golfboy » 15 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ The Sierra Nevadas are the source.
Have you NOT seen the videos of the rivers of water running out to the sea right now?
Liberals won't ever do anything to solve the water problem because they are more interested in controlling everyone, and water use is one of the best ways to do that.
I accept your concession.Monderegal » 15 Jan 2023, 7:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Well you are supposed to serve from the consent of the governed according to John Locke who had a large influence on the founding fathers. It seems that Trump probably served his own whims and not the public. Your enthusiasm and level of support is evidence of that.
That's true.......VERY TRUE.....Monderegal » 15 Jan 2023, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberals don't want people to have water to drink because they want to overrun our high school curriculum. Earth is a nice place. Live there sometimes.
You wanna try to kill members of Congress because Trump is mad he lost the election? It actually makes sense to people who follow the "real" news. Do you have any philosophical framework for it? You know like the governing kind? There are actual conservative arguments that hold weight with me. Trump just kind seems like a comical rendition. That's why he deranges the learned mind.
https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVP.YAcjiSCI ... .3&pid=1.7Monderegal » 15 Jan 2023, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You wanna try to kill members of Congress because Trump is mad he lost the election? It actually makes sense to people who follow the "real" news. Do you have any philosophical framework for it? Perhaps Trump was working in the best interest of the people.
It's too bad no one has channeled the flood waters into them.Xavier_Onassis » 15 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑ There are lakes and reservoirs all over Southern California.
If there were no sources, they wouldn't be flooding - now, would they.Monderegal » 15 Jan 2023, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't just build a reservoir. It needs a source. Desalination would be an option though if it were able to get through the LA city council.
In their defense, inventing new sciences and corrupting existing ones is time consuming.golfboy » 15 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ The Sierra Nevadas are the source.
Have you NOT seen the videos of the rivers of water running out to the sea right now?
Liberals won't ever do anything to solve the water problem because they are more interested in controlling everyone, and water use is one of the best ways to do that.
In Las Vegas, they do what THEY'RE supposed to do. They build the infrastructure necessary to keep their citizens safe.nuckinfutz » 15 Jan 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ They do what they are supposed to do, and that is capture snow melt and floodwaters!![]()
So? California is not Las Vegas!Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2023, 2:34 am » wrote: ↑ In Las Vegas, they do what THEY'RE supposed to do. They build the infrastructure necessary to keep their citizens safe.
L.A. was built with fed money - so what?nuckinfutz » 16 Jan 2023, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ So? California is not Las Vegas!
And the Hoover Dam was built with Fed money!
Read; "Cadillac Desert" great expose of all the damn dams that were needlessly built, and how they failed.![]()
![]()
![]()
It is a desert there. Hardly ever rains! Not like CAL!Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ L.A. was built with fed money - so what?
You damn betcha cali is not las vegas. In las vegas, flood waters are DIRECTED, not let to run wild on the people.
You poor thing.nuckinfutz » 16 Jan 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a desert there. Hardly ever rains! Not like CAL!
Invalid comparison!
You need to stop embarassing yourself, you can't get new members that way!![]()
ops:
ops:
ops:
If I look at Las Vegas, I see that it is NOT IN CALIFORNIA, nor is it close to any river likely to spill out of its banks.Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2023, 2:30 am » wrote: ↑ It's too bad no one has channeled the flood waters into them.
If you look at Las Vegas, it is a city in a bowl, built on soil as hard as concrete. Yet no one's home ever floods. The roads don't flood. The politicians listened to the technocrats - not the enviro-whackjobs.
FDR proved that better government gets better results. The obvious corrolary is that worse government gets worse results.
California is getting worse results. Maybe they need some of those Nevada ranchers to come and run their state properly. A bit more focus on infrastructure and a bit less focus on diapering every pisser and moaner.
Explain yourself.Mr.7 » 15 Jan 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Environmental groups since the late 50’s and early 60’s have prevented forest culling and water sheds being built. The disasters in CA are/were preventable but ignored, for increased taxation.
What? you mean those solar panels and windmills aren't providing power?
California flooding: At least 17 people dead, more than 200,000 homes, businesses without power | Fox News2023
So is engineering - but where the money goes is decided by politics.Xavier_Onassis » 17 Jan 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ If I look at Las Vegas, I see that it is NOT IN CALIFORNIA, nor is it close to any river likely to spill out of its banks.
Water and rivers are nonpartisan.
20 is the last count I heard.Mr.7 » 17 Jan 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ What is it now....thousands of classified docks stolen by biden?
Biden's counsel finds five more classified pages at president's Delaware home
Biden's counsel finds five more classified pages at president's Delaware home (msn.com)