AAAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!
Because that is something a Senator cannot get done unilaterally....Zeets2 » 25 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ What difference does it make?
How is it that a genius like you wasn't even aware of the fact, and now that you know it, the only alternative in your warped little mind is to try to shift the blame on to someone else?
Doesn't change the facts of what your boys did, does it?
You're sure spending a lot of time paddling upstream these days, aren't you?
And even as one Democrat after another and one left-wing MSN news network after another demands investigations into the Biden Crime Family, dopes like YOU are still grasping at straws trying to defend him!
Time to face the facts, ****!
You were an idiot for voting for them, and you're an even bigger idiot to still defend them while actually thinking they're innocent of the multiple felonies they've committed, up to and including the treason that is plain for everyone else to see!
He voted the same way you did......and you're a **** moron.
Beefondler,Beekeeper » 25 Jan 2023, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Your concession of DEFEAT is accepted. Funny how the second you get put in your highchair, all of you libretards start with this kind of crap. Funny to, how it has ZERO merit and absolutely no foundation in any facts of any kind!!
Run along now junior, before you get that little ARSE of your spanked red again!!
The monies for which he sold us are chump change to the actors who paid those monies.Beekeeper » 25 Jan 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Sold out the United States for 10% for the Big Guy! Which was MORE than MILLIONS of $$. As Senator, VP, and now as President.
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ If Barr is wrong, why do you insist that Grifty committed no crimes?
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did we "learn about" these?
Links, not ****, please...
Given the number of people with access to thos documents, there is a third possibility. Someone with decent chops and excellent access could have put it together (as in, "Go smoke somewhere else for a few hours, Hunter, and I'll use the skills from my associates in literature from Tallahassee Junior College to put together something that will make you look smart").Skans » 25 Jan 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ There can only be 2 possibilities:
- Hunter Biden was a CIA Asset and was being used by the CIA for a particular purpose in Ukraine, or
- Someone working for the State Department prepared the Email for Hunter Biden using classified information to get him a high paying job.
We all know what "proof" looks like to your kind.maineman » 25 Jan 2023, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I am saying there is no proof to support your opinion. Is that really that hard to comprehend?
He worships at the alter of a 2 tiered level of "proof" The one for Republicans which is such a low level of actual "proof" that in his world, you can convict anyone with it. You know, that ham sandwich is guilty because it exists.Cannonpointer » 26 Jan 2023, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑ We all know what "proof" looks like to your kind.
There was such excellent "proof" that the vax prevented infection and transmission that you were instructed we should lose our **** jobs if we did not take it. There was "proof" that Trump colluded with Russia. There is "proof" that men can become women - generally, through a declaration.
But there IS no "proof" that people had any reason other than competence to give a crack head loser with access to classified informationa and political muscle millions. Biden BRAGGED that he interfered in the internal affairs of Ukraine's government - but his bragging, on video, is not "proof."
You still believe there is "proof" that sea levels are rising - even though they simply are not rising. You think there is "proof" the glaciers are melting - even though they are not melting. You still believe there is "proof" that carbon is the primary driver of climate - even though it is a mere trace gas and is a tertiary driver after water vapor and methane and even volcanic particulates.
Your politics are "proof" against your intellect. "Proof" is whatever furthers your masters' narratives and WANT of "proof" is whatever threatens those narratives.
Beekeeper » 26 Jan 2023, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ He worships at the alter of a 2 tiered level of "proof" The one for Republicans which is such a low level of actual "proof" that in his world, you can convict anyone with it. You know, that ham sandwich is guilty because it exists.
Then there is the level of "proof" for Democrats. That level requires 412 different forms of evidence that all unquestionably says "YOU did it" and that you "meant to harm" when you did do it. And even then, it becomes questionable in his mind since the tainted jury being ALL Democrats which also subscribe to the same definitions of what is "proof" and what isn't, decide that there wasn't enough "irrefutable proof" that his boy committed a crime and should be in prison accordingly.
What they have isn't liberalism. What they have is nothing more than Authoritarianism cloaked as being "Liberal". There is nothing about them that demands LIBERTY, which is the foundational word for Liberal. Their roots lie in the multitude of authoritarian governance and control- the NAZIS, the FASCISTS, the COMMUNISTS. And they have no idea what actual Liberty looks or feels like. EVERYTHING has to be controlled or regulated by their leaders and anything less is mutiny or treason.
cool opinion.Cannonpointer » 26 Jan 2023, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑ We all know what "proof" looks like to your kind.
