Yes, How does one achieve the level arrogance to argue AGAINST natural selection and still claim to be scientifically accurate?DeplorablePatriot » 08 Jan 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Humans are not meant to live in mixed race circumstances. It does nothing but create disharmony. It's a fact. In nature, an untouched ecosystem without humans is self-sustaining with a non-chaotic pattern of birth to death cycles without issue.
Human beings, when racially diverse within the same confines, is chaotic, malevolent for the races involved, and has no structure or meaningful purpose. Order becomes non-existent.
Don't mix races. Allow whites to enjoy their superiority without the introduction of a lesser, lower intellect and hostile species.
Any questions?
"Facts" aren't falsifiable, and SHOULD withstand challenge.SJConspirator » 09 Jan 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ so much projection here..
It is revealing that you think stating facts is not debate. It reveals that you don’t understand debate, which explains your inability to do it
No...let's be honest...It reveals that you don’t understand debate, which explains your inability to do it
I agree in a broad sense but would say that it is the variations in culture that cause the trouble. When I was a kid in New York City each ethnic group had it's own neighborhoods. We all got along on a business level but social interactions were very limited. This was, and probably still is, true with all ethnic groups, regardless of race. Among the Caucasians the Germans avoided the Italians who avoided the Jews who avoided those from eastern Europe. And everyone avoided the Irish. It's easy to see a man's skin color but there is much more complexity to the game.DeplorablePatriot » 08 Jan 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Humans are not meant to live in mixed race circumstances. It does nothing but create disharmony. It's a fact. In nature, an untouched ecosystem without humans is self-sustaining with a non-chaotic pattern of birth to death cycles without issue.
Human beings, when racially diverse within the same confines, is chaotic, malevolent for the races involved, and has no structure or meaningful purpose. Order becomes non-existent.
Don't mix races. Allow whites to enjoy their superiority without the introduction of a lesser, lower intellect and hostile species.
Any questions?
Re: OPSJConspirator » 09 Jan 2023, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑ dogs are “socialized” by their human masters.. and even that is iffy, I see little dogs go crazy barking and charging at big dogs. A chihuahua always intimidates a huge Rottweiler. There is a weird Rock Paper Scissors game with dogs and cats
ankle biter beats big dog
big dog beats cat
cat beats ankle biter
but to your point, it’s utterly unnatural for different dog breeds in the wild to be friendly. If you see a wolf pack, it’s not going to have token hyena tagging along. If you see a pack of wild hyenas, there won’t be a minority of dingos there.
by bringing up dogs, you have reinforced the point of the OP.. breeds only socialize with their own breed, no exceptions.
you said “no links”Selaphobia » 09 Jan 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Who said "no proof of your facts allowed "
if you dispute it, debate it.
bring your facts
Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2023, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Unless it finds something to **** first.
Where do you get this ****?
Of course they do.
They're called "mongrels"
diversity is an immutable reality.
Its the thing from planet Cannabis Sativa!nefarious101 » 09 Jan 2023, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's part of the progressive propaganda the progressive democratics and rinos idiocrats say doesn't exist.
Marvel just introduced their new "Thor" character.
Idiot. Those aren't races.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Jan 2023, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ The recovery of Germany after WWII was the result of thousands of workers from Portugal, Spain, and Turkey who came to Germany to compensate for the labor shortage.
If you examine the Nobel Prizes won by Americans, you will find that a disproportionate percentage of them were awarded to foreign born people who came to the US to study and stayed.
Japan became exceptional at building reliable cars efficiently by adopting the ideas of an American named W. Edward Deming.
Biodiversity among humans has worked and that is indisputable.

exactly, no way to prove his assertionsSelaphobia » 09 Jan 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ look at this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=72705
the OP had NO LINKS
ScottMon » 09 Jan 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, How does one achieve the level arrogance to argue AGAINST natural selection and still claim to be scientifically accurate?
Do I need to show you a link that proves you breathe? You liberals are play a game called "oblivious." All show...I hope. Are you THAT unworldly?Mrkelly » 09 Jan 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ exactly, no way to prove his assertions
and you think that is a debate?
maybe I missed your point or confused you with someone else
would your debate allow links to back up what you say or dispute what others say?
That is one odd replyDeplorablePatriot » 09 Jan 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Do I need to show you a link that proves you breathe? You liberals are play a game called "oblivious." All show...I hope. Are you THAT unworldly?
Mrkelly » 09 Jan 2023, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ That is one odd reply![]()
when you say **** like the OP in the thread you linked to says stupid ****, you should be able to call it out with proof
if you don’t allow links to back up facts it’s not a debate, it’s mental masturbation
you posted in a conversation that was talking about debating without linksDeplorablePatriot » 09 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I propose a debate? No, I did not. It's a subjective theory based upon years of observation. You don't agree? Fine. Run along but bring your bubble with you. I don't recycle those.
They are like the same people.Mrkelly » 09 Jan 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ you posted in a conversation that was talking about debating without links
you guys all blend together
The estrus cycles on lionesses and tigresses are quite different.SJConspirator » 09 Jan 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ liger = mixed offspring if a lion and tiger
The only ligers known to exist were born in captivity, in zoos.
Lions and tigers do cross paths in the wild, but never mate.
Why does this crossbreed not happen in nature, as it is clearly genetically feasible, possibly even favored on a cellular level, but not on a social level?
Explain, please. And I will answer any of your shabby questions, if they are on topic.
You have demonstrated that you have no clue what natural selection is. But its ok. You will never stop the cross-breeding of people of different skin colors.DeplorablePatriot » 09 Jan 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Bussing didn't work well, did it? Integration did nothing but cause problems. Mixing black and white IS NOT natural selection. Why try to disprove the obvious? Oh, I know, it's that liberal thingy you have going on.