You've tried to pester me with those slurs.
as a repressed strange man once said, "We'll buy that for a dollar, fruity"Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You've tried to pester me with those slurs.
It would be obvious to any literate person that it doesn't bother me. With a hundred women under my belt and only two penises, my heterosexuality is gold star affirmed.
do you agree with every single plank of the party you vote for, "fruity"?Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ You do on the first Teusday of every other November, fruitcake.
Close enough for government work, groomer.
First, your implicit pretense that the protection of children from perverts and the protection of women from predators is just another issue that should not be a deal breaker simply proves I am correct about you. You're a groomer - an accomplice, at minimum.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ do you agree with every single plank of the party you vote for, "fruity"?
Y/N?
Heh heh heh. Make up your mind. Am I a professed dick sucker, or repressed, fruitcake?maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ as a repressed strange man once said, "We'll buy that for a dollar, fruity"
I think you are a professed dick sucker who represses his homosexuality by claiming that he is 98% NOT queer. You admitted to sucking a dick... and if you really found it repulsive, you wouldn't have gone back for a second try. If someone had a bowl full of rabbit turds at their Super Bowl buffet and they were mislabeled as "cocoa drops", I might try one, and spit it out. I certainly wouldn't go back and try a second rabbit turd if I didn't think they were a bit tasty. You like cock.... you admittedly went back for a second helping.Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Heh heh heh. Make up your mind. Am I a professed dick sucker, or repressed, fruitcake?
Or do you wanna make the case that I can be both at the same time?![]()
![]()
I was not sleeping during civics class. I know that politics is a team sport. I know that majorities of members in legislative chambers are required to coalesce around proposals in order for those proposals to become laws. The two different "teams" on the playing field in our lifetime have been the democrats and the republicans. The last time a party other than those two held a significant number of supports in America was the Whig Party of the 1830's-50's. Since then, the two party D vs. R contest is the template under which all legislation is passed. To suggest that any ONE or TWO issues would become so preeminent that they would cause their supporters to possibly turn their backs on a myriad of other equally important issues is juvenile.Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ First, your implicit pretense that the protection of children from perverts and the protection of women from predators is just another issue that should not be a deal breaker simply proves I am correct about you. You're a groomer - an accomplice, at minimum.
Second, I don't vote for scumbags. I vote issues - which I first research. For example, I once voted against legal marijuana - even though I am pro choice across the board, up to and including mothers murdering their nascent offspring. The reason? It was being legalized in a sleazy manner, to head off NORML's initiative.
I vote for people sometimes, too. But they are rarely party creatures.
I never voted for trump. He was a bag of gas, and he showed his colors on the vax.
It's pretty clear you are a repressed rabbit turn connoisseur, fruitcake.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I think you are a professed dick sucker who represses his homosexuality by claiming that he is 98% NOT queer. You admitted to sucking a dick... and if you really found it repulsive, you wouldn't have gone back for a second try. If someone had a bowl full of rabbit turds at their Super Bowl buffet and they were mislabeled as "cocoa drops", I might try one, and spit it out. I certainly wouldn't go back and try a second rabbit turd if I didn't think they were a bit tasty. You like cock.... you admittedly went back for a second helping.
Shocking, fruity. Make up a story.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑It's certainly not a lifestyle I'd be interested in pursuing,
Well, I'm sorry that you're sorry, fruitcake. I did not mean to so fascinate you with my brilliant prose and incisive argumentation that you would become emotionally involved in mein kampf.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑but there's nothing sick about it... it's just not my cup of tea... you shouldn't repress your sexual orientation.... you should just embrace it. I would probably think more highly of you if you were HONEST about it even if your honestly led you to admit that you were a ***. I'm sorry you've got to deal with that level of constant turmoil and torment such repression must create.
methinks that @Cannonpointer , the self professed dick sucker, protesteth too much.
^^^ sez the guy who has admitted to sucking cocks (plural).Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty clear you are a repressed rabbit turn connoisseur, fruitcake.
Shocking, fruity. Make up a story.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Well, I'm sorry that you're sorry, fruitcake. I did not mean to so fascinate you with my brilliant prose and incisive argumentation that you would become emotionally involved in mein kampf.
But I get it. Your kind tend to be overly emo.
