Nice diversion. VG.ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe it should be different in this country?
You know, like it would be legal for Hot Babe Teachers to **** their 14 year old male students.
But female students would have to wait until they were 21 before anybody could **** them.
(just throwing that out there as food for thought)
Well. I will revert back to my original premise: 'Private Property'. Read the Rules before entering.Huey » 14 Jan 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice diversion. VG.
The thread is about a monor female being subject to seeing a naked man in a womens locker room. It appears you support this.
I wonder if your daddy, @Blackvegetable , supports this as well. He has a daughter and argued this would never happen.
No, ******* Ca law, VG.ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Well. I will revert back to my original premise: 'Private Property'. Read the Rules before entering.
Maybe a large 'Transgender Sign' in front of the Locker Rooms would help?
Or, maybe you and you Communist Cell could take over the Government and establish a Big Brother State?
Huey. Admit you are a Communist and want to Road Boss everybody around.Huey » 14 Jan 2023, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ******* Ca law, VG.
Maybe tyou could stop being a ******* for a minute. N you were a ******* as vagas giants and you are a ******* now.
You would subject your own daughter to this ****.
What if that large sign said "No Transgenders Allowed"?ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Well. I will revert back to my original premise: 'Private Property'. Read the Rules before entering.
Maybe a large 'Transgender Sign' in front of the Locker Rooms would help?
Or, maybe you and you Communist Cell could take over the Government and establish a Big Brother State?
That might be like 'No Coloreds Allowed'?RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ What if that large sign said "No Transgenders Allowed"?
But it's private property, right?
Hmmm ...RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2023, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ But it's private property, right?
What are you, part of a Communist Cell that wants to take over the Government and establish a Big Brother State?
So are you suggesting that they should be forced to allow transgenders in the locker rooms, regardless, or no?ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Hmmm ...
It could be 'Private Property', but
1. Open to the Public. (everybody)
2. Members Only. (private)
Well, in my opinion, if you have a penis, you should go to where the 'penis' go.RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ So are you suggesting that they should be forced to allow transgenders in the locker rooms, regardless, or no?
Are you **** up?
Possibly.DeezerShoove » 14 Jan 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you **** up?
It's the mental case that it's attached to, bonehead.
Yup. You're **** in the head.ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Possibly.
If it was Brad Pitt, she probably wouldn't have complained.
I'm sorry.
It is quite apparent, Vega Giants, that you are anti woman, hate women, and are not supportive of biological females having a space of their own.ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Huey. Admit you are a Communist and want to Road Boss everybody around.
Nobody is forcing Miss Goody Two Shoes into going to the YMCA.
Why do you hate America, Huey?
Well, on a traditional cultural level, I don't see the Big Deal about people using their own separate Locker Room. I'm used to that.Huey » 14 Jan 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ It is quite apparent, Vega Giants, that you are anti woman, hate women, and are not supportive of biological females having a space of their own.
You are a ******. But I would not support you hanging out in their locker rooms.
Maybe the person 'looked' like a woman, ... until 'she' turned around and caught the teen off guard?Justthetruth » 14 Jan 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ She must really wanted that dick.
Damn crying over penis.
What race was the fake dick pervert?ZiggyX » 14 Jan 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe the person 'looked' like a woman, ... until 'she' turned around and caught the teen off guard?