Liberal Forum

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 11:53 am

So?  I addressed that yesterday.  It is a minor Point because bith of us Understand the weapon was not designed for the battlefied.

 

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:01 pm

67,

You have me the same question for five years.  You have gotten the same answer for five years.  You have lost every time

67, 

I invited you to ask with an answer teed up.  I am the puppet master. The purpose of getting you to ask it was not to answer it for the hundredth time.  It was to have a reason to post that you have asked the same question hundreds of times over the last 5 years and you have always gotten the same answer, and it ends now,

You options are:

1.  Look up an older exchange.

2..Make your own case.

3.  STFU, get to the corner, and take your beating like a man.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm

That answer is in conflict with EVERY citation, and now your buddy Ginger...

But you continue to claim victory.

Can't reconcile these two facts.

67,

You have me the same question for five years.  You have gotten the same answer for five years.  You have lost every time

67, 

I invited you to ask with an answer teed up.  I am the puppet master. The purpose of getting you to ask it was not to answer it for the hundredth time.  It was to have a reason to post that you have asked the same question hundreds of times over the last 5 years and you have always gotten the same answer, and it ends now,

You options are:

1.  Look up an older exchange.

2..Make your own case.

3.  STFU, get to the corner, and take your beating like a man.

RedheadedStranger » 07 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm

Exactly... only Rico here can't accept that fact so he just keeps asking and asking and asking... 

He's been destroyed so badly on this topic that his only recourse is to try and pit you and I against each other... even though you and I have been on the same page since the beginning.

He simply can't bring himself to admit that he was wrong, and that's the only play he has left to try and save face.

It's a narcissist thing.

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:08 pm

Thatvwas a minor point I discussed yesterday. We both agree the weapon was not designed for the battlefield.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm

Your words are clear...

No need for you to both retell.

This years' long curbstomping is officially over..

Please sweep up what remains of your Li'l Buddy....and thanks for your service.

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm

       

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:01 pm

67, 

I invited you to ask with an answer teed up.  I am the puppet master. The purpose of getting you to ask it was not to answer it for the hundredth time.  It was to have a reason to post that you have asked the same question hundreds of times over the last 5 years and you have always gotten the same answer, and it ends now,

You options are:

1.  Look up an older exchange.

2..Make your own case.

3.  STFU, get to the corner, and take your beating like a man.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm

No, Tiny....it was THE point....until you lost....again.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm

Lie still for the broom, smokey..

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm

67,

We both know the weapon was not designed for the battlefield.  Your 5 year *** whoopin continues…

Have you decided yet if you are willing to risk your physical well being on your assesment of the pic you reposted?

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm

Your words are clear...

No need for you to both retell.

This years' long curbstomping is officially over..

Please sweep up what remains of your Li'l Buddy....and thanks for your service.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm

And "Ecuador" was "just a test"..

Yea....we know....

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:13 pm

Broom?  Over a weapon not designed for the battlefield?   

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm

LMAO!

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm

Tiny,

No more retelling..

It's over...

Go yell at Ginger.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm

You lost....again.....at the hand of Ginger - your fellow ammosexual.

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm

Ignore facts..

67,

We both know the weapon was not designed for the battlefield.  Your 5 year *** whoopin continues…

Have you decided yet if you are willing to risk your physical well being on your assesment of the pic you reposted?

Regardless, your 5 year losing streak continues,  the weapon was not designed for the battalefield.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm

No one doubles up on Stupid quite like you.

Huey » 07 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm

       

Nope

Tnis is your thread.  We can do this all day,