Your sources are Right wing political organizations, not medical organizations, definitely not science.freeman » 20 Jan 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry jack, I'm afraid I wasn't very clear. What I meant was that specific, singular, outcome, as if it were the only bad outcome. So by "bad outcome" I meant more broadly any one of hundreds to thousands of potential bad outcomes.
Pfizer trials - 1,291 different "adverse events of special interest"
mRNA vaxx - functional reprogramming of innate immune responses- favoring cancer
COVID Vaccines Linked to Shingles Reactivation
Up until Big Pharma's most recent criminal acts, it was the drug maker's responsibility to prove that their new product was not the cause - not the responsibility of the injured or the family of the dead to prove that the clot shot is the cause. But the evidence is becoming overwhelming.
So jack, what do you suppose caused a 4 times what would be expected from a once in 200 year event increase in mortality, in working age people, beginning in the year of clot shot rollout?
Life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
Even though heart related mortality was higher in Pfizer's own trials, it took them and their U.S. government bi*ch to admit that the vaccine is responsible for myocarditis. It took overwhelming evidence to do so. And as one cardiologist put it: "Suggesting myocarditis to be mild is like saying someone can be partially pregnant." It always results in permanent damage.
Myocarditis numbers before COVID were 4 per million, post jab 25,000 per million
Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis in Children May Have 50% Fatality Rate in Five Years
Perhaps the only reason you still believe that is you fell Big Pharma's bi*ch the CDC labeling vaccine deaths as unvaxxed COVID deaths (deaths within 2 weeks after second jab as of "unvaxxed").
The Vaccine Death Report
NSW: 798 COVID deaths in the last 8 weeks, all but 2 were vaccinated
Like Indiana Life Insurance Company?A
Referring to Big Pharma's government bureaucrats that broke your mind and sacrificed 1.1 million Americans on the alter of Big Pharma's and their bi*ches profit?, not medical organizations,
Save me speculating then! Let's revisit this little grade school math problem I presented previously regarding THE SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment:definitely not science.
So given what you believe, don't speculate on what I believe - it's not "Big Pharma". It is science.
No., she can't. She is like Veghead and VG, she only skims 5 words. Nothing more.
I didn't attack your sources - that is a regular Righty device; I said what they are. None are medical science sources. The rest of that reply is an attempt to change the subject. Can't blame you.freeman » 20 Jan 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Like Indiana Life Insurance Company?A
Attacking messengers is always a sign of desperation, jack.
Referring to Big Pharma's government bureaucrats that broke your mind and sacrificed 1.1 million Americans on the alter of Big Pharma's and their bi*ches profit?
Save me speculating then! Let's revisit this little grade school math problem I presented previously regarding THE SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment:
MyFreeDoctor.com has treated 150,000 COVID patients and only lost 4. So jack, theoretically, if all Americans could have received that level of care from the beginning of the "pandemic", what would the total U.S. casualties from the pandemic have been instead of 1.1 million?
Unlike yourself I will reply to all of your post in detail as I have in the past, but wanted you to stop ignoring the question I asked twice regarding the science of evidenced based COVID treatment.jack » 20 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't attack your sources - that is a regular Righty device; I said what they are. None are medical science sources. The rest of that reply is an attempt to change the subject. Can't blame you.
What individual doctors "report" regarding treatment they performed doesn't constitute a scientific finding of any kind on the efficacy of Covid vaccinations. It does constitute a typical political argument on a question of medical science, however, so you are on good Right wing ground.freeman » 20 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Unlike yourself I will reply to all of your post in detail as I have in the past, but wanted you to stop ignoring the question I asked twice regarding the science of evidenced based COVID treatment.
Or are you going to confirm that you are clueless regarding that science or even as to what science is?
Perhaps the grade school math was the problem, so let me offer a couple of even simpler problems.
On March 23rd of 2020 Dr. Zev Zelenko reported curing 500 elderly and high-risk patients with 0 deaths, 0 hospitalizations and 0 intubations.
If from the beginning of the pandemic, if everyone who got COVID had been treated with that level of care, what would the theoretical total of COVID deaths in the U.S. have been instead of 1.1 million?
That would be the same answer as for Dr. Brian Tyson who in mid-2020 reported having cured 1900 patients with 0 deaths and 1 hospitalization of 4 days.
You were too blind to see that what it did was demonstrate the abject ignorance, of anyone believing there was a need a vaccine, for a disease that had been proven to be so easily treatable ever since March of 2020!jack » 20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ What individual doctors "report" regarding treatment they performed doesn't constitute a scientific finding of any kind on the efficacy of Covid vaccinations. It does constitute a typical political argument on a question of medical science, however, so you are on good Right wing ground.
Take care.
