Liberal Forum

Hello everyone. Hope you enjoyed your Xmas!   


Here is a short list of popular political commentators + their political leanings to "prove" (substantiate) the idea that...well, (((YouTube))) wants you to be retarded/ignorant...by directing you into channels of misinformation/disinformation/mediocre arguments/shallow sophistry.

And maybe you ARE already retarded/ignorant, so nothing is gained or lost by you watching these channels...(heh) but still, I'd like to throw down the gauntlet and see if any of you can prove me wrong.



Part 1 of ?


1. Tim Pool - claims he is a "classical liberal" (I doubt he - or for that matter, most "classical liberals" - even knows what the term means, just like how most people can't define "capitalism," "socialism," "communism," "fascism," whateverism because...people are retarded lol)

Verdict: 100% for midwits / TP isn't particularly intelligent, even if he does make decent arguments every now and then; nothing out of the ordinary

Bonus: Ask a self-proclaimed "classical liberal" what economists like Smith/Ricardo/George (Georgian Economics) actually believed (snicker) and don't settle for vague responses...and get ready for some laughter. Don't let them cheat via search engines/Wikipedia either.



2. Joe Rogan - JR seems to oscillate from "Bernie Bro" style succdem (social democrat) to libertar(D)ianism...then back to succdemism whenever he feels like it. Then back to liberTARDianism. Coz reasons.

If I had to describe JR...he's an umbrella "anti-establishment" type...which is fine but shallow. Everybody who isn't a complete retard knows "the Establishment" is corrupt, so there's no point in rehashing this.

Verdict: 80-85% midwittery, not good for in-depth analysis. Still better than most political channels on YT (though that's a pretty low bar). Occasionally some interesting content but usually outside politics. 

Bonus: JR had Tulsi Gabbard on his show several times, but never questioned Tulsi Gabbard's affiliation with the WEF "Young Leaders"...after all Tulsi Gabbard frequently marketed herself as "anti-establishment" but hailed from a highly suspect (((globalist))) organization.

 

Part 2 of ?

Kyle Kulinski - self-proclaimed succdem/Bernie Bro.

KK is like...1 step above people who worship Democrats (like most of the retarded liberals on LF.net or just any political forum/Facebook/Twitter in general) which is pretty bad lol.

Here's the rundown on these morons:

There are many people...mostly liberal Democrats but I guess some Independents/Republicans too...who "think" the Democrats WANT to give you universal HC + much higher MW + no more MIC wars + campaign finance reform...but the MEANIE EVIL REPUBLICANS block them every time!  And if only you kept voting (D) every election...things would change!!!111   

XD

KK's argumentative skills are severely deficient. For instance, one time I watched a short clip of him showing a scene of a "stupid Trumpie conspiracy theorist" asking why everybody needs to "socially distance" 6 feet. Why not 7 feet, 9 feet, 10 feet, etc.?

(IQ Pop Quiz: if you can figure out why it's "6 feet of social distancing" that should put you at 123 IQ minimum LOL)

Anyway, KK's counter-argument: "Well, this guy never tells us why it ISN'T 6 ft."

He responded to an inquiry ("Where's the evidence behind 6 ft SD?") by attempting to shift the burden of proof onto the opponent. This is a basic blunder/error (doesn't understand burden of proof) - and based on KK's history he usually doesn't try to weasel his way out of arguments by dishonesty like (((Tiny Hats))) would.

KK is honest but dumb lol.

Anyway, I'm not surprised he debates against the likes of cretins like Charlie Kirk at Politicon. (Kyle Kulinski Vs Charlie Kirk | Politicon 2019 - YouTube) LOL

Tucker Carlson - oh boy, where to start...(TC's vids garner a relatively massive # of views compared to his cohorts on Fox News' YT channel so I will include him here on this list even though YT isn't his primary outlet)

Former neocon who had his nose up DUBYA'S *** (like most of you **** idiot Trumptards), then converted to liberTARDianism (Glenn Beck did the same thing...he started calling himself a "libertarian" to rebrand himself LMFAO, what's with these lame marketing tactics)...now he's like...some paleocon/faux nationalist who rants about "our evil/corrupt ruling class" every segment

Fun fact/Aside: TC rebranded himself as a paleocon/quasi-nationalist after he realized the proles hate LIBERTARDIANISM that advocates flooding our country with undesirable 3rd worlders/don't want to get raped by monopolies and major corps

