Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:00 pm

Not interested in your version.

I'm looking for the answer indicated by the evidence.

You got the answer and failed to make a point.  At this point all I can do SHRUG at your stupidity.

Huey » 19 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm

Kydex 67,

You addressed and you are wrong.  The Colt AR 15 Sports Version model is a different design.  That is what the source at ammo.and is telling.

You probably shouldn’t have lined thru the answer, numbnuts.

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 19 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm

Kydex 67,

You addressed and you are wrong.  The Colt AR 15 Sports Version model is a different design.  That is what the source at ammo.and is telling.

@Blackvegetable  

You probably shouldn’t have lined thru the answer, numbnuts.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:01 pm

You got the answer and failed to make a point.  At this point all I can do SHRUG at your stupidity.

the answer makes the case.

 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:05 pm

@Blackvegetable  

You probably shouldn’t have lined thru the answer, numbnuts.

Tiny,


It's assertion.

worthless.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm

Tiny,

It's assertion.

worthless.

Nope.  Comes straight from the ATF letter.  I brings facts.  You bring assertions.

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:25 pm

the answer makes the case.

I have posted the answer.

Here is another answer from the letter.

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State your case.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm

I have posted the answer.

Here is another answer from the letter.

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State your case.

I've stated mine....I have no idea what case you believe this makes...

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm

Nope.  Comes straight from the ATF letter.  I brings facts.  You bring assertions.

No...

I quote the citations verbatim.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm

I've stated mine....I have no idea what case you believe this makes...

Nope, you haven’t.  Here is the name of the weapon.  State your case:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm

No...

I quote the citations verbatim.

This comes straight from the AATF Letter:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State your case.  

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm

This comes straight from the AATF Letter:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State your case.

@Blackvegetable  

Clearly and concisely make your stand.  What does the name have to do with anything?

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:07 pm

No...

I quote the citations verbatim.

And yet, you don’t understand them.  State your case.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:42 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Clearly and concisely make your stand.  What does the name have to do with anything?

@Blackvegetable  

Run, coward, run

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm

This comes straight from the AATF Letter:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State your case.

And?

To what case is this attached?
 

@Blackvegetable  

people who understand these issues get to grill filet mignon on a Pit Boss Series.



So, what is up with the name of the rifle?
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:43 pm

And?

To what case is this attached?

You wanted the name.  You got it.  You tell me.  Here is the name:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon


 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm

Nope, you haven’t.  Here is the name of the weapon.  State your case:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

What do you think this means?
 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:46 pm

You wanted the name.  You got it.  You tell me.  Here is the name:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

I don't care what ATF say about it.

It is irrelevant. 

What this "snippet" makes perfectly clear, again, is that the "sport weapon" is a "version" of something else..

Not an "independent design"

Acknowledge that you've been debunked again.

Your failure to do so will constitute your unconditional surrender. 
 
 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm

@Blackvegetable  

people who understand these issues get to grill filet mignon on a Pit Boss Series.



So, what is up with the name of the rifle?

A tactical propane toaster?