FOS » 27 Dec 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ i dont know how this relates to my post...but i must say that electing a representative is a way of selling your sovereignty.
The modern wage slave is literally in a worse material position than the poor slaves of yore were. By definition they were given a 'living wage'...because living was part of the deal. But anyway I don't see how your post is relevantBob » 27 Dec 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Delusions of non voluntary classing and grouping grandeur (we are God, yer not) (you are fetus cattle animals, we are humans).
In 1783 the owner of the people inhabiting what was to become the fully recognized country, the United States of America were released from subject status, >>>>>>>chattel property, of former owner King George<<<<<<. The 1783 Treaty of Peace recognized the People as Sovereigns in our own right on the land. The Kings former governments as the Kings property transferred to the Peoples ownership as did the Kings ownership over the land.
The creators are always the owners and maintain full right, title and interest, complete ownership, in what they create until the property is sold, bargained, or gifted away. The American People never sold, bargained nor gifted away our personal individual Sovereignty bestowed upon us by our former owner King George. No American has done do since 1783.
Stuff is getting too serfy.FOS » 28 Dec 2022, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The modern wage slave is literally in a worse material position than the poor slaves of yore were. By definition they were given a 'living wage'...because living was part of the deal. But anyway I don't see how your post is relevant
IkeBana » 27 Dec 2022, 3:29 am » wrote: ↑ I sure hope it shows. The human race are locusts. You're obviously proud of what we have done to this planet.
.
That’s going to cause conservative retards’ heads to spin.FOS » 28 Dec 2022, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The modern wage slave is literally in a worse material position than the poor slaves of yore were. By definition they were given a 'living wage'...because living was part of the deal. But anyway I don't see how your post is relevant
LOL - I thought this was going to be how he is really a ***, even though he claims to be a heterosexual.FOS » 26 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ VERY MUCH a case study...because you see this crap all the time. In fact there is a banned Twitter account called 'the noticer' who would retweet every day Jewish people engaging in this obvious hypocrisy (not even giving commentary...just reposting 2 things from a Jewish account showing this hypocrisy)
but I just discovered such a funny example of it with simple links that I have to share it...and I have to add this sort of thing is typical.
David schwimmer...you know him right? Nice quirky fun jew...a guy you would love to be friends with. Well he has some perfectly valid thoughts about race...let's check them out:
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radi ... ke-a-siren
Note this quote: David Schwimmer reveals he has ‘never felt white, ever’
NEVER! Wow...that's quite a strong qualifier. Not even once has he ever felt white. Okay dave...cool. noted.
Now check this out: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/202 ... white-male
same publication even. Wow. What is he saying now?
"I’m very aware of my privilege as a heterosexual white male"..
Well thats a funny thing to be aware of for a guy who has never felt white ever...isn't it? Imagine the aame brain saying both of these things at different times lol...
apparently jews are only white when they want to make a heartfelt confession about how **** white people are. But if you ever try to hold them accountable for alleged evil of whites, suddenly they aren't white.
funny how convenient this is for them...isn't it?