If you listen to a few of his monologues, he has this seductive bent to all his Fox News segments, where he kind of/sort of calls out "people on both sides" and LURES the ignorant into thinking: "Tucker is a true journalist! He's the only one in the MSM telling us DA TROOF!!!11"   

TC is Prince Charming to an army of FN watching princesses. Other Fox anchors like Hannity/Ingraham don't even come close to TC in terms of aggregate ratings/YT video views

TC is a honeypot/spider web for malcontent Trumptards/Republicans who are growing increasingly bitter/resentful at "the political establishment." His goal is to channel that anger back into voting Republican so you can keep serving your corporate masters/oligarchs like a good debt slave/wage slave/tax donkey.

Every time election season swings around, he subtly manipulates the army of princesses to get **** again...by the likes of McConnell, Graham, "RINOs", etc. doing the bidding of (((International Financiers/Money Changers)))

TC wins my award for "master manipulator" 

 
 

Every human reality requires typecast people ignore the same thing differently and compromise on everything socially governing life forward to agree to disagree until extinction event occurs when great great grandchildren stop changing population forward one at a time here already now..

LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am

Hello everyone. Hope you enjoyed your Xmas!   

Here is a short list of popular political commentators + their political leanings to "prove" (substantiate) the idea that...well, (((YouTube))) wants you to be retarded/ignorant...by directing you into channels of misinformation/disinformation/mediocre arguments/shallow sophistry.

And maybe you ARE already retarded/ignorant, so nothing is gained or lost by you watching these channels...(heh) but still, I'd like to throw down the gauntlet and see if any of you can prove me wrong.

Part 1 of ?

1. Tim Pool - claims he is a "classical liberal" (I doubt he - or for that matter, most "classical liberals" - even knows what the term means, just like how most people can't define "capitalism," "socialism," "communism," "fascism," whateverism because...people are retarded lol)

Verdict: 100% for midwits / TP isn't particularly intelligent, even if he does make decent arguments every now and then; nothing out of the ordinary

Bonus: Ask a self-proclaimed "classical liberal" what economists like Smith/Ricardo/George (Georgian Economics) actually believed (snicker) and don't settle for vague responses...and get ready for some laughter. Don't let them cheat via search engines/Wikipedia either.

2. Joe Rogan - JR seems to oscillate from "Bernie Bro" style succdem (social democrat) to libertar(D)ianism...then back to succdemism whenever he feels like it. Then back to liberTARDianism. Coz reasons.

If I had to describe JR...he's an umbrella "anti-establishment" type...which is fine but shallow. Everybody who isn't a complete retard knows "the Establishment" is corrupt, so there's no point in rehashing this.

Verdict: 80-85% midwittery, not good for in-depth analysis. Still better than most political channels on YT (though that's a pretty low bar). Occasionally some interesting content but usually outside politics. 

Bonus: JR had Tulsi Gabbard on his show several times, but never questioned Tulsi Gabbard's affiliation with the WEF "Young Leaders"...after all Tulsi Gabbard frequently marketed herself as "anti-establishment" but hailed from a highly suspect (((globalist))) organization.

Coz reasons.

Putting your finger to the wind?

That's just cheese....

 

Interesting writing style.

LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am

Hello everyone. Hope you enjoyed your Xmas!   

Here is a short list of popular political commentators + their political leanings to "prove" (substantiate) the idea that...well, (((YouTube))) wants you to be retarded/ignorant...by directing you into channels of misinformation/disinformation/mediocre arguments/shallow sophistry.

And maybe you ARE already retarded/ignorant, so nothing is gained or lost by you watching these channels...(heh) but still, I'd like to throw down the gauntlet and see if any of you can prove me wrong.

Part 1 of ?

1. Tim Pool - claims he is a "classical liberal" (I doubt he - or for that matter, most "classical liberals" - even knows what the term means, just like how most people can't define "capitalism," "socialism," "communism," "fascism," whateverism because...people are retarded lol)

Verdict: 100% for midwits / TP isn't particularly intelligent, even if he does make decent arguments every now and then; nothing out of the ordinary

Bonus: Ask a self-proclaimed "classical liberal" what economists like Smith/Ricardo/George (Georgian Economics) actually believed (snicker) and don't settle for vague responses...and get ready for some laughter. Don't let them cheat via search engines/Wikipedia either.

