Liberal Forum

maineman » 24 Jan 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 9:30 am

If mere possession were synonymous with intent to retain, then intent to retain wouldn't be an element of the crime.

Clearly... possessing documents is one thing.... knowingly, purposefully intending to retain them is another.

One is not proof of the other.

I'd stick to flipping burgers if I were you.

great one sided narrative. To bad it is just a redial projection away from a kinetic universal constant of objects self evidentaly occupying space in series parallel displacement now exactly as existed or currently existing.

FJB » 24 Jan 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 9:59 am

He "forgot"???? Oh my.

who knows?

Tthe point being, INTENT TO RETAIN, which is an element of the crime, is nearly impossible to prove without overwhelming corroborating evidence in this case

"I fully MEANT to return the documents.  I knew that I SHOULD return the documents.  I did not INTEND to retain the documents.  I just didn't get around to returning them, that's all... and then returning them just slipped off the radar, so to speak".  If Joe WERE to claim that - and I am not saying that he has or that he would - but if he DID, who could prove otherwise?  Not you, that's for sure.

maineman » 24 Jan 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 1:06 pm

who knows?

Tthe point being, INTENT TO RETAIN, which is an element of the crime, is nearly impossible to prove without overwhelming corroborating evidence in this case

"I fully MEANT to return the documents.  I knew that I SHOULD return the documents.  I did not INTEND to retain the documents.  I just didn't get around to returning them, that's all... and then returning them just slipped off the radar, so to speak".  If Joe WERE to claim that - and I am not saying that he has or that he would - but if he DID, who could prove otherwise?  Not you, that's for sure.

The fact remains he did the same thing as Trump.

FJB » 24 Jan 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 1:18 pm

The fact remains he did the same thing as Trump.

false.  He returned them as soon as he knew of their existence and never ignored a subpoena like the clown did.

oops.

Selaphobia » 24 Jan 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 3:31 pm

correct

incorrect.  He did the same thing as Pence, perhaps, but the clown's response was totally different.

Warcok » 18 Jan 2023, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023, 5:13 pm

You need me to lead you by the nose?

You need to stop making **** up.
 

Ike » wrote:

26 Jan 1970, 8:23 am

Warcok » 18 Jan 2023, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023, 11:37 am

DOJ lawyers were the only ones allowed in to gather up all the top secret nuclear codes.

Gargoyle Garland sends heavily armed FBI agents with AK-47's to raid President Trump's home, but sends a team of lawyers heavily armed with hammers and bleachbit to raid Xiden's house.   

That's because Biden requested that the DOJ come and get all of it, and Trump fought it and denied it right out of the gate.

Typical MAGA apples/oranges false equivalence.
 

 

And the silence from the MAGA was deafening.
 

IkeBana » 24 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm

And the silence from the MAGA was deafening.

 
 

FJB » 24 Jan 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 1:18 pm

The fact remains he did the same thing as Trump.

Did Biden claim that he magically DECLASSIFIED documents by just thinking about doing it?
No, he did not.
Did Biden IGNORE directives from the National Archives to return the documents they knew he had several times?
No, but that is what Trump did.

Did Biden claim that he personally OWNED the documents?
No, but that is what Trump did.

dumb dumb dumbduck, the everdumb ****.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 24 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm

Did Biden claim that he magically DECLASSIFIED documents by just thinking about doing it?
No, he did not.
Did Biden IGNORE directives from the National Archives to return the documents they knew he had several times?
No, but that is what Trump did.

Did Biden claim that he personally OWNED the documents?
No, but that is what Trump did.

dumb dumb dumbduck, the everdumb ****.

President Trump had the authority to declassify whatever the **** he wanted because he was president.

Senator Pedal Peter didn't. Senator Pedo Peter literally stole classified documents and snuck them out of a SCIF and into his house 

Raiding President Trump's home with 50 heavily armed FBI SWAT soldiers armed with AK-47's, assaulting the staff, forcing them to turn the surveillance cameras off and sniffing the first ladies panties is nothing more than a political attack on President Trump and a violation of his civil rights.

And all of that for what? Because he had a dispute with the archives director over some napkins and love letters.     

**** simp      
 

MackTheFinger » 24 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 10:13 am

.Did you even read your link ?  There is so much hack spin in there it is pathetic ! 

ScottMon link:

Trump invited Russia to 2020 G7 summit 

...that he also wanted to extend invitations to Russia...

Trump balked at sanctions for Skripal poisoning

Trump privately complained about US sanctions intended to punish Russia after one of its ex-spies was poisoned in the United Kingdom, according to Trump’s former national security adviser John Bolton.  Putin,” according to Bolton’s memoir.

