Justthetruth » 20 Jan 2023, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You're wrong man. https://www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trump
Yeah and everytime we have a republican promising to cut deficits and debt they balloon the debt.Taipan » 20 Jan 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ The Libertarian = 1. 0 National Debt.
2. 0 yearly budget deficit.
3. "Everyone must learn to live.....within their means".
I am asking you to help me solve this problem.
What is your solution ?![]()
Ma'am,Justthetruth » 20 Jan 2023, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah and everytime we have a republican promising to cut deficits and debt they balloon the debt.
You just got to get woke on what the Republicans are pulling on you.
Taipan » 20 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Ma'am,
Pissing on my cowboy boot is not solving the problem.
I will ask again.
What is your solution to our National Debt ?
Justthetruth » 20 Jan 2023, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑ My at isn't working to get zo9s attention.
Something is messed up.
If you can't communicate using the language, I won't waste my time with you.Z09 » 20 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you watch the video?
Obama complained about $4 trillion debt...
And he added how much Maineman?
and you refuse to blame ANYTHING on him.Z09 » 20 Jan 2023, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Facts?
We have $32 trillion in debt and neither party much cares
Biden has the biggest budget in history...
Sorry you **** clown .
You can't blame everything on Trump
Notice when we prove him wrong all of the sudden he bails on it being only democrats and Obama.
No.jerrab » 20 Jan 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ my solution would be to have income taxed above 167.000 for social security, this would generate more money for social security, extend the the cap to 200,000 or so and maybe reduce the percentage after 200,000.
lift the cap!!!!
maineman » 20 Jan 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ If you can't communicate using the language, I won't waste my time with you.
i was referring to the amount that of income that can be taxed for social security. right now it is only 167,000; anything over that is not taxed for social security.Taipan » 20 Jan 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
Let's don't raise the cap.
Here is why.
We don't want to go further into debt.
That will hurt us financially.
Why is spending with what we got a bad idea?
Well you can't argue with my facts.Taipan » 20 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I can communicate.
@Z09 ??
She is my friend.
"You don't impress me much".
Shania.
https://youtu.be/BU-TeNPNJEQ
Oh MY!!!!Taipan » 20 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I can communicate.
@Z09 ??
She is my friend.
"You don't impress me much".
It's interesting... on the dot org site, @Z09 claims to be a woman.Justthetruth » 20 Jan 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Notice when we prove him wrong all of the sudden he bails on it being only democrats and Obama.
![]()
![]()
Never met her/him before.maineman » 20 Jan 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ It's interesting... on the dot org site, @Z09 claims to be a woman.
maineman » 20 Jan 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ It's interesting... on the dot org site, @Z09 claims to be a woman.