2. Joe Rogan - JR seems to oscillate from "Bernie Bro" style succdem (social democrat) to libertar(D)ianism...then back to succdemism whenever he feels like it. Then back to liberTARDianism. Coz reasons.

If I had to describe JR...he's an umbrella "anti-establishment" type...which is fine but shallow. Everybody who isn't a complete retard knows "the Establishment" is corrupt, so there's no point in rehashing this.

Verdict: 80-85% midwittery, not good for in-depth analysis. Still better than most political channels on YT (though that's a pretty low bar). Occasionally some interesting content but usually outside politics. 

Bonus: JR had Tulsi Gabbard on his show several times, but never questioned Tulsi Gabbard's affiliation with the WEF "Young Leaders"...after all Tulsi Gabbard frequently marketed herself as "anti-establishment" but hailed from a highly suspect (((globalist))) organization.

I analyzed yer OP...yer a retarded Communist (redundant).    Did you vote for Biden?     
 

LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 4:39 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 4:39 am

Part 2 of ?



Tucker Carlson - oh boy, where to start...(TC's vids garner a relatively massive # of views compared to his cohorts on Fox News' YT channel so I will include him here on this list even though YT isn't his primary outlet)

Former neocon who had his nose up DUBYA'S *** (like most of you **** idiot Trumptards), then converted to liberTARDianism (Glenn Beck did the same thing...he started calling himself a "libertarian" to rebrand himself LMFAO, what's with these lame marketing tactics)...now he's like...some paleocon/faux nationalist who rants about "our evil/corrupt ruling class" every segment

Fun fact/Aside: TC rebranded himself as a paleocon/quasi-nationalist after he realized the proles hate LIBERTARDIANISM that advocates flooding our country with undesirable 3rd worlders/don't want to get raped by monopolies and major corps

If you listen to a few of his monologues, he has this seductive bent to all his Fox News segments, where he kind of/sort of calls out "people on both sides" and LURES the ignorant into thinking: "Tucker is a true journalist! He's the only one in the MSM telling us DA TROOF!!!11"   

TC is Prince Charming to an army of FN watching princesses. Other Fox anchors like Hannity/Ingraham don't even come close to TC in terms of aggregate ratings/YT video views

TC is a honeypot/spider web for malcontent Trumptards/Republicans who are growing increasingly bitter/resentful at "the political establishment." His goal is to channel that anger back into voting Republican so you can keep serving your corporate masters/oligarchs like a good debt slave/wage slave/tax donkey.

Every time election season swings around, he subtly manipulates the army of princesses to get **** again...by the likes of McConnell, Graham, "RINOs", etc. doing the bidding of (((International Financiers/Money Changers)))

TC wins my award for "master manipulator" 

You watch this crap so we don't have to. 

Thanks.

TuckTuck does populism like only a St George's/Trinity man could.
 

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am

I analyzed yer OP...yer a retarded Communist (redundant).    Did you vote for Biden?

I 'analyzed' his money, it's clear that it has to be a sok... a boring one...

 


 

How does the OP have 30 posts and 10,000+ in money. Looks like yet another retarded sock puppet.

Tip of the hat to @Selaphobia  for pointing this out on two bogus users.  Believe the other bogus user giving himself money is Ziggyx
 

Jantje_Smit » 27 Dec 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 8:42 am

I 'analyzed' his money, it's clear that it has to be a sok... a boring one...

Yep...his OP exposed him.   


Next?   lol

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 9:00 am

Yep...his OP exposed him.   

Next?   lol

lol Long winded sok too. I LOVE Tucker Carson.  

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am

I analyzed yer OP...yer a retarded Communist (redundant).    Did you vote for Biden?

this trolling would be interesting if it wasn’t so lazy.. if it was funny or something.

as it stands, it’s lightweight crap.. can’t address OP so attack the messenger.

you can do better.

LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 3:52 am

Hello everyone. Hope you enjoyed your Xmas!   

Here is a short list of popular political commentators + their political leanings to "prove" (substantiate) the idea that...well, (((YouTube))) wants you to be retarded/ignorant...by directing you into channels of misinformation/disinformation/mediocre arguments/shallow sophistry.

