slideman » 11 Jan 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ The Stupidity of White Supremacists
"Before any of you white supremacists out there start to object, I want to preface this by saying that I have nothing against white people. I’m white. Some of my best friends are white. And while I don’t subscribe to the doctrine of white supremacy, I know for a fact that there are a lot of white people out there who are quite articulate. Nevertheless, I can’t help but think you have to be pretty stupid to be a white supremacist."
https://blogs.princeton.edu/librarian/2 ... nt-page-1/
No need to generalize about yourself.B.Seeisashill » 09 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ There are loads of sience professionals on this forum telling all why climate chang and mandatory vaxxing be good for us. I would like to here why the coloreds have lower IQs than normal people.
No answer. lol
He has everything against white people. He despises himself.slideman » 11 Jan 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ The Stupidity of White Supremacists
"Before any of you white supremacists out there start to object, I want to preface this by saying that I have nothing against white people. I’m white. Some of my best friends are white. And while I don’t subscribe to the doctrine of white supremacy, I know for a fact that there are a lot of white people out there who are quite articulate. Nevertheless, I can’t help but think you have to be pretty stupid to be a white supremacist."
https://blogs.princeton.edu/librarian/2 ... nt-page-1/
I commend you for this. I didn't know you were smart enough to have intellectual curiosity before.Skans » 10 Jan 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ That is a thought provoking response. I would really like to delve into one of the studies. They would have to be published in journals somewhere. Even so, such publications rarely, if ever, allow folks like us access to their raw data. They would have to submit it for peer review, and the selected "peers" would have access to the data. Most, however, would likely glaze over it with their own biases one way or another. I think I could look at it objectively, mainly because it is a genuine curiosity of mine.
That would be you.
Sloppy retort. I'm speaking of the preponderance. Of course, there are exceptions. Like Dr. Ben Carson. You know...the black folks liberals call tokens and Uncle Tom. Who doesn't know that? Don't be a dummy.Xavier_Onassis » 11 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me ANY country or city where blacks have become both industrious, highly educated and non-volatile.'
This country has millions of Black people that fit all these criteria.
You are a disgusting and hateful bigot.
Skans » 09 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you cite me to a study that:
- administers IQ tests to people, denoting their racial makeup
- genetically tests each participant to determine the percentage of African Negroid each participant has
- discloses the sample sizes for each race tested and the genetic makeup of all participants
- provides the raw data for examination by 3rd parties.
- provides a copy of the IQ test used.
- has substantial sample sizes to negate large degrees of error.
coloreds? Is that racist?B.Seeisashill » 09 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ There are loads of sience professionals on this forum telling all why climate chang and mandatory vaxxing be good for us. I would like to here why the coloreds have lower IQs than normal people.
It's spelled SCIENCE.... ASSHOLE.B.Seeisashill » 09 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ There are loads of sience professionals on this forum telling all why climate chang and mandatory vaxxing be good for us. I would like to here why the coloreds have lower IQs than normal people.
On the contrary, if a bigoted pos is going to go through the trouble of creating a thread just to impugn an entire race of people, then I figure calling HIM out for his OWN RANK IGNORANCE is FAIR GAME.
While I tend to think that genetics (specifically racial genetics) and intelligence are significantly correlated, I don't know the degree of correlation nor have I seen this actually quantified. Further, if race and intelligence is objectively correlated, then does it explain all of the problems that have existed between various races? Is it possible that races capable of only specific levels of intelligence are not compatible with one another, without one race being subservient to the other?
The point is that there have been no such tests.
@FOS cited to two, I believe. Do you deny that they occurred? I haven't had any opportunity to look into them yet. Just asking.
Skans » 12 Jan 2023, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ While I tend to think that genetics (specifically racial genetics) and intelligence are significantly correlated, I don't know the degree of correlation nor have I seen this actually quantified. Further, if race and intelligence is objectively correlated, then does it explain all of the problems that have existed between various races? Is it possible that races capable of only specific levels of intelligence are not compatible with one another, without one race being subservient to the other?
Anecdotal evidence. Here's a link to some black inventors. So, your "observation" is now negated.SJConspirator » 12 Jan 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need a big sample size to just look at history and see that all the great discoveries and inventions were made by white people
Skans » 12 Jan 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ Anecdotal evidence. Here's a link to some black inventors. So, your "observation" is now negated.