Finally, Xavier is seeing the light.
Source? That's ground zero.....
NO ONE involved in a riot is"my people, you drooling imbecile.roadkill » 26 Jan 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ 11 people died...the only people who died or were injured with Kyle were the perps. If Kyle had been at the first attack it's possible no one would have died...except the perp. BTW Mr. X...Kyle was NOT the perp...your people were and one of them had a gun.
You pegged again Mr. X...
Xavier_Onassis » 26 Jan 2023, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ NO ONE involved in a riot is"my people, you drooling imbecile.
I was just saying, of course, that Brandon Tsai was MORE of a hero and a more useful person than ******* Kyle Rittenhouse, who should have stayed home, and served no useful purpose by being in Kenosha.
https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... 445c44.mp4Xavier_Onassis » 26 Jan 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Being as Brandon Tsay actually saw the 72 years old shooter and none of you wimps did, you actually cannot say that you have judged Tsay's evaluation of the circumstances adequately.
He seems to have seem an opportunity to disarm the shooter and he did it.
None of you drooling fascists were there and nothing you say is worth diddly-squat, as ever.
The world is not full of Kyle Rittenhouses, dick sucker. If it WERE, the proper meme would be:Xavier_Onassis » 26 Jan 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Sometimes the way to deal with a bad guy with a gun does not require a gun.
But he HAD a gun, dick sucker.
The desperate need to present outliers as evidence for their positions simply proves how **** the goons' positions are.neueregel » 26 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrestling a guy with a gun might be the dumbest advice I've ever heard.
Hey, it's fantastic that a guy with VERY short odds and even LESS options was able to leverage adrenalin into a ticket to stay in the game. Good on the lucky bastard.Huey » 26 Jan 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, good luck with that...let me know how it turns out for ya.
What the dude had was an angel in his corner or the devil's own luck. Unarmed men don't fare well against people with guns, generally.nuckinfutz » 26 Jan 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, you don't tsay!
The dude had more balls than you will ever have!![]()
![]()
![]()
He looks asian, so he definitely knows karate.Vegas » 26 Jan 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The stupidity of lefties is insufferable. It is extremely rare that anyone would know how to do this. Good for him, ok...but this is an anomaly. I would like to see a 100-pound woman or an elderly person try it. Even a strong healthy person would probably get shot along with the others if they tried.
God man. It's impossible for the left to understand how stupid they are, due to the reason that they are stupid.
Still.Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2023, 4:37 am » wrote: ↑ But he HAD a gun, dick sucker.
And WITH a gun, he is a thug stopping machine.
No, jaggov, Tsay DID need one. But he was forced to make do without one - and got damned lucky.Squatchman » 27 Jan 2023, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Still.
Tsay didn't need one.
He stopped an actual threat.
Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2023, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ No, jaggov, Tsay DID need one. But he was forced to make do without one - and got damned lucky.
If you were not a fake gun owner, you would understand that Tsay's outcome was extremely unlikely and extremely lucky - bording on a miracle.
A real gun owner would NEVER impute that it is wise to expect to defend oneself against an armed person witht heir hands.
You're a total fraud, little girl.
Center mass save us a lot of trouble next timeXavier_Onassis » 26 Jan 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Sometimes the way to deal with a bad guy with a gun does not require a gun.