What really happened.........Warcok » 18 Jan 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ DOJ lawyers were the only ones allowed in to gather up all the top secret nuclear codes.
Gargoyle Garland sends heavily armed FBI agents with AK-47's to raid President Trump's home, but sends a team of lawyers heavily armed with hammers and bleachbit to raid Xiden's house.![]()
Misty » 23 Jan 2023, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑ What really happened.........
Biden's own attorneys invited the FBI to conduct the search of his home.
The Former Guy stonewalled and lied to investigators which is why they had no choice but to execute a search warrant.
Steal one hubcap and you're a thief.Misty » 23 Jan 2023, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑Biden's own attorneys invited the FBI to conduct the search of his home.
The Former Guy stonewalled and lied to investigators which is why they had no choice but to execute a search warrant.
Intelligence is the capacity a brain has to recognize self evident evolving from power of suggesting nobody knows how evolving works in plain sight becomes a social historical consensus within their own ancestry and species populating space now.MackTheFinger » 23 Jan 2023, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ .
Writing a long sentence is not a sign of intellagance...it is a sigh of trying to impress the readers.
.
.
.![]()
I can read. "removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location"maineman » 23 Jan 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ of course it does. Can you read?
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents
so... you **** up and didn't read that the law mentions intent? Color me all sorts of surprised by that!!! You have no idea what he INTENDED to do. They need to prove he intended to retain them there.... and all he needs to say is that it was not his intent to do so and that he forgot they were there. You should stick to flipping burger and leave legal opinions to someone better equipped.Skans » 24 Jan 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ I can read. "removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location"Biden is guilty, guilty, guilty!!!
- The documents have been in his private residence for years - possibly decades. Clearly he intended to retain the documents.
- They don't need to prove he INTENDED to remove the documents.
- The documents were marked "CLASSIFIED" - so, there's no denying that he didn't know the documents were classified.
on what charge? what statute did he violate?FJB » 24 Jan 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ Biden had classified documents since he was a Senator.... Jail him
name the statute you think he violated.
Hey Matlock, intent is not required for it to be a crime. But clearly having those classified documents in multiple locations for years is proof of intent.maineman » 24 Jan 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ so... you **** up and didn't read that the law mentions intent? Color me all sorts of surprised by that!!! You have no idea what he INTENDED to do. They need to prove he intended to retain them there.... and all he needs to say is that it was not his intent to do so and that he forgot they were there. You should stick to flipping burger and leave legal opinions to someone better equipped.
If mere possession were synonymous with intent to retain, then intent to retain wouldn't be an element of the crime.theBuffalo » 24 Jan 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Matlock, intent is not required for it to be a crime. But clearly having those classified documents in multiple locations for years is proof of intent.
I want to know what braindead biden and his crackhead son did with them during that time. Why is that question not being asked.
Oh, officer, I did not intent to drive 80 mph in that 55 mph speed zone. Do you think that LIE matters to the officer?
You should stick to dumpster diving behind the burger barn fo you meals...
I can't prove it either way, But I can prove that Trump pretty much did whatever Putin wanted him to do.MackTheFinger » 23 Jan 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ .I wanna see the Trump Pee Tape the satanic socialist ultraliberal agenda driven media talked about so much about. ScottMon do you know when will it be released ? A Media Research Center study found at the height of the Trump allegation CNN talked about the non-existent “pee tapes” 77 times in a mere five-day period.
Since CNN & Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) said that "something close" to the long-rumored “pee tape” exists...going on to say ''it's likely Putin has something on President Trump."
ScottMon » 24 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I can't prove it either way, But I can prove that Trump pretty much did whatever Putin wanted him to do.
37 times Trump was soft on Russia | CNN Politics
You cannot change the fact that documents were found that were taken during Biden’s years in the Senate. Their excuses of transparency disappeared when those older documents were found that have been in braindead's possession for years. No intent has now been exposed as a LIE!!!maineman » 24 Jan 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ If mere possession were synonymous with intent to retain, then intent to retain wouldn't be an element of the crime.
Clearly... possessing documents is one thing.... knowingly, purposefully intending to retain them is another.
One is not proof of the other.
I'd stick to flipping burgers if I were you.
None of your blathering proves INTENT to retain. And that is a key element of the crime. He brought them to his home and forgot to return them. You cannot disprove that. Again... stick to the fry-o-lator. You don't know **** from fat meat about the law.Buffalo » 24 Jan 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ You cannot change the fact that documents were found that were taken during Biden’s years in the Senate. Their excuses of transparency disappeared when those older documents were found that have been in braindead's possession for years. No intent has now been exposed as a LIE!!!
As little sense as that made before this latest news, it’s now been shown to be an obvious lie. Having Senate-era documents means that braindead biden had to have actively taken them, known about them, and kept them. There is no other way they could have ended up at his home in Wilmington, DE.
Whar value did all those documents represent to braindead biden and his crackhead, influence peddling son?
The latest revelation of classified documents a he Delaware home clearly indicts their intent to keep them. Although having intent isn’t even required for it to be a crime. Further, braindead biden has been lying his *** off when he says that he didn’t know about the documents, nor what they contain!!!
But you keep making a fool of your pathetic liberal self trying to defend this corrupt, perverted ****!!!
maineman » 24 Jan 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ None of your blathering proves INTENT to retain. And that is a key element of the crime. He brought them to his home and forgot to return them. You cannot disprove that. Again... stick to the fry-o-lator. You don't know **** from fat meat about the law.
.Did you even read your link ? There is so much hack spin in there it is pathetic !ScottMon » 24 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I can't prove it either way, But I can prove that Trump pretty much did whatever Putin wanted him to do.
37 times Trump was soft on Russia | CNN Politics
That's because Biden requested that the DOJ come and get all of it, and Trump fought it and denied it right out of the gate.Warcok » 18 Jan 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ DOJ lawyers were the only ones allowed in to gather up all the top secret nuclear codes.
Gargoyle Garland sends heavily armed FBI agents with AK-47's to raid President Trump's home, but sends a team of lawyers heavily armed with hammers and bleachbit to raid Xiden's house.![]()