took the author’s numbers with a grain of salt. You are not getting 5% CAGR if you already owned billions in 1820. More like 2-3%. There is also the issue of inheritees squandering away the money (“It takes 10 generations to build up wealth and only one to destroy it”) which inevitably happens somewhere along the dark line of descendants.
I would further assume a lot of the “wealth” is in highly illiquid assets like paintings, gold bullion stashed underground in hidden bunkers, patents, copyright, “goodwill” (Hollywood), non-profits/NGOs, control over legacy media, and highly inflated assets like stocks and housing in stock market/housing bubbles so I’m not particularly impressed.
Seems you understood my slightly cynical "might as well kill my useless self" take-away...
Hey, I'm willing to hate elitist scum as much as the next guy. They don't have to even be Jewish.
As I have noted here in NHB, I'm not as willing to accept the "poor me" **** about Jewish plight.
I was educated by posters here about seeking other sources and have done so.
Already a bit skeptic about the World Wars and Holocaust, I find the taboos surrounding Jews dubious.
I don't credit/blame this site for anything but getting me off my lazy *** to investigate a bit more.
Finding that Hitler wasn't AS bad and Jews weren't AS innocent as legends suggest didn't surprise me.
What's actually more disconcerting is that there are actual laws on the books forcing the legends.
As I had said here the Jews have used the wars to perfection in creating a narrative.
Narratives are almost always filled with omissions at best, outright lies at worst.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA 
Tell Larry that the plural is "wunderkinder"...LowIQTrash » 25 Dec 2022, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑ Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Please enjoy your Xmas/holidays.
Anyway, I ran across this interesting article a week or so ago.
I will warn you it is very long, as is typical of Unz.com articles as the majority of the readership is 120+ and a significant minority are 135+ (some are likely in the 145-155 camp) so no (((Bennie Shapiro)))/Kyle Kulinski/Tomi Lahren/(((Rubin Report)))/Trevor Noah/[insert your favorite YT commentator] levels of midwittery.
Link posted below for those of you willing to bravely scour the entire article. I will be posting snippets that I deem critical.
The Richest Man in the World, by Larry Romanoff - The Unz Review
DeezerShoove » 15 Dec 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Seems you understood my slightly cynical "might as well kill my useless self" take-away...
Hey, I'm willing to hate elitist scum as much as the next guy. They don't have to even be Jewish.
As I have noted here in NHB, I'm not as willing to accept the "poor me" **** about Jewish plight.
I was educated by posters here about seeking other sources and have done so.
Already a bit skeptic about the World Wars and Holocaust, I find the taboos surrounding Jews dubious.
I don't credit/blame this site for anything but getting me off my lazy *** to investigate a bit more.
Finding that Hitler wasn't AS bad and Jews weren't AS innocent as legends suggest didn't surprise me.
What's actually more disconcerting is that there are actual laws on the books forcing the legends.
As I had said here the Jews have used the wars to perfection in creating a narrative.
Narratives are almost always filled with omissions at best, outright lies at worst.
Already a bit skeptic about the World Wars and Holocaust,
The Reeducation of Coozie...
DeezerShoove » 15 Dec 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Seems you understood my slightly cynical "might as well kill my useless self" take-away...
Hey, I'm willing to hate elitist scum as much as the next guy. They don't have to even be Jewish.
As I have noted here in NHB, I'm not as willing to accept the "poor me" **** about Jewish plight.
I was educated by posters here about seeking other sources and have done so.
Already a bit skeptic about the World Wars and Holocaust, I find the taboos surrounding Jews dubious.
I don't credit/blame this site for anything but getting me off my lazy *** to investigate a bit more.
Finding that Hitler wasn't AS bad and Jews weren't AS innocent as legends suggest didn't surprise me.
What's actually more disconcerting is that there are actual laws on the books forcing the legends.
As I had said here the Jews have used the wars to perfection in creating a narrative.
Narratives are almost always filled with omissions at best, outright lies at worst.
Holy ****!Finding that Hitler wasn't AS bad and Jews weren't AS innocent as legends suggest didn't surprise me.
So ya got nothing ... again.
Trundle off and find some article you can copy. Your opinion is out there somewhere.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Oh, it's obvious you haven't learned anything here.
I don't suffer the ego problems plaguing your life.
Admitting I'm teachable (from many POV's) is not my problem.
It's apparently yours, though.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Who is online
In total there are 1379 users online :: 30 registered, 19 bots, and 1330 guests
Registered users: *Vegas, JohnEdgarSlowHorses, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, sooted up Cyndi, maineman, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, Jantje_Smit, ConservativeWave, NEILCAR, GHETTO BLASTER, *Beekeeper, Majik, jerra b, EDC4ALL!, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Sumela, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, BooRadley, nefarious101, 31st Arrival, *Huey, Fuelman
Bots: okhttp, DuckDuckGo, Not, LCC, MicroMessenger, Applebot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, GrapeshotCrawler, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, app.hypefactors.com, proximic, linkfluence.com, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot