Liberal Forum

Sad whackadoos on the right believe an orange,gun grabbing carnival barker like trump.

Squatchman » 12 Feb 2023, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 8:56 am

Sad whackadoos on the right believe an orange,gun grabbing carnival barker like trump.

trump never tried grabbing guns. biden is trying now... not going to work out well for him or assholes like you

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 8:58 am

trump never tried grabbing guns. biden is trying now... not going to work out well for him or assholes like you

The executive order trump signed banning bump stocks never happened?
Selective memory much?
 

Squatchman » 12 Feb 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:01 am

The executive order trump signed banning bump stocks never happened?
Selective memory much?

is that a gun? wow you really are a **** retard

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:07 am

is that a gun? wow you really are a **** retard

  Anti 2A nonetheless.
Gun grabber Trump.
 

Squatchman » 12 Feb 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:30 am

  Anti 2A nonetheless.
Gun grabber Trump.

is it a gun or not? answer the question asshole.

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:34 am

is it a gun or not? answer the question asshole.

so you are cool with banning high capacity magazines, because they aren't GUNS?
Y/N

Only 139?

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:01 am

so you are cool with banning high capacity magazines, because they aren't GUNS?
Y/N

Why do you libtards insist on answering a question with a question?
 

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:48 am

Why do you libtards insist on answering a question with a question?

A bump stock is not a gun... it is an accessory to a gun that makes it more deadly.

A high capacity magazine is not a gun... it is an accessory to a gun that makes it more deadly.

The NRA opposed banning both.

Where do YOU stand?

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 11:22 am

A bump stock is not a gun... it is an accessory to a gun that makes it more deadly.

A high capacity magazine is not a gun... it is an accessory to a gun that makes it more deadly.

The NRA opposed banning both.

Where do YOU stand?

I am fine with banning bump stocks.
Magazines are part of the gun they are necessary in order for the gun to work. 

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 11:45 am

I am fine with banning bump stocks.
Magazines are part of the gun they are necessary in order for the gun to work.

Are you suggesting that a gun will not work if it has a normal capacity magazine rather than a high capacity one?

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 11:53 am

Are you suggesting that a gun will not work if it has a normal capacity magazine rather than a high capacity one?

30 round clips are standard for the AR-15 

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 11:57 am

30 round clips are standard for the AR-15

nice dodge.

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:52 pm

nice dodge.

not a dodge, sorry you can't handle the truth

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:57 pm

not a dodge, sorry you can't handle the truth

you didn't answer the question.

You claimed that magazines were necessary to make guns work.  No one is disputing that.  Let's see if you can answer the question this time:  Are you saying that ONLY HIGH CAPACITY magazines will allow a gun to function?  Y/N?

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm

you didn't answer the question.

You claimed that magazines were necessary to make guns work.  No one is disputing that.  Let's see if you can answer the question this time:  Are you saying that ONLY HIGH CAPACITY magazines will allow a gun to function?  Y/N?

any magazine will make the gun work. you really don't know a thing about guns.

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:06 pm

any magazine will make the gun work. you really don't know a thing about guns.

I actually know quite a bit.  As you may have forgotten, I was a weapons officer on a fast frigate and was proficient with every weapon in our ship's armory.  I earned both the Rifle and Pistol Expert medals very early on in my career.

My question is again...you say you are not against banning bump stocks, which are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  But you said that magazines were necessary for a weapon to function... while dodging the obvious question as to whether or not you were also not against banning high capacity magazines that greatly increase the number of rounds per magazine and, therefore, also are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  Try again little fella.

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm

I actually know quite a bit.  As you may have forgotten, I was a weapons officer on a fast frigate and was proficient with every weapon in our ship's armory.  I earned both the Rifle and Pistol Expert medals very early on in my career.

My question is again...you say you are not against banning bump stocks, which are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  But you said that magazines were necessary for a weapon to function... while dodging the obvious question as to whether or not you were also not against banning high capacity magazines that greatly increase the number of rounds per magazine and, therefore, also are accessories designed to make a weapon deadlier.  Try again little fella.

You just can't read between the lines can ya? 
There NEVER will be a ban on high capacity magazines. I am totally against it!!!! **** liberals want to limit our rights so the chinks can just come into our country and take over. You are one of them. You didn't serve anywhere. You don't respect the Constitution the way it is written. **** off before you get hurt bitch.

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm

You just can't read between the lines can ya? 
There NEVER will be a ban on high capacity magazines. I am totally against it!!!! **** liberals want to limit our rights so the chinks can just come into our country and take over. You are one of them. You didn't serve anywhere. You don't respect the Constitution the way it is written. **** off before you get hurt bitch.

why then do you support the bump stock ban?