mainebitch thinks Mexicans are too stupid to use the internet.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ His first sentence, however, about Mexicans using the internet is certainly a Freudian slip of awesome specificity, don't you agree!
I NEVER mentioned anything sexual. You have admitted to using the internet to troll for Mexican seven year olds from your pervert's lair in Idaho YOU should go to jail.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You're the sick **** that changed the conversation from an economics tutor, to your perverted sexual desires.
And you want us to believe that Mexican seven year olds go surfing the web in search of Boise Idaho perverts like YOU?golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ mainebitch thinks Mexicans are too stupid to use the internet.
And once again, you're twisting simple English to fit your pedo fantasies.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑ And you want us to believe that Mexican seven year olds go surfing the web in search of Boise Idaho perverts like YOU?
Liar. Your IMMEDIATE post when I offered you a tutor was you expressing your delight sexual delight.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I NEVER mentioned anything sexual. You have admitted to using the internet to troll for Mexican seven year olds from your pervert's lair in Idaho YOU should go to jail.
that is a flat our lie, and we both know it.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Liar. Your IMMEDIATE post when I offered you a tutor was you expressing your delight sexual delight.
It was your immediate response. **** pedo.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ that is a flat our lie, and we both know it.
My only response to your offer of a Mexican second grader was revulsion.
You have YET to explain how you had access to seven year olds from Mexico until today, when you admitted you trolled for them on the internet.
You should go to jail, you disgusting pedophile!
liar.
You yourself just told someone else there is no proof without the .org site.
why are YOU making scurrilous claims that YOU know cannot be supported?golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You yourself just told someone else there is no proof without the .org site.
So why are you demanding proof you know can't be provided?
You really are a dishonest piece of ****, aren't you?
It's the truth, and you know it.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:45 pm » wrote: ↑ why are YOU making scurrilous claims that YOU know cannot be supported?
You really are a dishonest piece of pedophilic ****, aren't you?
Tell us again how you trolled for Mexican seven year olds on the internet, you sick ****!
I know nothing of the sort. I know that you are a lying pedophile who admits to trolling for young Mexican children on the internetgolfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:45 pm » wrote: ↑ It's the truth, and you know it.
But you have no honor, or you wouldn't have done it in the first place.
You're a sick ****.
That's amusing coming from the guy that literally moved to Mexico for 7 years... not so coincidently the Statute of Limitations.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I know nothing of the sort. I know that you are a lying pedophile who admits to trolling for young Mexican children on the internet
YOU NEED TO BE IN PRISON.
I only moved to Mexico for just shy of six years, and I repeatedly reentered the country and returned to Maine annually during that period.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑ That's amusing coming from the guy that literally moved to Mexico for 7 years... not so coincidently the Statute of Limitations.
^^ ******* can't count.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I only moved to Mexico for just shy of six years, and I repeatedly reentered the country and returned to Maine annually during that period.
Why must your continue this lying onslaught?
I moved to Mexico in November of 2011 and returned in October of 2017. And I returned to Maine, on my US passport, every year, at least once per year, during that entire time. If I had been under any sort of suspicion for any crime committed in Maine prior to 2011, I would have been snapped up the minute I reentered the country.
Prove your timeline.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I moved to Mexico in November of 2011 and returned in October of 2017. And I returned to Maine, on my US passport, every year, at least once per year, during that entire time. If I had been under any sort of suspicion for any crime committed in Maine prior to 2011, I would have been snapped up the minute I reentered the country.
Why must you persist in this libelous lie?
We all know the answer to that question: because you are devoid of any sense of honor or ethics whatsoever.
Pedophiles like you rarely have those qualities.
The groomer uses a LOT of homophobic insults.golfboy » 09 Feb 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Strange how fixated you are on gay sex.
Got a little tiny stiffy, you sick pedo?
Do you turn EVERY argument sexual, or just the ones I've seen you in, groomer?maineman » 09 Feb 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ lie. no arousal... only horror at your ability to procure mexican children.
You admitted to being able to procure mexican second grade children from your home in Idaho...
That's just sick.
Yea, I always find it interesting when liberals use gay lifestyle choices as slurs.Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2023, 11:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The groomer uses a LOT of homophobic insults.
I find it very upsetting.