If you spend an hour and a half each day on hair and makeup - just to leave the house - odds are prohibitive that you're a bitch.*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Since we're bumping necro threads, I figure I will remind everyone that Rico Snave thinks the definition of a "woman" is someone who wears makeup and colors their hair...
https://i.postimg.cc/3rjdXnVC/levine.jpg
LOL
Wow. So a fella can trick you into a date by spending coif-time?Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ If you spend an hour and a half each day on hair and makeup - just to leave the house - odds are prohibitive that you're a bitch.
Being a tweener, you wouldn't understand.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Wow. So a fella can trick you into a date by spending coif-time?
What a fruit you are, little ***.
Yeah, yeah, fruitcake.Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Being a tweener, you wouldn't understand.
Mine must look good "unplugged".
Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, yeah, fruitcake.
You have admitted that you must approximate in judging gender - that the concept of a "woman" being a discrete and definable things is above your capacities.
Here's the thing, you queer. ALL OF WESTERN SCIENCE is derived from Aristotle's three premises, the very first of which is that A is A and can never be B. You deny science the very minute you pretend that nonsense like how long a person primps indicates gender. Likewise, when queers like you embrace science fallacies like, "He's a chick cuz he SAYS he's a chick," you demonstrate that you are uneducated in the fundamentals of science and that you embrace fallacies - like a rube, rube.
You can keep running all the *** bluffs you like - ya just look stupider and stupider as correction washes off your back like water off the mullet of a greasy trailer trash redneck.
other than the definition that inspired your hissy fit, you mean...that the concept of a "woman" being a discrete and definable things is above your capacities.
"Woman" is not "Science".Here's the thing, you queer. ALL OF WESTERN SCIENCE
that's "logic".is derived from Aristotle's three premises, the very first of which is that A is A and can never be B. You deny science
You are one genuinely illiterate ****, boy.
Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ If you spend an hour and a half each day on hair and makeup - just to leave the house - odds are prohibitive that you're a bitch.
If you're talking about the King of MAGAt Nation, perhaps.
Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ If you spend an hour and a half each day on hair and makeup - just to leave the house - odds are prohibitive that you're a bitch.
Clearly not, Stupid Piece of ****Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ You are one genuinely illiterate ****, boy.
Is sparrow science, ruhtard?
Vegas » 20 May 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ I have utterly demoralized you.
1. Gee ya'll....do you think he is now lurking around in my profile?![]()
Back to hiding behind questions again, I see.Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ Back to hiding behind questions again, I see.
I kicked your ***
Wi.
Prove it. **** your assertions.Vegas » 20 May 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ Back to hiding behind questions again, I see.
I kicked your ***
Wi.
Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ If you're talking about the King of MAGAt Nation, perhaps.
Prove it. **** your assertions.
Blackvegetable » 20 May 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly not, Stupid Piece of ****
- 1.
a small Old World bird related to the weaverbirds, typically with brown and gray plumage.- 2.
any of a number of birds that resemble true sparrows in size or color.
I'm talking about the fruit you worship.BuckNaked » 20 May 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I’m talkin bout the dude in the photo he is a freak in plugs health department
I publicly dehumanized you.
Stayed away to see how quickly @Cannonpointer would lose the "Post Image" feature.