So what your saying is, a small handful of misogynists and groomers could never pull this **** off without a team of eager enablers. Got it, groomer. Continue.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I was not sleeping during civics class. I know that politics is a team sport. I know that majorities of members in legislative chambers are required to coalesce around proposals in order for those proposals to become laws.
Thank you for that admission, fruitcake - even though we all know you will treat abortion rights as a single issue. I know, I know - you're gonna lie about it.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑The two different "teams" on the playing field in our lifetime have been the democrats and the republicans. The last time a party other than those two held a significant number of supports in America was the Whig Party of the 1830's-50's. Since then, the two party D vs. R contest is the template under which all legislation is passed. To suggest that any ONE or TWO issues would become so preeminent that they would cause their supporters to possibly turn their backs on a myriad of other equally important issues is juvenile.
I've been asking maineboy that. He tosses homophobic insults like trailer trash.
Hey, just feeling bad that you feel so bad, emo groomer.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:47 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^ sez the guy who has admitted to sucking cocks (plural).
funny stuff!
I always look askance at people who start any argument with "so what you're[sic] saying is......" rather than simply address the words their adversary actually said.Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm » wrote: ↑ So what your saying is, a small handful of misogynists and groomers could never pull this **** off without a team of eager enablers. Got it, groomer. Continue.
Thank you for that admission, fruitcake - even though we all know you will treat abortion rights as a single issue. I know, I know - you're gonna lie about it.
The reason the two dishonest parties can work together in false opposition to the same end is that midwits like you willingly vote for evil in the retarded hope that it is "lesser" evil. If people voted their conscience, the parties would become regional and national players - no longer hegemons.
You excuse giving them hegemony with the argument that they have hegemony - and you're too stupid to see the irony. You veritably bleed unintentional irony, and you call others juvenile. You're a peace of work, fruitcake. Groom on.
feel bad? not me... my Celtics won... my house has three buyers in a bidding war, my dog is curled up in my lap, and my glass of tequila is staying nice and chilled. Hell...If I felt any better, I'd have to be bigger.Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, just feeling bad that you feel so bad, emo groomer.
I live in a net zero home in a uber-green subdivision. There are no trailers for MILES. Joan Benoit does run down my street on her daily jog however.Cannonpointer » 08 Feb 2023, 10:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I've been asking maineboy that. He tosses homophobic insults like trailer trash.
Does maine have trailers? It gets pretty cold up there.
So what you're saying is, you don't like being held accountable. You want to talk **** and never be called. Are you a chick?maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I always look askance at people who start any argument with "so what you're[sic] saying is......" rather than simply address the words their adversary actually said.
Whatever you say, fruity. Keep selling.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑ First... it is profoundly disingenuous for a guy who has admittedly sucked multiple dicks to refer to some self-identifying heterosexual as a "fruitcake". Spit the jism out of you mouth, and go gargle but, for chrissakes, don't call straight guys "fruitcakes" with boyjizz dripping off your chin, ya ****' homo.
Well, I had marked you as a liar and a misogynist. If you're lying, I was right. If you're telling the truth, I was right.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Secondly... abortion rights is WAY down the list of hills I care to plant a flag on or die on. If women today want to protect their own right to reproductive freedom, they should be the ones fighting for it... not elderly men who had vasectomies thirty years ago and whose wives are long post-menopausal, I have no dog in that fight, and would NEVER cast a vote based solely upon some candidate's stance on it.
Okay, fruitcake - you voting for women to lose their sex segregated spaces and for children to be groomed is sewper-manly.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑ And if "ifs and buts were candy and nuts, what a merry christmas we'd all have". When you figure out a way to shame people into voting the way you'd want them to, be sure and let me know. Until then.please pardon my derisive laughter. It slipped out unintentionally like an SBD fart. You really are that funny.
Okay, Sybil.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:08 pm » wrote: ↑feel bad? not me...maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sorry you've got to deal with that level of constant turmoil and torment such repression must create.
If she knew a weak, misogynistic piece of **** that wants to force women to compete with men lives in your house, she'd probably drop trou on your lawn, fruitcake.maineman » 08 Feb 2023, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I live in a net zero home in a uber-green subdivision. There are no trailers for MILES. Joan Benoit does run down my street on her daily jog however.