And maybe you ARE already retarded/ignorant, so nothing is gained or lost by you watching these channels...(heh) but still, I'd like to throw down the gauntlet and see if any of you can prove me wrong.

Part 1 of ?

1. Tim Pool - claims he is a "classical liberal" (I doubt he - or for that matter, most "classical liberals" - even knows what the term means, just like how most people can't define "capitalism," "socialism," "communism," "fascism," whateverism because...people are retarded lol)

Verdict: 100% for midwits / TP isn't particularly intelligent, even if he does make decent arguments every now and then; nothing out of the ordinary

Bonus: Ask a self-proclaimed "classical liberal" what economists like Smith/Ricardo/George (Georgian Economics) actually believed (snicker) and don't settle for vague responses...and get ready for some laughter. Don't let them cheat via search engines/Wikipedia either.

2. Joe Rogan - JR seems to oscillate from "Bernie Bro" style succdem (social democrat) to libertar(D)ianism...then back to succdemism whenever he feels like it. Then back to liberTARDianism. Coz reasons.

If I had to describe JR...he's an umbrella "anti-establishment" type...which is fine but shallow. Everybody who isn't a complete retard knows "the Establishment" is corrupt, so there's no point in rehashing this.

Verdict: 80-85% midwittery, not good for in-depth analysis. Still better than most political channels on YT (though that's a pretty low bar). Occasionally some interesting content but usually outside politics. 

Bonus: JR had Tulsi Gabbard on his show several times, but never questioned Tulsi Gabbard's affiliation with the WEF "Young Leaders"...after all Tulsi Gabbard frequently marketed herself as "anti-establishment" but hailed from a highly suspect (((globalist))) organization.

Most YT talking heads are fairly ignorant and brainwashed by decades of propaganda.

there is one guy, who FOS dislikes only cuz he’s not white enough, that speaks blunt, profound truth in many videos.  Highly relevant and powerful messaging from Elliott Hulse IMO



 
 
 

SJConspirator » 27 Dec 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 9:55 am

this trolling would be interesting if it wasn’t so lazy.. if it was funny or something.

as it stands, it’s lightweight crap.. can’t address OP so attack the messenger.

you can do better.

I did the right thing.  We both know how he would respond if I challenged him with evidence or anything else.


His OP was not factual. It was just a smear job, nothing more. So I returned the favor.


BTW...you just did the same thing to me. How ironic.     

Selaphobia » 27 Dec 2022, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 9:41 am

mentioned before, maybe you missed it? These numbers don't make sense.

So do you lose your own money when you plus vote a green one?

SJConspirator » 27 Dec 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 9:58 am

Most YT talking heads are fairly ignorant and brainwashed by decades of propaganda.

there is one guy, who FOS dislikes only cuz he’s not white enough, that speaks blunt, profound truth in many videos.  Highly relevant and powerful messaging from Elliott Hulse IMO

"Most YT talking heads are fairly ignorant and brainwashed by decades of propaganda."


Now yer doing the same thing you accused me of doing. There are names in the OP that are the opposite of what the OP claimed.


You should practice what you preach.   

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 8:22 am

I analyzed yer OP...yer a retarded Communist (redundant).    Did you vote for Biden?

Pedoroad,

Get back in your pedovan and shut up.
 

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 10:13 am

I did the right thing.  We both know how he would respond if I challenged him with evidence or anything else.

His OP was not factual. It was just a smear job, nothing more. So I returned the favor.

BTW...you just did the same thing to me. How ironic.   

We both know how he would respond if I challenged him with evidence or anything else.

Pedoroad,  please...

Blackvegetable » 27 Dec 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 10:46 am

Pedoroad,

Get back in your pedovan and shut up.

Nerve struck.      

roadkill » 27 Dec 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

27 Dec 2022, 10:23 am

"Most YT talking heads are fairly ignorant and brainwashed by decades of propaganda."

Now yer doing the same thing you accused me of doing. There are names in the OP that are the opposite of what the OP claimed.

You should practice what you preach.

I rather like JR and Tucker these days.  Kulinski used to be good, not anymore.  

Rogan is a sellout, booking Zuckerberg and Elon Musk on his show.  These billionaire globalists are the scourge of mankind, using money and power to reduce society to urban ruins, zombies wandering among garbage heaps.