Santos looks like a prick that needs to go.kcres » 19 Jan 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of crying, What's the Right's take on George Santos? Or even Kyle Rittenhouse?
I like the Rittenhouse idea - but do a thought experiment.RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2023, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Santos looks like a prick that needs to go.
Maybe we could replace him with Rittenhouse.
inaccurate about the whole.Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2023, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I like the Rittenhouse idea - but do a thought experiment.
Pretend Santos was doing performance art.
GENIUS - amirite?
Now, pretend is wasn't.
Still **** genius - just Forrest Gump quality genius rather than Andy Kaufman quality genius.
that was funny.
I said performance art, not perform a fart.Nostradamus'omh » 28 Jan 2023, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ inaccurate about the whole.
specific to a single talking poiont detail. right and accurate are separate new world orders left evolving in shadows of reasonable doubt being the greater good saving humanity's speculation now isn't eternity.
type cast personalities as defined by rule of law leading ancestries to perform as stereotypes arranged academically, artistically, economically, spiritually, politically taking sides to disprove life is self contained to the moment here theoretically and theologically serving god and country protected by rule of law anyone denying reality commits a hate crime against humanity making tomorrows better than genetics populated the species as numbers here so far.