If I'm posting a citation, what the **** do you think you're "slamming" and how?Huey » 17 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't debate the meaning words. You have already posted from a credible citation. I just slammed you with it.
Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ If I'm posting a citation, what the **** do you think you're "slamming" and how?
Not again..Huey » 17 Feb 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You should read from the source you used. It clearly lists the military weapons and the civilian weapons. Armalite 15 became the Colt 601 wich later became the M 16.
No ties to the Sporter except for exterior appearance.
You mince and parse trying to hide the fact that you can't defend yourself.Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
I don't intend to debate the meaning of words with an illiterate, nor will I hold myself to your entirely arbitrary distinctions.
I remain receptive to any credible citation supporting the case you can't articulate...
What is Tiny contesting?DeezerShoove » 17 Feb 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You mince and parse trying to hide the fact that you can't defend yourself.
Your gun "debate" isn't even a debate.
It's a discussion about the attributes of an inanimate object.
What is there to decide?
****, you are stupid...
You mean you don't even know?
I'm sure no one suspects you're bluffing...
Who the **** are you even talking about?
The caravan passed, Coozie..DeezerShoove » 18 Feb 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Who the **** are you even talking about?
I have no audience
(especially of people that hate me and love to **** on everything I post... like you.)
Besides, BlaVe, you are the King of Bluff.
Totally full of yourself... you know: ****.
So, you really are just attention whoring since you have nothing to offer regarding firearms.
It is clearly listed listed as a civilian model. I suggest you go look at the entire article. You wouldn’t look so stupid. And you wouldn’t have to ask such stupid questions.Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Not again..
Is the SP1 CLEARLY listed as a variant?
It's yes or no.Huey » 18 Feb 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ It is clearly listed listed as a civilian model. I suggest you go look at the entire article. You wouldn’t look so stupid. And you wouldn’t have to ask such stupid questions.
You question was answered.
Post the question.Huey » 18 Feb 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ You question was answered.
It is clearly listed listed as a civilian model. I suggest you go look at the entire article. You wouldn’t look so stupid. And you wouldn’t have to ask such stupid questions.
Post your own question.
If it was, you'd post it.Huey » 18 Feb 2023, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ Post your own question.
You question was answered.
It is clearly listed listed as a civilian model. I suggest you go look at the entire article. You wouldn’t look so stupid. And you wouldn’t have to ask such stupid questions.
Post your own question.Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ If it was, you'd post it.
I accept your surrender....again.
Why I don't need to waste time.
you've been told not to open with lies, Tiny.Huey » 18 Feb 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Post your own question.
You question was answered.
It is clearly listed listed as a civilian model. I suggest you go look at the entire article. You wouldn’t look so stupid. And you wouldn’t have to ask such stupid questions.
Check the category at the source you posted from.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 designHuey » 18 Feb 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Check the category at the source you posted from.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models