Liberal Forum

freeman » 23 Jan 2023, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 9:42 am

I try to refer to all of Big Pharma's and Big Government's brainwashed little bi*ches in the female gender. How many of those "ten or twenty" links "hurt" me by refuting the science of early treatment for COVID-19?
THE applied SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment

Because I don't personally have expertise in science or medicine, I do depend on renowned epidemiologists, virologists, microbiologists, pathologists, immunologists, vaccinologists, academics and particularly, talented, dedicated, front line treating physician/scientists, that have enjoyed 99+% success rates in early treatment of elderly and high-risk individuals ever since March of 2020.



 

Knowing next to nothing, you depend on specialists you like to hear.  I'm no different.

Makes for a great debate.



 

jack » 23 Jan 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2023, 10:19 am

Knowing next to nothing,

Difference between us being that I've been learning.

you depend on specialists you like to hear.

I depend on specialists that know the science.

I'm no different.

Makes for a great debate.

You are too broken-minded through mass formation psychosis from being brainwashed by the lefty Big Pharma "owned" legacy media and/or through censorship and the vaccine, vaccine, vaccine mantra, to realize there is no debate.

Dr. Brian Tyson and his team have treated over 20,000 COVID patients now, with 4 deaths and 6 hospitalizations, and 0 deaths in those that showed up for treatment before day 7 of illness.
https://twitter.com/btysonmd/status/1607599121594208256

Way back on March 23rd of 2020 Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported treating 500 patients with 0 deaths and 0 hospitalizations.

Now just like Dr. Zev Zelenko did, Tyson risk stratifies patients and doesn't treat the younger and healthier unless they become short of breath or their symptoms worsen. In other words they treated mostly elderly and higher risk patients with comorbidities. Yet both doctors have perfect records in patients that showed up on a timely basis.

So who's the expert? Dr. Death Fauci who never touched a COVID patient and squelched hydroxychloroquine to issue EUA to deadly patented $5,700 per 10-day course of treatment, comparatively worthless, Remdesivir? Or those dedicated front line treating physicians whose licenses were being threatened for prescribing $20 generic drug/nutraceutical protocols using a 65 year old medication that is one of the safest in the world, that is taken by millions of Americans every day of the year, decade after decade, in the same dosage that the Zelenko Protocol prescribes over just 7 days?

So what need does that suggest for anybody to have risked volunteering to be a lab rat for a criminal corporation's, investigational, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, innate immune response reprogramming, leaky, escape mutant training, gene therapy?

Particularly considering that there was 42.8% greater all-cause mortality in Pfizer's vaccine group than placebo group, while Pfizer conspired with the FDA to delay release of data for 55 years (but failed because of a brave judge) that just an initial dump revealed Pfizer listing 1,291 different "adverse events of special interest"
 
Vaccine RISK VS BENEFIT - Pragmatism (absurdly, "hesitant") VS blind obedience
Johns Hopkins Study Found Zero COVID Deaths Among 48,000 Healthy Kids

While all prior efforts at mRNA vaccines for SARS viruses in humans failed during the animal testing phase. The FDA even warned about it in this new round of experimental clot shots:
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?