turnaround:
turnaround:Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Just answer the question you challenged me to ask...
This is great.....Both you and Ginger, running from your words...
Nice job.
Post the rule on "turnaround"Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ turnaround:
Why did you ask it?
Can’t recall the answer I have given you numerous times?
Holy **** are you stupid...
Post the rule on how many times in a 5 year time frame I am obligated to answer the exact same question…
I:did answer it. Wanna see?Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Just answer the question you challenged me to ask...
This is great.....Both you and Ginger, running from your words...
Nice job.
Post the rule on "turnaround", and I'll tell you.Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ turnaround:
Why did you ask it?
Can’t recall the answer I have given you numerous times?
Holy **** are you stupid...
You could always make your case instead…
Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Post the rule on how many times in a 5 year time frame I am obligated to answer the exact same question…
Or you could formulate a case…
@BlackvegetableHuey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Asked and already answered. A million times. You could always make you case.
But, 67, you are not smart enough to do so.
I will say it has a distinct design that makes a non battlefield weapon.![]()
![]()
![]()
I wanna see the answer to the question.
That's not an answer...
I don’t do rules.
Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ I wanna see the answer to the question.
Not a response.
He doesn't like that answer, so he will ask you again... and again... and again... and again...
Post the rule on turnaround.Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Post the rule on how many times in a 5 year time frame I am obligated to answer the exact same question…
Or you could formulate a case…
No, your the idiot. You can’t rmemeber the answer to a question you have me hundreds of times on per the last 5 years.Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ That's not an answer...
It's a response.
You're an idiot.
Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t do rules.
@Vegas
You we’re right. His meltdown is going on a week…
It’s his thread. He can do what he likes.RedheadedStranger » 07 Feb 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't like that answer, so he will ask you again... and again... and again... and again...
Make your case.Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Post the rule on turnaround.
Then clarify your two stands on repetition.
It doesn't answer the question, mook..RedheadedStranger » 07 Feb 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't like that answer, so he will ask you again... and again... and again... and again...