The data does not back up your claim. The data is out there... not going to spoon feed it to you. The sources are the Census, drivers license surrender database, UHaul annual survey, and Current population survey microdata. I know that you are too lazy to actually do the research unlike myself.
If you went to that bother, good on you. Reminds me of me.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ The data does not back up your claim. The data is out there... not going to spoon feed it to you. The sources are the Census, drivers license surrender database, UHaul annual survey, and Current population survey microdata. I know that you are too lazy to actually do the research unlike myself.
And from years on internet forums, here is what happens.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ If you went to that bother, good on you. Reminds me of me.
Except that I would share it.
No, I do not agree. I present government sources confidently, and let them make asses of themselves.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ And from years on internet forums, here is what happens.
I spend hours digging through data, compiling it, and lining it up. The reader just talks a bunch of **** and says, "it is from a government source and so it is inherently garbage". I then ask, "Well then what other source is there? Can you put one forth?". They then respond with calling me names. Sounds like a waste of time to me. And having done this dance before... seems like I should learn? Would you not agree?
JUST LIKE THE LAST LINKS I SHOWED YOU A FEW POSTS BACK, AND THIS ONE HERE, YOU STILL HAVE NOT SHOWN ONE **** LINK TO BACK ANY OF YOUR IDIOTIC AND COMPLETE FALSE ASSERTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT CALI. WHAT A *******impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ The data does not back up your claim. The data is out there... not going to spoon feed it to you. The sources are the Census, drivers license surrender database, UHaul annual survey, and Current population survey microdata. I know that you are too lazy to actually do the research unlike myself.
He claims to have perfectly lovely government sources to back his position. Says he won't post them.Mr.7 » 18 Jan 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ JUST LIKE THE LAST LINKS I SHOWED YOU A FEW POSTS BACK, AND THIS ONE HERE, YOU STILL HAVE NOT SHOWN ONE **** LINK TO BACK ANY OF YOUR IDIOTIC AND COMPLETE FALSE ASSERTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT CALI. WHAT A DUNBASS
California's 'woke' revolution is driving out blacks and …
https://nypost.com/2020/07/30/californias-woke...WebJul 30, 2020 · Based on US Census Bureau cost-of-living estimates, 28 percent of California’s blacks live in poverty, compared with 22 percent …
More people leaving California than moving in: Is the …https://abc30.com/why-are-people-leaving...WebMar 17, 2021 · California has experienced more than a century of rapid growth, spurred by the Gold Rush and industrial booms in farming, oil drilling, entertainment, aerospace and big tech. But in recent...
YOU ARE EMBARRASSING YOURSELF
Prove it. At this point, you're ****.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑The data does not back up your claim.
But he IS willing to spoon feed it to you. He did so. If you COULD debunk his source, you WOULD debunk his source. You're full of **** and your pants are on fire.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑The data is out there... not going to spoon feed it to you.
Lovely - roll it out, and put THIS to rout:impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ The sources are the Census, drivers license surrender database, UHaul annual survey, and Current population survey microdata. I know that you are too lazy to actually do the research unlike myself.
I say you're bluffing out your ***. You're full of ****, and you just got your *** handed to you. If you could rescue your thesis, you would. You can't. I WOULD say nice try, but it was lame.Based on US Census Bureau cost-of-living estimates, 28 percent of California’s blacks live in poverty, compared with 22 percent nationally. One-third of Latinos, the state’s largest ethnic group, live in poverty, compared with 21 percent nationally.
Since 1990, Los Angeles’s black share of the population has dropped in half. Blacks constitute barely 5 percent of San Francisco’s population, down from 13 percent four decades ago. A recent poll found that 58 percent of African Americans express interest in leaving the state; 45 percent of Asians and Latinos are also considering moving out.
Exactly....all LIP service. Not one link.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ He claims to have perfectly lovely government sources to back his position. Says he won't post them.
Raises doubts - especially with you throwing links. Sounds like he's ****.
While accusing YOU - the sole provider of MSM links - of being too lazy to do the research.
Well, I do appreciate your stating that fact, (which is I most certainly provide the data to back-up what I post). And I don't take no CRAP from anyone....right Fruity?Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ While accusing YOU - the sole provider of MSM links - of being too lazy to do the research.
A new level in blufftardation.
Another link...and you have provided none...zilch...zero...nada.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ And from years on internet forums, here is what happens.
I spend hours digging through data, compiling it, and lining it up. The reader just talks a bunch of **** and says, "it is from a government source and so it is inherently garbage". I then ask, "Well then what other source is there? Can you put one forth?". They then respond with calling me names. Sounds like a waste of time to me. And having done this dance before... seems like I should learn? Would you not agree?
CORRECT, eggplant.Mr.7 » 18 Jan 2023, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I do appreciate your stating that fact, (which is I most certainly provide the data to back-up what I post). And I don't take no CRAP from anyone....right Fruity?
Can you just imagne what their numbers would be if their border were closed? The number accounts for those leaving and those arriving. Without new illegals bumping their numbers, they'd look even worse.Mr.7 » 18 Jan 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Another link...and you have provided none...zilch...zero...nada.
California's population keeps declining, US census data shows
https://www.foxla.com/news/california-p ... dataWebDec 26, 2022 · Latest figures released last week showed California ’s resident population at 39,029,342 in July 2022, a decline of more than 113,000 since July 2021 and down more than a half-million people ...
20 pounds of human poop found on San Francisco sidewalk | San Luis ...Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you just imagne what their numbers would be if their border were closed? The number accounts for those leaving and those arriving. Without new illegals bumping their numbers, they'd look even worse.
I HAVE CRUSHED YOU WITH LINKS. OH, AND I ACCEPT YOUR CONCESSION.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ And from years on internet forums, here is what happens.
I spend hours digging through data, compiling it, and lining it up. The reader just talks a bunch of **** and says, "it is from a government source and so it is inherently garbage". I then ask, "Well then what other source is there? Can you put one forth?". They then respond with calling me names. Sounds like a waste of time to me. And having done this dance before... seems like I should learn? Would you not agree?
Your first link is behind a paywall. Here is the story from an open source: