Oh, Joe doesn’t lie. He commits inconsequential gaffes.Cannonpointer » 04 Feb 2023, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Careful. A mental disorder would disqualify pedo joe.
No one wants willie brown's dick sucker at the tiller - not even willie brown's dick sucker, I'd wager.
What are you blabbering about? Both Trump and Santos are only guilty of inconsequential gaffes. No big deal…right?Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Pathological lying could finally be getting attention as a mental disorder
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/03/health/s ... index.html
Because the so mentally disordered litter this place...
To the entitled, cheating in college is inconsequential. Lying about anything and everything is inconsequential.Huey » 04 Feb 2023, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, Joe doesn’t lie. He commits inconsequential gaffes.
@Blackvegetable
OH, THE HUMANITY!Huey » 04 Feb 2023, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I missed. You got double digit examples of out right lies, not inconsequential gaffes.
Biden TWICE made the 5 time comment in separate speeches weeks apart. Hell you can’t even say he wrong. Have your balls not dropped yet?
Here is my response to trump lies, even those I criticized:
I see no point in fetishizing inconsequential gaffes...and I find the laboring of them by a little fluffer as shameless as he is relentless a typical bit of useful idiotry.
The 2 of you lie constantly.Cannonpointer » 04 Feb 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑ To the entitled, cheating in college is inconsequential. Lying about anything and everything is inconsequential.
UNLESS THE OTHER TEAM DOES IT.
Here's a Word,Huey » 04 Feb 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ What are you blabbering about? Both Trump and Santos are only guilty of inconsequential gaffes. No big deal…right?
Youre to stupid to get it. Read my sig!Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Here's a Word,
This is **** being fed to you by an Election Denier..
How does that satisfy the definition of "inconsequential "?
That refutes the evidence how fruit fly?
This is why that thread was bumped. You wanted to read litigate this.
No...you bumped it after, once again, insisting that you couldn't understand why I posted it.Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why that thread was bumped. You wanted to read litigate this.
BV, you have always sucked at trying to guess my motivations.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you bumped it after, once again, insisting that you couldn't understand why I posted it.
When I posted two examples of me doing so, going back 18 months, you had to 'splain away the unambiguous evidence of your lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfhjH-FuSI8
He already bolted from this thread.
From his own thread - what a **** pansy.
He's all over the place.