mccarthy should be held for treason.
jerrab » 15 Jan 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ the old republican double standard, it is great when trump did it but anyone else not so much.

yep another display of the good old double standard, no problem whatsoever if Xiden did it.jerrab » 15 Jan 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ yep another display of the good old double standard, no problem whatsoever if trump did it.
but no mention of trump's company cheating the irs and the american taxpayer for years.
I probably would not vote for biden.Warcok » 15 Jan 2023, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑ yep another display of the good old double standard, no problem whatsoever if Xiden did it.
Don't you worry your pretty little head none. The SCOTUS already ruled that Congress can request the tax records of anyone including the current president of the United States.jerrab » 15 Jan 2023, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ but no mention of trump's company cheating the irs and the american taxpayer for years.
the old double standard strikes again,
lol
I am not worried about it. I know he is a fink.Warcok » 15 Jan 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't you worry your pretty little head none. The SCOTUS already ruled that Congress can request the tax records of anyone including the current president of the United States.
where is the trampling of republican voters to get trump investigated?Huey » 14 Jan 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
As I posted yesterday there are differences in the cases being made and investigations. Of course. No two cases are the same,
But the issue is the same. They both possessed classified documentation AFTER they left office.
Nod,
like what trump always claims.Rock » 14 Jan 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the pre dawn raid on Biden's home from the FBI? Someone needs to go through Jill's drawers.![]()
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white- ... aware-home
5 more classified documents found at Biden's Delaware home, White House lawyer says
Wow. 0 out of 3.golfboy » 15 Jan 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ There is no requirement he notify the archives about anything.
The FBI had no reason to be there when the Archives were still negotiating which documents were to be turned over.
And Joe had NO legal right to even possess those documents, which he allowed felons and probably Chinese spies to access at will.
golfboy » 15 Jan 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ There is no requirement he notify the archives about anything.
The FBI had no reason to be there when the Archives were still negotiating which documents were to be turned over.
And Joe had NO legal right to even possess those documents, which he allowed felons and probably Chinese spies to access at will.
Mr.7 » 15 Jan 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ Looks like Buttismygig will be the shoe-in for the dems in 2024. Right Libbies?
the acquittal means zilch.Mr.7 » 15 Jan 2023, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ What a ******* you are.
Donald Trump Has Been Acquitted Again. But He Faces an …
https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-acq ... “Everybody knows the outcome of this proceeding, which is that President Trump is going to be acquitted,” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said Saturday, hours before the final vote. When …Donald Trump acquitted by Senate in second impeachment trial
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/13/senate-acquits...WebThe Senate on Saturday acquitted former President Donald Trump in a 57-43 vote on the charge of inciting insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
---------------------In 1951, Roosevelt's successor, Harry S. Truman, issued Executive Order 10290, which not only set up a standardized classification system and markings for documents, but also established an orderly process for declassifying documents that were no longer deemed sensitive. It required the agency declassifying a document to notify any other agency that might have an interest in the question of whether it should remain confidential.------------------------------------Huey » 14 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden lied about all documents have been found, Meghan.
(Meghan Markle, the spoiled princess)
You ain’t ****, Christine.