Nothing says "integrity" and "character" like changing someone's quote to make it look like they said something they never said.
liberals have thier good points.sootedupCyndi » 21 Jan 2023, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ ha ha.. You could have fooled me- I thought you was a liberal.
and it was so sneaky and underhanded, everyone fell for the ruse.RedheadedStranger » 21 Jan 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Nothing says "integrity" and "character" like changing someone's quote to make it look like they said something they never said.
Nice.

yes and no.Warcok » 21 Jan 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ President Trump had the authority to declassify whatever his administration classified and keep it.
Buffalo » 21 Jan 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ That remains to be determined when it is revealed exactly.....
.MackTheFinger » 21 Jan 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ In this day and age between the satanic socialist ultraliberal agenda driven media and the right-wing spin machine...no one can tell what the actual truth is...anyhow
Exactly. So President Trump was not in possession of top secret classified nuclear codes or documents because he declassified them and this is nothing more than a petty dispute between President Trump and NARA over who rightfully owes what documents.maineman » 21 Jan 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ yes and no.
authority to declassify? yes
retain ownership? no
Except for the fact that the mere act of declassifying a document does not magically make the contents of that document any less capable of being used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any other foreign nation.Warcok » 21 Jan 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. So President Trump was not in possession of top secret classified nuclear codes or documents because he declassified them and this is nothing more than a petty dispute between President Trump and NARA over who rightfully owes what documents.
Justthetruth » 18 Jan 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I notice you have no link.
This is because ypu just made it up.
Well thank God he had the proper locks on the door the government recommended and the secret service there to protect them.maineman » 21 Jan 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Except for the fact that the mere act of declassifying a document does not magically make the contents of that document any less capable of being used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any other foreign nation.
There are no locks at Mar-a-Lago that provide the level of security available at a SCIF. The secret service was not there to protect documents. they protect the ex-president and when he goes off to Bedminster, they go with him. And while he's gone, Mar-a-Lago is being used as a public function hall. There is absolutely ZERO evidence that all of the sensitive documents at Mar-a-Lago were kept in places that wandering curious wedding guests could not find their way into. There is ZERO evidence the guest lists for all of those receptions and retirement dinners and bachelor parties held at Mar-a-Lago were vetted to insure that none of those guests were foreign agents.Warcok » 21 Jan 2023, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Well thank God he had the proper locks on the door the government recommended and the secret service there to protect them.
Maybe you could go over and volunteer to fight the Russians.... I am sure that the Ukrainians have a mail van that needs a driver.MackTheFinger » 21 Jan 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑
.
.Buffalo...what do you think about this...fake news or what ?
AWOL Navy SEAL Killed Fighting Russian Forces In Ukraine
https://www.dailywire.com/news/awol-nav ... in-ukraine
you suck sausage links
Isn't it passed Johnnie's bed time?
MackTheFinger » 21 Jan 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑
.
.Buffalo...what do you think about this...fake news or what ?
AWOL Navy SEAL Killed Fighting Russian Forces In Ukraine
https://www.dailywire.com/news/awol-nav ... in-ukraine
Mar-a-Lago is more secure than Xiden's garage where Hunter Biden was paying his daddy $50,000 a month to live there and drive his Corvette with the top secret nuclear codes in the trunk with his niece who he was molesting.maineman » 21 Jan 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ There are no locks at Mar-a-Lago that provide the level of security available at a SCIF. The secret service was not there to protect documents. they protect the ex-president and when he goes off to Bedminster, they go with him. And while he's gone, Mar-a-Lago is being used as a public function hall. There is absolutely ZERO evidence that all of the sensitive documents at Mar-a-Lago were kept in places that wandering curious wedding guests could not find their way into. There is ZERO evidence the guest lists for all of those receptions and retirement dinners and bachelor parties held at Mar-a-Lago were vetted to insure that none of those guests were foreign agents.

maineman » 21 Jan 2023, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Isn't it passed Johnnie's bed time?
Seriously.... are you out of middle school?
I can't help but to wonder why the secret service did not stop the FBI from entering Maralago? Since president Trump had not declined SS protection I am sure they were there, at least in small, but capable, numbers. I suppose we'll never know.Warcok » 18 Jan 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ DOJ lawyers were the only ones allowed in to gather up all the top secret nuclear codes.
Gargoyle Garland sends heavily armed FBI agents with AK-47's to raid President Trump's home, but sends a team of lawyers heavily armed with hammers and bleachbit to raid Xiden's house.![]()
I could give a flying **** who you "trust"me with.Taipan » 21 Jan 2023, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Tom Homan has a Texas backbone.
I can trust him.
He will protect this country.
You...........will not.
I will not trust you with my children.......or my country.
Are we clear ?