No you aren't. You're an atheist.
LOL, you're right. Who would you respect more?Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Retardo Suave, although a senior citizen, thinks being man depends on how many women he has slept with. Or says he slept with. He talks about how many women he has had more than a private in the barracks on payday.
But a Playah.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude,
Not including "transactionals", did you break double figures...top 20?
You are a worthless piece of **** who has ADMITTED he cannot tell a woman from a man.
Skans » 02 Jan 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL, you're right. Who would you respect more?
- A man who dated one girl he was madly in love with throughout high school and college, and whom he married right after college, who has never cheated on her.
![]()
- A man who ( claims to have) bedded 100 women over 50 years, never having married one of them.
And he crossed out golden words, like the **** (s)he is.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Retardo Suave, although a senior citizen, thinks being man depends on how many women he has slept with. Or says he slept with. He talks about how many women he has had more than a private in the barracks on payday.
For some time, so was I. Every one of those women took a part of my soul. Not because they were "evil", bad, nasty, greedy, bitchy - nothing of the sort.
I learned to never prey on the damaged or vulnerable very early. Accordingly, I've declined more than most men enjoy.Skans » 02 Jan 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ For some time, so was I. Every one of those women took a part of my soul. Not because they were "evil", bad, nasty, greedy, bitchy - nothing of the sort.
Some had kids. Some wanted kids. Some were just lonely and not wanting to feel their age. All of them were more vulnerable than I ever wanted to admit. They just wanted to be loved by someone who thought they were special. I took something from each of them, something I can't give back or replace. I remember all of them.
I had to make a conscious decision to stop - that kind of **** will eat your soul bite by bite. At some point, you "Playahs" have nothing left to offer a woman, even if you meet the one of your dreams. You'll get bored. You'll get the itch. Then - well, you know what happens.
I LMAO when he strikes thru one post and in a later post demands you post the information he lined out. Then he turns into a whiny lil bitch when you won't do it and walk away.Cannonpointer » 02 Jan 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ And he crossed out golden words, like the **** (s)he is.
In the case of Skans' post, he crossed out words that would hold the reader to a moral standard.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I LMAO when he strikes thru one post and in a later post demands you post the information he lined out. Then he turns into a whiny lil bitch when you won't do it and walk away.
Don't have to believe in the Bible, Quran, Torah, Buddhism, Zen, Mythology, Scientology, Quantum Mechanics, Space Time Continuum, Economic Theories, Darwinism, etc to understand how power of suggesting life isn't self evident corrupts every alternate reality experiencing evolving only as genetically added to the species one at a time here now.
Thought...Blackvegetable » 09 Feb 2023, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ Yesterday, on a thread promoting the patently risible notion that Sarah Huckabee Sanders is anything more than the witless cracker spawn of a witless cracker, I accused her of being a "pig eyed sockpuppet"....
I was wrong.
Today I read more detail of her SOTU response.
Apparently she Marsha Blackburned...describing Democrats as a
“woke mob that can’t even tell you what a woman is”
Sarah, you swollen brain dead fashy ****....sit down, read, think, formulate policy, execute it.....
and all the idiots who suck that **** up with a firehose...
remember when you ran to the polls in 2004, incensed about ***?
and then watched as the *** warriors immediately thereafter gathered for the *** of the GOP chair.
you people are **** stupid as ****.
Peas in a pod cast/message board.
I only read the first few words of what you write. Mainly because you CAN'T write. Plus, you're always wrong. Yes, you are mortal, illiterate and incapable of even the most basic level of critical thinking.
Skans » 07 Mar 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ I only read the first few words of what you write. Mainly because you CAN'T write. Plus, you're always wrong. Yes, you are mortal, illiterate and incapable of even the most basic level of critical thinking.
You imploded in THREE sentences....I only read the first few words of what you write. Mainly because you CAN'T write. Plus, you're always wrong
Lame as ****.
Yeah, it's always the guys who average over 100 posts per day [that's a post every 6 minutes of every waking hour of every single day rain or shine, that are split between multiple on line, bat **** crazy accounts] that we assume must be the real "Ladies Men".R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I learned to never prey on the damaged or vulnerable very early. Accordingly, I've declined more than most men enjoy.
I've never "worked" bars; I don't proceed without enthusiastic, and sober, consent.

Your talent for ignoring self evident life explodes in every post you add. your motives are as self evident as your posts. You loathe the natural limitations of adapting as displaced ancestrally here now.R. Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ You imploded in THREE sentences....
You "reason" like a hysterical crack ho'.
Since we're bumping necro threads, I figure I will remind everyone that Rico Snave thinks the definition of a "woman" is someone who wears makeup and colors their hair...Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2023, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑
A woman is someone who wears makeup and colors their hair..