There was such excellent "proof" that the vax prevented infection and transmission that you were instructed we should lose our **** jobs if we did not take it. There was "proof" that Trump colluded with Russia. There is "proof" that men can become women - generally, through a declaration.
But there IS no "proof" that people had any reason other than competence to give a crack head loser with access to classified informationa and political muscle millions. Biden BRAGGED that he interfered in the internal affairs of Ukraine's government - but his bragging, on video, is not "proof."
You still believe there is "proof" that sea levels are rising - even though they simply are not rising. You think there is "proof" the glaciers are melting - even though they are not melting. You still believe there is "proof" that carbon is the primary driver of climate - even though it is a mere trace gas and is a tertiary driver after water vapor and methane and even volcanic particulates.
Your politics are "proof" against your intellect. "Proof" is whatever furthers your masters' narratives and WANT of "proof" is whatever threatens those narratives.
1. vaccine mandates have been around for more than two centuries. Get used to it.Cannonpointer » 26 Jan 2023, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑ We all know what "proof" looks like to your kind.
There was such excellent "proof" that the vax prevented infection and transmission that you were instructed we should lose our **** jobs if we did not take it. There was "proof" that Trump colluded with Russia. There is "proof" that men can become women - generally, through a declaration.
But there IS no "proof" that people had any reason other than competence to give a crack head loser with access to classified informationa and political muscle millions. Biden BRAGGED that he interfered in the internal affairs of Ukraine's government - but his bragging, on video, is not "proof."
You still believe there is "proof" that sea levels are rising - even though they simply are not rising. You think there is "proof" the glaciers are melting - even though they are not melting. You still believe there is "proof" that carbon is the primary driver of climate - even though it is a mere trace gas and is a tertiary driver after water vapor and methane and even volcanic particulates.
Your politics are "proof" against your intellect. "Proof" is whatever furthers your masters' narratives and WANT of "proof" is whatever threatens those narratives.
LOL - Tallahassee Junior College. WHERE EVEN THE LOSERSCannonpointer » 26 Jan 2023, 1:17 am » wrote: ↑ Given the number of people with access to thos documents, there is a third possibility. Someone with decent chops and excellent access could have put it together (as in, "Go smoke somewhere else for a few hours, Hunter, and I'll use the skills from my associates in literature from Tallahassee Junior College to put together something that will make you look smart").

Here's all the proof you need, fool!maineman » 26 Jan 2023, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ cool opinion.
proof of nothing, but cool, nonetheless!
bravo zulu!!!
DOUBLE STANDARD! Five Americans Obama Jailed For Mishandling Classified Information
by Jeff Dunetz | Jul 5, 2016
https://lidblog.com/double-standard-fiv ... formation/
Former CIA Agent Arrested for Mishandling Classified Information
National Review By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY January 17, 2018
On Tuesday, the Justice Department announced the arrest of a former CIA officer on a felony charge of unlawfully retaining classified information. Jerry Chun Shing Lee (a/k/a “Zhen Cheng Li”) is charged in a complaint with one count of unlawfully retaining classified information, a felony carrying a potential ten-year prison sentence.
Now, isn't it a FACT that the entries found on Hunter's laptop contained CLASSIFIED INFORMATION? Whether he copied it directly from the classified documents or not, POSSESSING THAT INFO IS A CRIME, whether he was caught with the actual document or not! And the question needs to be put to him under oath, "WHERE DID YOU GET THAT INFORMATION?".2014 Crackhead Hunter Biden Email Believed To Contain ‘Classified’ Information
USSA News January 26, 2023 by Constitutional Nobody
Now, after classified documents were discovered in a personal garage that both Hunter and his father had access to, a 2014 email found on the younger Biden’s “laptop from Hell” is being given a sinister, new perspective.
A Crackhead Hunter Biden email about Ukraine from 2014 looks ‘suspiciously’ like it could have come from classified information, a leading Republican Party senator has claimed.
Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said the April 12, 2014 message to one of the first son’s business partners resembles documents that the Inept State Department gives members of the Senate when they travel overseas.