when a person chooses faith over actual results, they are denying actual results justified in every reality where society defends deniers morally, legally, ethically, economically. No good deed goes unpunished by shame, flame, blame, shun, exile, execution for not complying with reality or humanity's dream state of minds life is more than reproductions being eternally separated now.LowIQTrash » 29 Dec 2022, 1:31 am » wrote: ↑ I can assure you I have no "contempt prior to investigation" for any of them...I simply analyzed the quality of their arguments/if they made any content worth watching/if they have ulterior motives. I believe I am more than qualified to judge these personalities.
As for being emotionally involved, I could care less about their political leanings/their personal characteristics. For example, I believe I was MORE than fair by claiming JR covers just about everything but is quite shallow in that his cross-examinations are not particularly strong, which allows certain individuals like Tulsi Gabbard (member of the WEF's "Young Leaders") to get away with propaganda. Or that Bernie Sanders is attempting to "start a revolution" but then urges his voters to throw their weight behind the candidate with a (D) next to their name when Sanders inevitably loses the nomination.
I know I seem to be playing a useless and all-to-common chatroom game.LowIQTrash » 30 Dec 2022, 2:27 am » wrote: ↑ If they were amateurs or if they displayed that level of humility, then I would avoid heaping criticism on them. However, as per Dunning Kruger syndrome, many of them are not like that, and in fact, seem very confident in their (alleged) abilities.
Roleplaying as a quasi-celebrity personality and being semi-decent at serious political commentary shouldn't be mutually exclusive. I have pretty stratospheric standards so what others may choose to overlook/find acceptable, I would not.
When you scroll down into the comments section heaping praise on someone like...Candace Owens (who I believe was funded by a Jewish talent agency, which is how she catapulted to fame almost overnight - National Justice Investigates: Rising Republican Party Influencers Got Their Start At Talent Agency Run By Israeli Pornographer, by Eric Striker - The Unz Review), who simply repeats the talking points her masters have told her to spew, I die a bit inside. Or I guffaw.
Depends on the day/mood.
Same here. I took the vax and **** on pro-vaxxers now.LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Only because he took the vaccine and then turned against pro-vaxxers...I believe that was the case?
He is more vocal than the rest, but I don't see much reason to revisit his channel.
I have no problems with answering your questions. If I failed to answer them then it would indicate my case is not strong enough. Hopefully I have met (my own) "stratospheric standards."DeezerShoove » 30 Dec 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ I know I seem to be playing a useless and all-to-common chatroom game.
But I'm nearly serious about this part:
You claimed to have stratospheric standards and that contrasts with my completely opposite low expectations.
We are looking at the same thing from different perches.![]()
ps
I hardly watch any of this performance art anymore.
Could be your Jewish conspiracy, could be plain old corporate greed pandering, whatever.
It's untrustworthy at best and destructive at worst.
You easily passed my low expectations.LowIQTrash » 02 Jan 2023, 3:42 am » wrote: ↑ I have no problems with answering your questions. If I failed to answer them then it would indicate my case is not strong enough. Hopefully I have met (my own) "stratospheric standards."
What are standards? Intellectually compared statistically averaged facts without regard to specific kinetic evolving doesn't exceed time each is spontaneously living simultaneously alive now since conceived to replace their previous 4 generation gaps having sibling living as displaced.LowIQTrash » 02 Jan 2023, 3:42 am » wrote: ↑ I have no problems with answering your questions. If I failed to answer them then it would indicate my case is not strong enough. Hopefully I have met (my own) "stratospheric standards." :faint: