((((((THEY ARE ALREADY IN 'THE WRONG HAND$'))))MackTheFinger » 25 Jan 2023, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I think we should send aid to Ukraine but not with advance weaponry !
We don't want them falling into the wrong hands.
peepee » 27 Jan 2023, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ ...decent, knowledgeable, peaceful, non-murderers/non-thieves/other non-scumf@cks, will remind you stoooooooooooooooooopid f@cking republican and democrat-puppet-sucking @ssholes (and monetary ignoramuses) that (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((MOST/MANY AMERICANS CAN'T STAND YOUR STOOOOOOOOPID F@CK IDEAS...WHAT DO YOU THINK DECENT FOREIGNERS THINK ABOUT YOU STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID F@CKS----FOREIGNERS TO THEM--- F@CKING UP THEIR COUNTRY?....WHAT WOULD YOU STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID F@CKS DO WERE 'THE FOE ON THE OTHER $HOOT' ?!?)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
...you f@cking miserableops: fools
![]()
... (and monetary
ops: ignoramuses)
...and you brain-laundered, republicrat-level, puppet-$ucking monetary ignoramuses are surely some beastly $hit-heads...
righteous » 26 Jan 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ NATO MUST DIE. NEW WORLD ORDER CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION. MURDERS INNOCENT CIVILIANS
THE AMERICAN MIC RUN BY THE BIDEN CRIME ORGANIZATION MUST DIE.
RUSSIA MUST DEFEAT HEGEMONY AND DEFEAT THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
HAVE ANOTHER DRINK, LEFTWING COMMUNIST
I only want to invade Mexico to the extent of establishing a 40 mile wide no-go or neutral zone. I would have no problem with Mexicans if they kept themselves and their drugs inside of Mexico. I do not want to destroy Mexico nor its inhabitants.Taipan » 26 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ "No-go" zone......40mi. ??
Damn.
That is good thinking.
I like that.
OK.
I can work with that.
Invasion of Mexico??
What the hell are you smoking ??
They are nice, brown Christians.
They are not your enemy.![]()
https://youtu.be/NE3mHhpGV2A
peepee » 27 Jan 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ ...and you brain-laundered, republicrat-level, puppet-$ucking monetary ignoramuses are surely some beastly $hit-heads...
I did not mess with your posts. I cannot mess with your posts. All I can do is create my own posts, and I have pretty good latitude on how I choose to do that.Majik » 26 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ So, Epic I proved you were lying .....about **** with posts....
Skans » 27 Jan 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ I only want to invade Mexico to the extent of establishing a 40 mile wide no-go or neutral zone. I would have no problem with Mexicans if they kept themselves and their drugs inside of Mexico. I do not want to destroy Mexico nor its inhabitants.
...i have a porcupine hanging around...you're welcome to the quill of a lifetime, you republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus...Taipan » 27 Jan 2023, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ Sooooo..........does that mean that I cannot come over
to your house tomorrow night and **** you sister ?
...stoooooooooooopid f@ck ^^^^ wanna 'prohibition harder'... stoooooooooopid f@ck....Skans » 27 Jan 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ I would have no problem with Mexicans if they kept themselves and their drugs inside of Mexico. I do not want to destroy Mexico nor its inhabitants.
Do you really? SHOOT IT!peepee » 27 Jan 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ ...i have a porcupine hanging around...you're welcome to the quill of a lifetime, you republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus...
Prohibition? I don't want that. What I want is a drug to be designed which is more powerful then Fentanyl. One which gets a person higher quicker. One from which there is no possible escape from its addiction. One which is easily available, but would only be appealing to drug addicts. One which will eradicate the user within 1 week of an initial dose.peepee » 27 Jan 2023, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ ...stoooooooooooopid f@ck ^^^^ wanna 'prohibition harder'... stoooooooooopid f@ck....
peepee » 27 Jan 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ ...i have a porcupine hanging around...you're welcome to the quill of a lifetime, you republican-radio-level monetary ignoramus...
people in germany will be more nervous about getting into a war with russia than people in the US. and that is understandablerighteous » 26 Jan 2023, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ READ AND LEARN, DRUNKEN FOOL
Berlin's Decision to Send Leopard 2s to Ukraine 'Historically Wrong': German MP (sputniknews.com)
THE MAJORITY OF THE GERMAN POPULATION DOES NOT WANT TANKS SENT TO UKRAINE.
“It’s the interest of an elite, of neocons in the United States, who are having the position that Europe is like Latin America for the United States in the '70s, and a continent where you can do what you please. And that's really a problem,” the German lawmaker noted.
“In the long term or in the medium term, they [the Leopard 2s] will not change anything on the ground in Ukraine, because Russia will react,” she stressed, calling for a diplomatic solution to the Ukrainian conflict to avoid more “senseless killings.”
Russia Rolls Out Combat Robot to Destroy Leopard 2, Abrams Tanks Sent to Ukraine (sputniknews.com)
"For example, as soon as deliveries of the Abrams and Leopard tanks to the Ukrainian troops begin, the Marker will be fitted with an appropriate electronic image to detect and destroy the US and German tanks with anti-tank guided missiles,” Rogozin said.
American Abrams tanks vulnerable even to Soviet-era weapons, says expert - Military & Defense - TASSThe American tank almost has no chances, if it engages in a duel with Russian tanks, the expert said."If an Abrams emerges at a long distance, a T-72 or a T-90 crew will fire an anti-tank missile and we can say that the Abrams will even have no chance to fire a shot as its range of fire won’t allow it to do that," he explained.
American M1 Abrams tanks that Washington has decided to hand over to Kiev as military aid have weaknesses that allowed wiping them out with Soviet weapons, including T-55 tanks, during the conflict in Iraq, armor expert, Candidate of Military Sciences, retired Colonel Sergey Suvorov told TASS on Thursday. The tank turret was pierced by a 100mm armor-piercing blunt nose projectile fired by a T-55 tank. Instances are also known when the American tank was destroyed by the first Soviet modifications of T-72 tanks firing old shells "that were withdrawn from operational use even before the Abrams concept was devised," Suvorov said.The expert also pointed to the instances when Abrams tanks were wiped out by RPG-7 anti-tank grenade launchers.
jerrab » 27 Jan 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ people in germany will be more nervous about getting into a war with russia than people in the US. and that is understandable
ECO-FRIENDLY TANKXavier_Onassis » 25 Jan 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Beats the hell out of me why this country would have a jet turbine engine in a tank.
This sounds very expensive and rather silly.
Taipan » 27 Jan 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
I was not looking for war.
Just the opposite.
I was seeking to intimidate.
Through masculine dominance of the battlefield.
So that the Russian Army would back off & seek peace.
That......is the end goal.
Jesus Christ........is the Prince of Peace.
I am a follower.............of Jesus Christ.![]()
https://youtu.be/exidLnAtOJc
also russia sees US sending weapons to fight russia as provocation.Taipan » 27 Jan 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
I was not looking for war.
Just the opposite.
I was seeking to intimidate.
Through masculine dominance of the battlefield.
So that the Russian Army would back off & seek peace.
That......is the end goal.
Jesus Christ........is the Prince of Peace.
I am a follower.............of Jesus Christ.![]()
https://youtu.be/exidLnAtOJc
Then the Russians are bigger pussies than Joe Biden's Administration. They haven't done **** about it!!!jerrab » 27 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ also russia sees US sending weapons to fight russia as provocation.