You're the one guided by blind "beliefs" in your Faucian religious cult.jack » 20 Jan 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Your sources are Right wing political organizations, not medical organizations, definitely not science.
So given what you believe, don't speculate on what I believe - it's not "Big Pharma". It is science. Your beliefs, on the other hand, such as half the nation's children dying in five years, are from a fountain of conspiracies and paranoia.
Did you hear about- I think it was Connecticut..Selaphobia » 20 Jan 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You hear about the guy that lost both arms and legs from the vaccine?
I know! and you know kids...Selaphobia » 20 Jan 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah I heard. The person administering the jab should be charged with child endangerment or child abuse.
This **** has to stop NOW! Kids are dropping dead left and right from heart attacks and bleeding brains.
One kid, all her teeth fell out within 48 hours.
@Buck Naked How ya feelin ?
Since she wouldn't likely consider an inventor and patent holder of the mRNA technology platform a credible source, then perhaps it would just be another entry for a posthumous Darwin Award.Selaphobia » 20 Jan 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ @freeman
Unfortunately @jack is going to have to learn the hard way.
Maybe a booster, and then whammy "the big one"
Sophomoric drivel, employing personal insult to compensate for his string of lousy arguments. Put this guy in a university level seminar and he'd wonder what language was being spoken.freeman » 20 Jan 2023, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Since she wouldn't likely consider an inventor and patent holder of the mRNA technology platform a credible source, then perhaps it would just be another entry for a posthumous Darwin Award.
".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
You can see how she ran away from truth, like the Big Pharma's little bi*ch that she is.
Fauci's/Pfizer's little bi*ch must have missed this reply regarding her abject ignorance as to what science even is, jack:jack » 20 Jan 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Sophomoric drivel, employing personal insult to compensate for his string of lousy arguments. Put this guy in a university level seminar and he'd wonder what language was being spoken.
Selaphobia » 18 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Model who had both legs amputated leaves hospital in time for 21st birthday
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/model-who-h ... t-birthday
According to your own link, she had "Covid Myocarditis, etc., which means the Covid-19 caused the myocarditis, etc. Nowhere in the article is it suggested that any of this was caused by the vaccine, so your subject like is just another MAGA/Q-ANON cocksucker lie.Bridges, who was vaccinated, was then diagnosed with Covid Myocarditis, Rhabdomyolysis, mild pneumonia, Cyanotic, and had Acidosis, according to her family.
Same old BS from you science denying Pfizer's bi*ches. "Gee, it couldn't have been the clot shot!"IkeBana » 22 Jan 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ According to your own link, she had "Covid Myocarditis, etc., which means the Covid-19 caused the myocarditis, etc. Nowhere in the article is it suggested that any of this was caused by the vaccine, so your subject like is just another MAGA/Q-ANON cocksucker lie.
The mRNA Covid-19 vaccines are safe, actually more safe from unwanted side effects than most other vaccines.
If you thought that squeak was a definition of science you’re as useless an asshole about science as you are with pronouns. Find someone else to badger.freeman » 22 Jan 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Fauci's/Pfizer's little bi*ch must have missed this reply regarding her abject ignorance as to what science even is, jack:
viewtopic.php?p=2204972#p2204972
And ..... her admission.jack » 22 Jan 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ If you thought that squeak was a definition of science you’re as useless an asshole about science as you are with pronouns. Find someone else to badger.
If you want to be taken seriously you might try avoiding the use of foul language.IkeBana » 22 Jan 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ According to your own link, she had "Covid Myocarditis, etc., which means the Covid-19 caused the myocarditis, etc. Nowhere in the article is it suggested that any of this was caused by the vaccine, so your subject like is just another MAGA/Q-ANON cocksucker lie.
The mRNA Covid-19 vaccines are safe, actually more safe from unwanted side effects than most other vaccines.
If you were able to think you would see the futility in posting one helpful scientific-looking link after another when for every one that helps you there are two or ten or twenty out there that hurt you, the weight of opinion being pro vaccine. Having zero expertise yourself adds some extra dumbness. The juvenile "her" is wishful thinking.freeman » 22 Jan 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ And ..... her admission.
"Hit me with the clot shot
c'mon and hit me with the clot shot
fire away!"
I try to refer to all of Big Pharma's and Big Government's brainwashed little bi*ches in the female gender. How many of those "ten or twenty" links "hurt" me by refuting the science of early treatment for COVID-19?jack » 22 Jan 2023, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ If you were able to think you would see the futility in posting one helpful scientific-looking link after another when for every one that helps you there are two or ten or twenty out there that hurt you, the weight of opinion being pro vaccine. Having zero expertise yourself adds some extra dumbness. The juvenile "her" is wishful thinking.