U.S imposes new sanctions on Russia over Skripal poisoning

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1US1OC

You skipped around the other 36 points, skippy.
 

Nostradamus'omh » 24 Jan 2023, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 11:06 am

 To bad it is just a redial projection away from a kinetic universal constant of objects

What are the Russians saying about all of this ?
.
. 
 
 

Buffalo » 24 Jan 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 9:49 am

You cannot change the fact that documents were found that were taken during Biden’s years in the Senate.  Their excuses of transparency disappeared when those older documents were found that have been in braindead's possession for years. No intent has now been exposed as a LIE!!!

As little sense as that made before this latest news, it’s now been shown to be an obvious lie. Having Senate-era documents means that braindead biden had to have actively taken them, known about them, and kept them. There is no other way they could have ended up at his home in Wilmington, DE.

Whar value did all those documents represent to braindead biden and his crackhead, influence peddling son?

The latest revelation of classified documents a he Delaware home  clearly indicts their intent to keep them.   Although having intent isn’t even required for it to be a crime. Further, braindead biden has been lying his *** off when he says that he didn’t know about the documents, nor what they contain!!!

But you keep making a fool of your pathetic liberal self trying to defend this corrupt, perverted  ****!!!

Your hatred of Biden blinds you to the fact that Biden won't face any charges.  Nor will his home be raided because he gave the DOJ permission to check his house.
 

ScottMon » 24 Jan 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 5:51 pm

You skipped around the other 36 points, skippy.

That because about 30 of them were so funny...I couldn't stop laughing !
 

Xavier_Onassis » 24 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm

Did Biden claim that he magically DECLASSIFIED documents by just thinking about doing it?
No, he did not.
Did Biden IGNORE directives from the National Archives to return the documents they knew he had several times?
No, but that is what Trump did.

Did Biden claim that he personally OWNED the documents?
No, but that is what Trump did.

dumb dumb dumbduck, the everdumb ****.

Biden had classified docs from when he was Senator. He did worse 
 

MackTheFinger » 24 Jan 2023, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 6:00 pm

That because about 30 of them were so funny...I couldn't stop laughing !

So I take it that you couldn't prove them wrong?  

ScottMon » 24 Jan 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:36 pm

So I take it that you couldn't prove them wrong?

.
.OK...here is another BUT would admit CNN was wrong about my above post ?

At a news conference in July 2016, he even asked Russia to hack more, saying, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,”

OMB was being sarcastic BUT admits it was happening !  If he really wanted Russia to find those emails do you really believe he would ask in a public forum on a platform ?  I mean after all he is a KGB agent he could just call Puke'n and ask him.

"Of course I was being sarcastic," the Republican presidential nominee said on Fox News' "Fox & Friends" this morning. "And frankly, they don't even know if it's Russia, if it's China, if it's someone else. Who knows who it is?"
 
 

OK...here is another BUT would you admit CNN was wrong about my above post ?

.
Have you admitted it yet ?

CNN your link: Trump was open to lifting Russian sanctions

CNN my link: He told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published Friday evening that he MIGHT do away with them if Russia helps the US battle terrorists or with other goals important to the US

.https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/13/politics ... index.html
 
 

MackTheFinger » 24 Jan 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 5:52 pm

What are the Russians saying about all of this ?
.
. 
 
 

great diversion, but like most realities opposing one another with the attitude theirs is better than everyone else's, it won't be the same thing this country says.
What is the rule of magnetism? same attitudes repel, opposites attract conflicting interpretations of which side is best at controlling outcomes next rotation of the planet evolving never leaves what exists same details again.

where in that evolving your body does, have you lost all sense of proportion in real time adapting in the moment here your body has never stayed same form since added a fertilized cell? Society trains brains to become mindful citizens after birth. Brain was the original nucleus of one's fertilized cell.

contextual minds ignore ancestral position for a position of authority in reality above being equally alive in series parallel displacement now. Alternate realities are simple separate ideologies, parallel universes are ancestral lineages simultaneously evolving as spontaneously ancestrally here in plain sight of adapting to the moment all the time one gets being alive here now.

Power of suggestion rules choices forward. theories and theologies implant reasonable doubt now has always been eternity, Not a society serving humanities excepts now is eternity factually. Where is the core of corruption every generation added throughout history?

This moment here. Your choices never discovered how actual life sustains numbers in real time, yet your brain navigates living never staying same form again. Your mind demands human rights to always believe eternity is anywhere else but the moment here.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

ScottMon » 24 Jan 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2023, 8:36 pm

So I take it that you couldn't prove them wrong?  

what is different between inaccurate all the time and never completely wrong once? A fool believes reality is larger than time existing here now.