Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:51 pm

A tactical propane toaster?

A smoker.  

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:52 pm

A smoker.

Did you get much for the Tactical X Crossover on the trade?

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:46 pm

What do you think this means?

I know what it means.  You whined and moaned for the name which has been posted multiple times.  

State your case.  You will suffer a sucking head wound as well as a severe curb stomping.  But, you are not man enough to do so.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm

I don't care what ATF say about it.

It is irrelevant. 

What this "snippet" makes perfectly clear, again, is that the "sport weapon" is a "version" of something else..

Not an "independent design"

Acknowledge that you've been debunked again.

Your failure to do so will constitute your unconditional surrender.

No, I does not make it clear.  State your case and I will curb stomp you once and for all.

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:54 pm

Did you get much for the Tactical X Crossover on the trade?

If you become man enough to take a stand on either issues you will receive the curbstomping of your life,  Which there has been many.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:54 pm

No, I does not make it clear.  State your case and I will curb stomp you once and for all.

I just did.

Curbstomped you with another of your snippets.

 
 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:55 pm

If you become man enough to take a stand on either issues you will receive the curbstomping of your life,  Which there has been many.

My stand hasn't changed in more than 2 years...

As demonstrated. 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:57 pm

My stand hasn't changed in more than 2 years...

As demonstrated.

You demanded the name.  What issue. Do you have with the name?

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

State it clearly and leave no wiggle room.  
prove to dad you are not the ****** he thought you were. 

Be am , Chris from Salem.

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 5:56 pm

I just did.

Curbstomped you with another of your snippets.

No, it is not clear.  If you state your case and I don’t curbstomped you I will leave for a month.  It will cost you nothing.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:04 pm

No, it is not clear.  If you state your case and I don’t curbstomped you I will leave for a month.  It will cost you nothing.

But you're making yourself the judge of that..

I've got a better idea.

Let's agree to a set of ESTABLISHED facts.

 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:03 pm

You demanded the name.  What issue. Do you have with the name?

State it clearly and leave no wiggle room.  
prove to dad you are not the ****** he thought you were. 

Be am , Chris from Salem.

The weapon in question was what at the time was the only COLT AR-15 in existence, specifically the full auto version sold to the Air Force in 1962.

This is why using ATF lingo is stupid.

Nod.

Stop being an imbecile, Princess Sheilagh of Lilliput Circle.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:05 pm

But you're making yourself the judge of that..

I've got a better idea.

Let's agree to a set of ESTABLISHED facts.

Changing the game at this late stage.  No sir, you said if I stated the name you would make you case,  Balls in your court.  Just do it.  

state and what you think are facts.  Without questions.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:15 pm

Changing the game at this late stage.  No sir, you said if I stated the name you would make you case,  Balls in your court.  Just do it.  

state and what you think are facts.  Without questions.

Don't presume, Verbul.

This isn't a "game"...

I'm defending the same proposition I've made from the beginning.

The one consistent with all citations and @Redheaded Stranger  
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:09 pm

The weaponn in question was what at the time was the only COLT AR-15 in existence, specifically the full auto version sold to the Air Force in 1962.

This is why using ATF lingo is stupid.

Nod.

Stop being an imbecile, Princess Sheilagh of Lilliput Circle.

Bingo, you lose.  Let’s look at the wording:

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

Thru the 60s the term automatic rifle referred to any auto loading weapon.  Meaning it will reload with each trigger pull.  In the reference to an machine gun it will continue to fire.  If you had read the article you are citing you would now this.  

Your Google studies did not teach you that.  For instance the ammo for a Colt 1911, a semi auto pistol, is 45 ACP.  Automatic Pistol.  But, it is not an automatic weapon.  It is a semi automatic, or auto loading weapon.  

Automatic Rifle in the 60# does not mean what it means now, ya **** moron.

**** own you, ******.  You just got severely curbstomped.  

@Redheaded Stranger  

@SOCK SAVINGS  

 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:17 pm

Don't presume, Verbul.

This isn't a "game"...

I'm defending the same proposition I've made from the beginning.

The one consistent with all citations and @Redheaded Stranger

You just lost.  Big **** time.
 
 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:23 pm

You just lost.  Big **** time.

So you assert.

But you're a moron.
 

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:22 pm

Bingo, you lose.  Let’s look at the wording:

Thru the 60s the term automatic rifle referred to any auto loading weapon.  Meaning it will reload with each trigger pull.  In the reference to an machine gun it will continue to fire.  If you had read the article you are citing you would now this.  

Your Google studies did not teach you that.  For instance the ammo for a Colt 1911, a semi auto pistol, is 45 ACP.  Automatic Pistol.  But, it is not an automatic weapon.  It is a semi automatic, or auto loading weapon.  

Automatic Rifle in the 60# does not mean what it means now, ya **** moron.

**** own you, ******.  You just got severely curbstomped.  

@Redheaded Stranger  

@SOCK SAVINGS

Stupid,

I read that part too.

But let me explain why your narrative is so stupid.

If the original, from which the version was derived, was designed to be semi automitic, why would they need to demonstrate that the "Sporting version" wasn't a "machine gun", and why would it need to be "modified"?

You can't run from everything, Sheilagh. 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:33 pm

Stupid,

I read that part too.

But let me explain why your narrative is so stupid.

If the original, from which the version was derived, was designed to be semi automitic, why would they need to demonstrate that the "Sporting version" wasn't a "machine gun", and why would it need to be "modified"?

You can't run from everything, Sheilagh.

You lost.  The ATF used terms from the 1934 NFA such as machine gun to describe what we now call automatics.  In the passage below they are not discussing the Armilite Rifle 15, the prototype is what we now call the semi automatic Sporter.  That is why it was defined as “not a machine gun.  Get thenfick face, loser.  I have no been waiting for days to kill your argument with this.  You ain’t ****.

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon

it is over.  You lost BIGLY.  It is not a weapon designed for the battlefield.  See ya tomorrow, ya **** loser.

Huey » 20 Feb 2023, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:39 pm

You lost.  The ATF used terms from the 1934 NFA such as machine gun to describe what we now call automatics.  In the passage below they are not discussing the Armilite Rifle 15, the prototype is what we now call the semi automatic Sporter.  That is why it was defined as “not a machine gun.  Get thenfick face, loser.  I have no been waiting for days to kill your argument with this.  You ain’t ****.

it is over.  You lost BIGLY.  It is not a weapon designed for the battlefield.  See ya tomorrow, ya **** loser.

Tiny,

If ATF is making reference to the AR-15,  there was only one "AR-15" in production in 1963..

That is the Colt "AR-15" sold to the Air Force in 1962, which would be designated M16.

Acknowledge. 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Feb 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2023, 6:43 pm

Tiny,

If ATF is making reference to the AR-15,  there was only one "AR-15" in production in 1963..

That is the Colt "AR-15" sold to the Air Force in 1962, which would be designated M16.

Acknowledge.

Wrong.

It is the opinion of this office that the AR-15 automatic rifle used as a
prototype model of the Sport Version weapon