This retarded dick sucker is APPLAUDING the censorship of medical professionals - thinks himself a "liberal."slideman » 30 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Regulators Move Against Two 'Misinformation' Doctors
— Peter McCullough, MD, and Sherri Tenpenny, DO, face new scrutiny
"Two doctors accused of spreading misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines are facing challenges from state and national medical organizations.
Peter McCullough, MD, and Sherri Tenpenny, DO, are facing scrutiny from a specialty board and a state medical board, respectively.
McCullough, who is still facing a lawsuit for allegedly using his former Baylor affiliation while conducting "dozens" of media appearances to share his contentious views on COVID-19 vaccines, told Steve Kirsch that his board certifications in internal medicine and cardiology were revoked last week by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM)."
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-re ... ves/101529
Oh, look - fact checkers and dick suckers forming a confederacy of dunces...slideman » 30 Dec 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Joe Rogan interview with Peter McCullough contains multiple false and unsubstantiated claims about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/ ... -vaccines/
This dick sucker ^ celebrates a bureaucracy attacking science and moving to deprive a man of his OWN CV.slideman » 30 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Baylor Gets Restraining Order Against COVID Vaccine Skeptic Doc
"The largest nonprofit health system in Texas has secured a temporary restraining order against cardiologist Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, a COVID-19 vaccine skeptic who allegedly continued to claim an affiliation with Baylor Scott & White Health months after he entered into a confidential separation agreement in which he agreed to stop mentioning his prior leadership and academic appointments."
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/958916
Oooh! Another "fact check."slideman » 30 Dec 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ US cardiologist makes false claims about Covid-19 vaccination
https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologi ... accination
That you have MADE it one shows how much you suck as a human, ***.
No, YOU did..Cannonpointer » 31 Dec 2022, 12:44 am » wrote: ↑ That you have MADE it one shows how much you suck as a human, ***.
Are you afraid that another of your spam generators is a fake?
It's not "libs v cons", **** *******.DeezerShoove » 30 Dec 2022, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That you don't see ANY correlation between libs demands and cons reluctance
is testimony to your bias.
Are you really this stupid or merely a paid troll, momma's boy?
Investigate it for yourself, ya **** intellectual slug.
It just happens to fall along lib/con fence by coincidence. Ok.Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2022, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ It's not "libs v cons", **** *******.
It's Science.
Hence "Sentients v Brain Dead Rubes"
No, not coincidence.DeezerShoove » 31 Dec 2022, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ It just happens to fall along lib/con fence by coincidence. Ok.
So you're saying all those side effects of the vax (which are NOT waning) should be ignored.Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2022, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ No, not coincidence.
Science and cons enjoy a tenuous relationship, triggering the paranoia of its lower orders is how it "progesses".
This isn't about covid....it's about how Grifty grossly mismanaged it, and the desperation of those who publicly praised his "professionalism and competence" to avoid the truth and themselves.
Just look at what drew your fellow idiotcons to Gorgeous George Santos.
DeezerShoove » 31 Dec 2022, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ So you're saying all those side effects of the vax (which are NOT waning) should be ignored.
The many doctors and scientists that suddenly threw their reputations and careers on the line were rendered idiots two years ago? Also to be ignored.
Now, as is your wont, you throw Santos into this stew of **** you cook up EVERY TIME you post.
He's a Johnny-come-lately to your "science be king" crap. Stay on topic, ****.
Liberal **** still think masks are a virtue. Just like being vaxxed. Very sciency...
I've said that exactly never.So you're saying all those side effects of the vax (which are NOT waning) should be ignored.
ask Dr. Fred Mercola about the money to be made on sham medicine.The many doctors and scientists that suddenly threw their reputations and careers on the line were rendered idiots two years ago? Also to be ignored.
******* plumber,Now, as is your wont, you throw Santos into this stew of **** you cook up EVERY TIME you post.
Have you considered that they might be immunosuppressed, asshole?Liberal **** still think masks are a virtue. Just like being vaxxed. Very sciency...
Since your response is basically a childish set of attempted insults,Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ I've said that exactly never.
ask Dr. Fred Mercola about the money to be made on sham medicine.
******* plumber,
Santos was prominent in protesting covid policy in schools. Santos is a TOTAL FAKE. But he sure can smell rubes...and ride them
Have you considered that they might be immunosuppressed, asshole?
if you want to make it more substantive, post your data and sources.DeezerShoove » 31 Dec 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Since your response is basically a childish set of attempted insults,
let's assume you're trying to add gravitas to weak arguments.
Not accepting any mildly contrasting viewpoint is your MO.
I prefer to take in the opposing view (innocent before proven guilty sort of thing).
Thanks for adding your talking points.
Copied this from a twitter account:Cannonpointer » 31 Dec 2022, 12:41 am » wrote: ↑ This dick sucker ^ celebrates a bureaucracy attacking science and moving to deprive a man of his OWN CV.
In this ***'s view, if a scientist goes against a bureaucracy, the bureaucracy should have the power to strip him of his resume.
No questions, dicksucker.Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2022, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Are you afraid that another of your spam generators is a fake?
***, do I need to bump the threadwhereyou suggested I should be SHOT for not letting your wall street masters control my body?
I still think so....even firmer in my conviction that is is a moral imperativeCannonpointer » 01 Jan 2023, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ ***, do I need to bump the threadwhereyou suggested I should be SHOT for not letting your wall street masters control my body?
Just how retarded are you, ya weak ***?
No one buys your bluff, ya weak piece of ****. You don't have the integrity to admit you go played - just like you got played into thinking "feelings" = "science," you midwit rube.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ I still think so....even firmer in my conviction that is is a moral imperative
I think I also recommended the use of bayonets....inefficient, but the emotional impact is an essential ingredient.Cannonpointer » 01 Jan 2023, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ No one buys your bluff, ya weak piece of ****. You don't have the integrity to admit you go played - just like you got played into thinking "feelings" = "science," you midwit rube.
It was your abenstee dad's job to make a man of you - not mine.
https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg