go **** yourself little boy... come back when you've got the mental capacity of something more than a stalk of asparagus.
maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ I say irrelevant because many people are still dreaming of the courts magically stepping in and declaring a 2020 redo. that ain't gonna happen.
I honestly can't begin to tell you how pleased I am to hear that.
maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ go **** yourself little boy... come back when you've got the mental capacity of something more than a stalk of asparagus.
maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ I honestly can't begin to tell you how pleased I am to hear that.
Kamala forgot more on her way to the crapper this morning than you have ever held in that inbred pea brain of yours, Cletis.RebelGator » 26 Jan 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Will you be pleased when the black whore with the IQ of a third grade Ugandan takes over after Sleepy Joe resigns?
proven? how is that. ducky? I don't lie, unless in situations like if a woman asks me if a dress makes her look fat.FJB » 26 Jan 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ coming from someone that is a proven pathological liar.... PRICELESS
You prove it daily little fellamaineman » 26 Jan 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ proven? how is that. ducky? I don't lie, unless in situations like if a woman asks me if a dress makes her look fat.
Seriously... show us this proof you claim to have. I dare you.
so.... no real proof any any lies.... just wolf tickets?
What site?maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ so.... no real proof any any lies.... just wolf tickets?
that's all ya got?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
you're an even bigger chump on here than you are on the other site.
Oh, you know...the site where you first developed that pathological liar schtick.
He seems.....even dumber.maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ so.... no real proof any any lies.... just wolf tickets?
that's all ya got?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
you're an even bigger chump on here than you are on the other site.
Yes, of course.maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ did any of the revised rules - which were revised in order to cope with a national election in the midst of a deadly global pandemic - apply to only democrats and not republicans? Y/N?
tell me one revised election procedure that even used the names of parties.
The couch.maineman » 28 Jan 2023, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ tell me one revised election procedure that even used the names of parties.
just one
^^^ white flag.
I haven't found a Socialist/Marxist that ever had a clue. Of any kind.
you have no election rule change that was made prior to the 2020 election that was altered for the purpose of helping one party over the other.
You just acknowledged there were rule changes, but now you change your tune. Go back to sleep, election denier.maineman » 28 Jan 2023, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ you have no election rule change that was made prior to the 2020 election that was altered for the purpose of helping one party over the other.
fact.
If you did, you'd quit tap dancing and just link to one.
If you can't, don't waste any more of my time, please.