Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:41 pm

That what Rob Hur is going to find out, hopefully...

and Jack Smith

Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:39 pm

Guilty of stealing classified papers.  When he was a Senator.  When he was the Vice President.  He certainly did hold onto classified papers, and never even told government officials where they were being kept.  Trump completely cooperated with the FBI.  Biden's lawyers wouldn't even allow the FBI inside his residence.  The man is a guilty-as-Manson crook.

what federal criminal statute do you think Biden violated?

maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm

and Jack Smith

Yep.

There are separate, yet equally important issues that need to be investigated thoroughly.
 

maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:43 pm

what federal criminal statute do you think Biden violated?

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
 

Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

I knew there was one, I just didn't feel like looking it up.

 
 

Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha

Tough to prove intent - which is a critical element of the crime.
 

maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:48 pm

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha

Tough to prove intent - which is a critical element of the crime.

I'm pretty sure that's the same criminal code that was being tossed around after the Mar a Lago raid.

 
 

maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:48 pm

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha

Tough to prove intent - which is a critical element of the crime.

HA HA HA HA HA - THE LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT INTENT!!!        
 

RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:52 pm

I'm pretty sure that's the same criminal code that was being tossed around after the Mar a Lago raid.

Democrats like @maineman  are such whiny hypocrites.

RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:17 pm

That's because "supposedly" they didn't know Biden had the docs in the first place.

They knew Trump had his.

Personally, I would say Biden's case borders on espionage.

​​​​​​

I really disagree.  It's not like Biden traded secrets with other countries.  
 

ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 5:15 pm

I really disagree.  It's not like Biden traded secrets with other countries.

That we know of.
​​​​​
 

Apples and oranges.

President Trump was never in possession of top secret classified documents

Senator Xiden stoled top secret classified documents and nuclear codes.

One violated the espionage act and the other didn't.

Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:53 pm

HA HA HA HA HA - THE LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT INTENT!!!      

of course it does.  Can you read?


Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents 

Warcok » 23 Jan 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 5:27 pm

Apples and oranges.

President Trump was never in possession of top secret classified documents

Senator Xiden stoled top secret classified documents and nuclear codes.

One violated the espionage act and the other didn't.

nuclear codes?

hahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha

maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 5:57 pm

nuclear codes?

hahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha

So it's okay for Xiden to have the Duke nukem codes but not Trump?

Hypocrite!
 

Warcok » 23 Jan 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 6:05 pm

So it's okay for Xiden to have the Duke nukem codes but not Trump?

Hypocrite!

neither of them had "nuclear codes" you stupid inbred moron.

RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 5:16 pm

That we know of.
​​​​​

Same could be said for Trump.  There's an allegation that Trump traded secrets with North Korea to stop the nuke manufactuering.
 

Skans » 23 Jan 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 4:39 pm

Guilty of stealing classified papers.  When he was a Senator.  When he was the Vice President.  He certainly did hold onto classified papers, and never even told government officials where they were being kept.  Trump completely cooperated with the FBI.  Biden's lawyers wouldn't even allow the FBI inside his residence.  The man is a guilty-as-Manson crook.

Trump spent a year rejecting requests for those papers.  He was "negotiating.."  
 

ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 6:44 pm

Same could be said for Trump.  There's an allegation that Trump traded secrets with North Korea to stop the nuke manufactuering.

Allegation
 

ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 6:44 pm

 There's an allegation that Trump traded secrets with North Korea to stop the nuke manufactuering.

.I wanna see the Trump Pee Tape the satanic socialist ultraliberal agenda driven media talked about so much about.  ScottMon do you know when will it be released ?  A Media Research Center study found at the height of the Trump allegation CNN talked about the non-existent “pee tapes” 77 times in a mere five-day period.

Since CNN & Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) said that "something close" to the long-rumored “pee tape” exists...going on to say ''it's likely Putin has something on President Trump."