Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Jury finds four Oath Keepers guilty of seditious conspiracy
Jury finds four Oath Keepers guilty of seditious conspiracy
By slideman
23 Jan 2023 4:20 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
30 Jan 2023 6:59 pm
Of course there were rule changes... that were made to make voting safer during a deadly global pandemic. However...NO rule change was made to assist one party over the other and no rule change made even MENTIONS either political party. Both major parties were well aware of the rule changes well in advance and both had the opportunity to adjust their GOTV plan to deal with them.LincolnNebraska » 30 Jan 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You just acknowledged there were rule changes, but now you change your tune. Go back to sleep, election denier.
30 Jan 2023 7:01 pm
maineman » 30 Jan 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course there were rule changes... that were made to make voting safer during a deadly global pandemic. However...NO rule change was made to assist one party over the other and no rule change made even MENTIONS either political party. Both major parties were well aware of the rule changes well in advance and both had the opportunity to adjust their GOTV plan to deal with them.
Rule changes favored couch sloths.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
30 Jan 2023 9:15 pm
Your opinion.
What they did NOT favor was one political party over the other.
Both parties had to play by the same rule book.
One party got their **** together, one party sat on their asses and didn't bother to modify their GOTV effort to maximize turnout using the new rules.
Sucks to be them, I'd imagine.
1 Feb 2023 8:45 am
It favored one party over the over. They exaggerated Corona. They abused it. They ****.maineman » 30 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Your opinion.
What they did NOT favor was one political party over the other.
Both parties had to play by the same rule book.
One party got their **** together, one party sat on their asses and didn't bother to modify their GOTV effort to maximize turnout using the new rules.
Sucks to be them, I'd imagine.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
1 Feb 2023 8:47 am
**** it took 2 years for that? Wtfslideman » 23 Jan 2023, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I hope they put them under the jailhouse.
https://www.rawstory.com/oath-keepers-s ... cy-guilty/
https://apnews.com/article/ap-news-aler ... c4903237b7
1 Feb 2023 8:49 am
show me in the text of any election rule change where preferential treatment was given to one party over any other.LincolnNebraska » 01 Feb 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ It favored one party over the over. They exaggerated Corona. They abused it. They ****.
1 Feb 2023 8:51 am
maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ show me in the text of any election rule change where preferential treatment was given to one party over any other.
the fact they did in an election cycle is enough.
1 Feb 2023 8:51 am
maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ show me in the text of any election rule change where preferential treatment was given to one party over any other.
You just acknowledged it and now you're taking it back.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
1 Feb 2023 8:52 am
Main Stain @maineman is an election denier.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
1 Feb 2023 8:56 am
did what? there was no preferential treatment in those modified election rules. They were written in good faith bywell meaning officials dealing with a public health crisis of global proportions. The same rules applied to democrats and republicans alike. One party took them seriously, got busy and adjusted their GOTV efforts to conform to the new rules, the other party was lazy and did not.
1 Feb 2023 8:57 am
how bout states that broke from their state constitutionmaineman » 01 Feb 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ show me in the text of any election rule change where preferential treatment was given to one party over any other.
1 Feb 2023 8:57 am
maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ did what? there was no preferential treatment in those modified election rules. They were written in good faith bywell meaning officials dealing with a public health crisis of global proportions. The same rules applied to democrats and republicans alike. One party took them seriously, got busy and adjusted their GOTV efforts to conform to the new rules, the other party was lazy and did not.
no doubt about.
There was two separate rules.
The Republicans had the same rules as democrats.
1 Feb 2023 8:57 am
maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ did what? there was no preferential treatment in those modified election rules. They were written in good faith bywell meaning officials dealing with a public health crisis of global proportions. The same rules applied to democrats and republicans alike. One party took them seriously, got busy and adjusted their GOTV efforts to conform to the new rules, the other party was lazy and did not.
they were far from good faith. once they started in that mail in ballot, made it ripe for fraud.
1 Feb 2023 9:02 am
absolutely not. I can remember staying in bed with a bottle of tequila in Merida, Mexico on the day after the election in 2016. Heart broken... stunned... to be sure, but accepting it nonetheless. My fellow countrymen had, in fact, elected a clown to the nation's highest office. I was not a HUGE Hillary fan, I will admit, but, IMHO, she would have been infinitely better than the clown.
The election deniers are bozos like you who can't come to grips with the fact that the majority of American voters had had enough of the circus and wanted a competent, avuncular, no- drama leader at the helm. You loved the clown with such fervency that you couldn't imagine that everyone else wouldn't worship his as well.
Really sad.
1 Feb 2023 9:03 am
Like I said. You're an election denier.maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ absolutely not. I can remember staying in bed with a bottle of tequila in Merida, Mexico on the day after the election in 2016. Heart broken... stunned... to be sure, but accepting it nonetheless. My fellow countrymen had, in fact, elected a clown to the nation's highest office. I was not a HUGE Hillary fan, I will admit, but, IMHO, she would have been infinitely better than the clown.
The election deniers are bozos like you who can't come to grips with the fact that the majority of American voters had had enough of the circus and wanted a competent, avuncular, no- drama leader at the helm. You loved the clown with such fervency that you couldn't imagine that everyone else wouldn't worship his as well.
Really sad.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
1 Feb 2023 9:05 am
not one bit of fraud has EVER been proven beyond, quite literally, handfuls of erroneously cast ballots, mostly in states the clown won anyway.FJB » 01 Feb 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ they were far from good faith. once they started in that mail in ballot, made it ripe for fraud.
After all the recounts in all the states, I know of not one mailed ballot that can be shown to have been cast by someone other than a registered voter.
1 Feb 2023 9:06 am
it was gobbledygook the first time you said it and it still is.
You should realize that repeating idiocy does not make it intelligence.
Please try to take that into consideration before posting again.
thank you.
1 Feb 2023 9:07 am
maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ not one bit of fraud has EVER been proven beyond, quite literally, handfuls of erroneously cast ballots, mostly in states the clown won anyway.
After all the recounts in all the states, I know of not one mailed ballot that can be shown to have been cast by someone other than a registered voter.
sad you are so blind to the truth, typical liberal asswipe
1 Feb 2023 9:08 am
You being an election denier is still true.maineman » 01 Feb 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ it was gobbledygook the first time you said it and it still is.
You should realize that repeating idiocy does not make it intelligence.
Please try to take that into consideration before posting again.
thank you.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
1 Feb 2023 9:09 am
TRUTH? Show me some proof of your claims that would justify calling them TRUTH.
You can't.
Stick to cocksucking.
Who is online
In total there are 5341 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 5320 guests
Bots: LCC, coccocbot, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, okhttp, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot