lol. Pretty much. It’s sad
I thought @Lucifershammer did a rather good job. I don't have the time either to run a forum, nor the technical expertise in that area. @teacher would be another I'd consider. I don't really care if some of the spammers or rule-breakers didn't like these folks. ****, I'd even allow them to have a bit of fun once in awhile by temporarily changing people's names to something more to their liking - for a couple of days only, but let 'em have some fun at the obnoxious forum members' expense!Imgreatagain » 23 Jan 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ I’m just not sure I have the time to fool with it. I’d probably buy it and let someone handle it. Any takers?
It's a demonstrably gay sport, aimed primarily at men who are closeted. It's for *** lovers. Not my problem.Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ The government owns a football team - sounds pretty socialist to me. It would be more politically correct to rename the team the African Packers:
Rock » 23 Jan 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Cool video. Oh btw, I hate the Steelers with a burning passion.
I'm with you. Too many *** kneeling and beating their wives and becoming millionaires for it.Selaphobia » 14 Jan 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Do not own a television. I smashed it when Collin Kaepernick took a knee. **** no I don’t watch football either. Oh also **** BLM and NO systemic racism does not exist and if you don’t listen to what the police ask you to do you could end up dead. Also **** that don’t taze me bro ****.
George Floyd is responsible for his own death
If you did buy it Atomic? could you get help? I imagine it can be a bit complicated.Imgreatagain » 23 Jan 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ it seems as though that may be the only way to get it up and running. He seems pretty done with it
Stealers? ***.Rock » 23 Jan 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Cool video. Oh btw, I hate the Steelers with a burning passion.
Rock » 23 Jan 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Cool video. Oh btw, I hate the Steelers with a burning passion.
The Eagles didn't do half bad either.roadkill » 23 Jan 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The Bengals were the smoothest winning team this weekend. That's why I pick them to win the Super Bowl.
I would much rather see a Bengals/Eagles matchup it the SB than either of the other possible scenarios.
RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I would much rather see a Bengals/Eagles matchup it the SB than either of the other possible scenarios.
That would be the best game for the money.
No one is forcing you to participate in this thread.DeplorablePatriot » 23 Jan 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You guys diminish yourselves by supporting these dirt-stupid, millionaire, racist sport ***.
great question. He said it’s pretty easy to run. I’m just not sure if I want to bother with it either.sootedupCyndi » 23 Jan 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ If you did buy it Atomic? could you get help? I imagine it can be a bit complicated.
Larry Csonka gone fishin'....
Did you see the line on the Cincy/KC game flip in a matter of hours?roadkill » 26 Jan 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Larry Csonka gone fishin'....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBEJw5B3K-k
RedheadedStranger » 26 Jan 2023, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you see the line on the Cincy/KC game flip in a matter of hours?
They posted KC favored by 3 initially, and everybody started going with the Bengals, so the bookies had to "adjust".